Wow that didn't take long for the first crybaby thread to appear.
Obviously you know a way to engineer a better machine that is 11.6 and can cram a lot more technology into that small of space.
Better enjoy the 11.6" Mac while you can. Future models will be 21:9 to accomodate also a numerical keypad.
It's very simple:
Many people don't need much, only something small for text editing, browsing and email/im. For those people the 11.6" is perfect. LED screen, full-size keyboard, good GPU.
Other people want more, so they won't be buying the 11.6" because you simply can't fit too much in such a small machine.
End of story.
Better enjoy the 11.6" Mac while you can. Future models will be 21:9 to accomodate also a numerical keypad.
why?! the 13'' is not 16:9.
No you can't. Most sites are 900-1100px wide. Add some more for the scroll bar, that's 1800-2200+ for two windows side by side, so the 1440px won't help much.Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
Does any know if I can put two web browser side by side without any side scrolling on the MacBook Air 13.3 ". The resolution and width of the screen seems like it can. Can anyone justify this?
Truth.
Personally, the 11.6" MBA will be a perfect supplement to my MBP, because an i7 and discrete graphics is a bit much for taking notes in class.
Also, carrying around less weight would be a welcome blessing in my day-to-day.
It's inevitable!
Type for a while on a netbook and you will know exactly why.
Not the first time Edgadget has screwed something up. I read the same thing and then misread the specs on the apple website and thought I was going crazy when the two screens looked like they were different ratios in the pictures.
You guys do know there are full sized keyboard netbooks right?