I would not recommend the OCZ core 2 SSD in Mac Pro

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by HyperX13, Sep 19, 2009.

  1. HyperX13 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2009
    #1
    Look at these sucky writes:

    Results 78.44
    System Info
    Xbench Version 1.3
    System Version 10.6.1 (10B504)
    Physical RAM 12288 MB
    Model MacPro3,1
    Drive Type OCZ CORE_SSD V2
    Disk Test 78.44
    Sequential 118.66
    Uncached Write 157.13 96.47 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write 148.69 84.13 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read 58.92 17.24 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read 274.03 137.73 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Random 58.58
    Uncached Write 16.68 1.77 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write 155.65 49.83 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read 2293.78 16.25 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read 682.03 126.56 MB/sec [256K blocks]

    I am very happy with my Crucial drive in MBP, and I only went with OCZ because Crucials are back ordered.
     
  2. Salavat23 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    #2
    What do you expect? The Core 2 is the lowest end drive family they have (after solid). If you wanted good writes and the such, you should have invested in an OCZ Vertex.
     
  3. 300D macrumors 65816

    300D

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Location:
    Tulsa
    #3
    The seek latency time advantage is what matters with an SSD.

    In the end, that SSD is still faster than most SATA hard drives on the market.
     
  4. SinisterJoe macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    #4
    I have an OCZ Core on my MP and I'm pretty happy with it. Certainly there are faster options but you get what you pay for. I use mine in conjunction with magnetic drives for most of my data. (which I would need to do either way due to smaller SSD sizes -- so I figure it's best of both worlds)
     
  5. gianly1985 macrumors 6502a

    gianly1985

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008

Share This Page