Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
i5 vs i7 temperature
- Thread starter Tjosansa
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Specifically what iMac were you looking at. As far as im concerned, for gaming the GPU or graphics processing unit is alot more important than a higher powered CPU - the cpu wont do much in terms of performance for gaming.
they are both the same more or less as far as temperatures go - as long as you dont over clock it, which isnt possible on these iMacs i think, you will be good.
and yes, i7 will not make any difference for gaming, better graphics card will.
YES, there is a difference in temperature. A few degrees celsius hotter with the i7 CPU during max load. However, if necessary you can disable the turbo boost function (typically during gaming where both the CPU and GPU become very hot). I don't think you'll get a clear answer as far as noise goes i5 vs i7, as noone here has compared noise levels in both iMac models. What I can say that in OSX, you'll have to push the CPU pretty hard for the fan to rev up - I'm using the 3.4ghz i7 CPU.
From what I've understood, i7 will probably give you more smooth/instant reaction when doing very intense multitasking, but otherwise the difference is only noticable when doing decoding and other similar tasks. As far as gaming, remember that anything other than 1440p will look like crap, and 1440p is a very demanding resolution for a gfx card. Because of this fact, the bottleneck will be the 680MX, not the CPU. There are very few occations at present time where hyperthreading actually makes a difference in games. Maybe with games designed for the next console generation, noone knows...
From what I've understood, i7 will probably give you more smooth/instant reaction when doing very intense multitasking, but otherwise the difference is only noticable when doing decoding and other similar tasks. As far as gaming, remember that anything other than 1440p will look like crap, and 1440p is a very demanding resolution for a gfx card. Because of this fact, the bottleneck will be the 680MX, not the CPU. There are very few occations at present time where hyperthreading actually makes a difference in games. Maybe with games designed for the next console generation, noone knows...
Last edited:
Yes im going for the 680mx model. But i wait for the next imac and hoping for 780mx. I know there is no such card out yet but the same was for the 680mx when it came, i was told.
Does 1920*1080 really look like crap in games on an imac 27"?
Does 1920*1080 really look like crap in games on an imac 27"?
Imo it does look pretty bad. It is certainly playable, no doubt about that, but things are not crystal clear and are a little blurred or out of focus looking.
As for the original question -- I have the current gen imac fully maxxed out with 680mx and i7. I have never had a problem with it overheating even while playing demanding games on high.
I will mention however that when playing graphically intensive games, the fans do turn on to maximum speed and you can hear them audibly if it is a quiet game. The machine itself still remains cool to the touch though.
Yes, one should turn the fans up at a static high speed (typically 2500rpm in the latest most demanding games) to avoid very high temperatures. Therefore I recommend gaming with a high quality closed headphones set, so the fan noise doesn't become an issue quiet parts of the game.
"one should turn the fans up at a static high speed"
what does that mean? it does it auto right?
You may control the fan with applications such as iStat.
It would be easier to have a cool environment where ambient temps are moderate to cool, and use good headphones with noise canceling ability.
It would be easier to have a cool environment where ambient temps are moderate to cool, and use good headphones with noise canceling ability.
It does, dont mess with the system. iMacs are dead quite under load, at least my 2011 was. 2012 should be even better.