So I know there aren't any benchmarks yet..BUT curious y'alls opinion.
Lets say I don't care about retina and strictly comparing performance.
The air is 2.2/3.2 (turbo'd) and the rmbp is 3.1/3.4.
The graphics are hd 6000 and hd 6100
Is it safe to assume that these two laptops will perform almost identical, as the extra graphics power will be canceled out by pushing more pixels on retina?
On the processor side they are almost identical...The only thing I could think of is how they handle load. The air has less power to split between cpu and gpu, so maybe it wont work at full turbo as long? Or will the broadwell cpus keep cool longer, allowing it to run at full turbo under load?
Is it possible the new air i7 is just more efficient than its 28w pro version and that the air will perform just as good, just as long?
Any input would be appreciated, thanks in advance!
Lets say I don't care about retina and strictly comparing performance.
The air is 2.2/3.2 (turbo'd) and the rmbp is 3.1/3.4.
The graphics are hd 6000 and hd 6100
Is it safe to assume that these two laptops will perform almost identical, as the extra graphics power will be canceled out by pushing more pixels on retina?
On the processor side they are almost identical...The only thing I could think of is how they handle load. The air has less power to split between cpu and gpu, so maybe it wont work at full turbo as long? Or will the broadwell cpus keep cool longer, allowing it to run at full turbo under load?
Is it possible the new air i7 is just more efficient than its 28w pro version and that the air will perform just as good, just as long?
Any input would be appreciated, thanks in advance!
Last edited: