Anti-trust law doesn't require a monopoly, only significant market power
Actually, significant and durable market power. Which is how the FTC defines a monopoly.
http://www.ftc.gov/bc/antitrust/monopolization_defined.shtm
You should look up what a personal attack is before you accuse someone of it.
What other point was there to your comments other than to attack my character? An ad hominem argument. Completely off topic.
So now you're telling me you don't know how to trim quotes?
No, I made a joke. Hence, the smiley.
Bundle? My example was a gas station refusing to sell you gas because you don't want to buy their radiator coolant that they're pushing. In what country is a gas station allowed to refuse service because you don't also want to buy all their other products? I never said they were bundled. What gas station bundles radiator flushes with gasoline for goodness sake???
In the good old USA a gas station can refuse to sell you gas if you don't buy their radiator coolant. Probably a bad business plan, but it's not illegal. They can also refuse to sell you gas if you are wearing a purple shirt.
I'm pretty sure the connection between a bundle and requiring two things to be purchased together is obvious.