Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
59,697
23,875






When Apple called the iPod Touch the "Funnest iPod Ever", it was clear Apple was talking about gaming. But using the touch sensitive screen on the iPod -- and iPad and iPhone for that matter -- isn't necessarily the best way to input commands. Especially for action games like NBA JAM or Madden.

Some companies make "joysticks" that try to bridge the gap, but it's still a far cry from having physical buttons like a Nintendo DS. One solution is the iCade, which started as an April Fool's Joke, but was so popular that ThinkGeek turned it into a real product. It's great, but not exactly portable.

Now, we have the iControlPad. It's a Bluetooth control pad that's been in the works for more than three years -- and it's finally shipping.

Now, the iControlPad is great in theory, but it's not exactly an answer to gamer prayers -- through no fault of its own. No, the problem is that there aren't many games on the App Store that support it because of the restrictions Apple places on how bluetooth devices interact with apps. TouchArcade explains:
While, due to the aforementioned restrictions, the iControlPad can only interface with un-jailbroken iOS devices by way of keyboard emulation, it can interface with other platforms, including Android and WebOS, via the more robust protocols and, thus, deliver its full range of capabilities. Keyboard emulation does allow all other controls on the device to work under iOS -- but no analog sticks, which need to send a constant stream of positional data to the host device.
Jailbroken iOS devices, on the other hand, can take full advantage of the analog sticks:


While the iControlPad may be the controller that iOS gamers have been waiting for, the App support isn't quite there yet for non-jailbroken devices. The developers promise iCade emulation support in the future which so far appears to be generating the most App Store support for a 3rd party controller.

Article Link: iControlPad Brings Physical Gaming Controls to The iPhone
 
Last edited by a moderator:

James Enright

macrumors newbie
Jun 6, 2011
13
0
Too Big

It's too big and bulky it. I hope that on the iPhone 4 version its slimmer and slides out from the bottom.
 

LimeiBook86

macrumors 604
May 4, 2002
7,998
26
Go Vegan
Who cares how big it is? At least there's something out there that works! They tried many, many different designs and this one is the most universal. Yeah it may be a bit thick, but it works and it's compatible with many different devices. I'm just happy it's finally out, I've been waiting years for this thing!

Once the cost comes down a bit and the shipping is reasonable I'll buy one. Rumor is ThinkGeek.com was thinking re-selling it. That would be great. I've always loved the idea of a gamepad for the iPhone, even as far back as wishing for one for the iPod Video (so Sonic the Hedgehog could be played decently). :) I hope developers come out to support this accessory, because there's a lot of potential with this! :D
 

nagromme

macrumors G5
May 2, 2002
12,546
1,196
I’d actually like one of these (maybe in a better color scheme?) even though I’d mainly use it at home, just for certain longer game sessions.

50% of what I want it for is to have something bigger to grip! Easier on the hands.

30% of what I want it for is the physical buttons. I do fine without, but they’d be a nice option too.

The other 20% of what I want is those analog sticks! I hope (and believe) that they’ll be working someday in future. For every story people froth about with Apple “banning” something (the universal term for anything that doesn’t happen today), two stories slip quietly by about Apple being very flexible and changing to meet what people want (like the iPad orientation switch, Boot Camp, and magazine subscription rules). Apple has improved BT support before, and I suspect they will again.
 

extricated

macrumors 6502
Jul 14, 2011
444
59
Arkansas
Nice.
Maybe I'm naive, but it seems a product like this could propel IOS devices to new heights in the portable gaming platform market.
 

LimeiBook86

macrumors 604
May 4, 2002
7,998
26
Go Vegan
that's so dam hideous

If it works I don't care really what it looks like. It looks like a simple gamepad to me. I'm more concerned about Apple updating their Bluetooth drivers/software on the iOS devices so accessories like this can work properly without jailbreaking!
 

LimeiBook86

macrumors 604
May 4, 2002
7,998
26
Go Vegan
Why does it rely on Bluetooth, though?

Why not through the dock connector?

They tried that, and from what I believe Apple wouldn't approve it as an official accessory or something. (If I recall correctly). Also Bluetooth helps it be more compatible with all devices.
 

ArtOfWarfare

macrumors G3
Nov 26, 2007
9,442
5,833
Also Bluetooth helps it be more compatible with all devices.

Except, you know, the iPhone, where the joysticks don't work.

Oh well, I don't see any controller like this ever taking off...

The Flick or Fling or whatever it's called has it right... it turns the virtual joysticks on screen into real joysticks, without requiring developers to do anything.

For one of these controllers to take off, they need to get developers to make their games compatible with them... and I'm a developer and I'm hardly even considering it... are there shoulder buttons on it? If there are, I'll consider it, if not, no way.
 

ckurt25

macrumors 65816
Mar 25, 2009
1,099
446
Michigan, USA
Except, you know, the iPhone, where the joysticks don't work.

Oh well, I don't see any controller like this ever taking off...

The Flick or Fling or whatever it's called has it right... it turns the virtual joysticks on screen into real joysticks, without requiring developers to do anything.

For one of these controllers to take off, they need to get developers to make their games compatible with them... and I'm a developer and I'm hardly even considering it... are there shoulder buttons on it? If there are, I'll consider it, if not, no way.

The problem with the suction cup contolers is they still block out part of the screen. Some games it's not that big of a deal, others it is. They also don't address buttons.

I think the maker of these is hoping the big developers, EA for example, will take advantage of these. Playing Madden on this will be much closer to the console experience a lot of gamers enjoy. You may not see shoulder buttons on this for a while since the makers of mobile (not just iOS) games don't make games with that many buttons. If shoulder buttons are required to play the game the developer will limit themselves by designing their games just for people with control pads.

I would buy one of these if/when the price comes down. $55 seems like a high price for a device with limited support. I'd order one today if it were $29.99 or less.

A bummer that I see is that it is bluetooth so you won't be seeing these on planes any time soon.
 

LimeiBook86

macrumors 604
May 4, 2002
7,998
26
Go Vegan
Except, you know, the iPhone, where the joysticks don't work.

Yes but this is something that can thankfully be fixed. Worse case you have to Jailbreak, but it's Apple we have to turn to for Bluetooth support, as they need to update their Bluetooth software/drivers for the iPhone to allow this type of interaction with a device.
 

LimeiBook86

macrumors 604
May 4, 2002
7,998
26
Go Vegan
wow that looks like crap, did someone re-appropriate a 1st gen GameBoy?

Last time I checked the original GameBoy didn't have four action buttons, dual analog sticks and Bluetooth. ;) I don't think the design is that bad for a 3rd party accessory. It sure beats a bluetooth chip shoved into an NES controller!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.