Yes those who have proceeded to buy the first gen 8 core are very down on those of us who are still waiting for a 2007 Stoakley-Seaburg motherboard and a newer-faster stock graphics card. But wait we do. The price of a complete 8-core Mac Pro is closer to $6,000 not $2500. That is why I wait like you. But please note it's not like it's not going to happen as your topic title implies. It's merely a matter of when. My guess is August because it will have been a year since the first gen Mac Pro was announced. And Intel's Clovertown prices are scheduled to plunge at the end of July. While it could be as late as October when the last gen G5 PowerMacs were announced a year and a three quarters ago, to avoid product spotlight confusion, August is more likely so that October can only be all about Leopard.I think many people around here think as me
for me it because "what reason to pay $2500 for last year spec workstation"
I need clovertown cpu , new graphics card and 2GB base ram
Yes, wait you could but you would have destroyed all for which they have faught. - Yoda
I am holding out for the quantum processor with biological memory with HD. Will it still run photoshop?
Save us your banter, really. If you enjoy your 8-core thats great. However, there is a possiblity I will be paying $2500 for eight cores while you paid how much?
Sure I could buy now, but I don't see a point with some major things happening with chip prices in a month. I don't NEED it now, so I will wait. Sure I want it, but I can wait.
You don't have to keep posting in these to make yourself feel better about your purchase. You bought, go to the "I love my Mac Pro" thread and quite bugging the people who decide to wait and want to discuss possibilities of the update. Thanks.
Just getting sick and tired of all the "I want a better mac pro for cheaper" posts. You get over it. Jeez. Never heard so much whining in my life.
All I am saying is that complaining on these forums about how the mac pro is a bad deal is getting old. If you are going to wait then wait. This is like the 10th thread that has popped up in the past few days. Mac Pro is a great deal. In a year it will be faster and cheaper. That happens EVERY year. You can wait forever with that mentality.
Yeah, but the Mac Pro has been the same for a year. Did you forget that? Sure if they update next year it will be faster and cheaper. But why would I buy the year old model now when an update is imminent at last by the end of the year?
I think you are deciding what our "mentality" so that is suits your argument. MY mentality is to buy when a product is updated. The eight core update to ME is not an update, nor will I be spending over $1000 to upgrade to it anyway, when soon quad cores will be faster and cheaper and could easily trickle their way into the Mac Pro on the base end.
So this isn't about waiting forever, it is about using my money in a way that makes sense and buying now does not make sense. As I have said and as this thread title says, if it was updated today in a way that I thought was good I would buy today. Everyone on these threads tries to use the "you could wait forever so buy now" crap to justify their own purchase. DO you really think posting in these thread about how "You decided to not wait" is really any better than what is happening here? Please.
It was never my intention to "complain" the 8-core Mac Pro is not ready for me. What I have always written and always consistently intended was to buy the 8-core Mac Pro as soon as it has the Stoakley-Seaburg multi-core memory management chipset onboard. I have never waivered from that position and have only pointed out that the current first interation of 8-cores is missing that anticipated and wanted as a minimum requirement for me to pull the trigger since November '06 element.All I am saying is that complaining on these forums about how the mac pro is a bad deal is getting old. If you are going to wait then wait. This is like the 10th thread that has popped up in the past few days. Mac Pro is a great deal. In a year it will be faster and cheaper. That happens EVERY year. You can wait forever with that mentality.
I don't see why you need to bash us for waiting for what we know is coming next in only a matter of a few more months at most. I have looked at the cost ten times. It's over $6,000 fully loaded. I am not going to dump more than $6,000 for last year's first generation motherboard no matter how fast you think it is already. Barefeets has shown that the current Mac Pro has serious memory mismanagement leaks when it comes to multitasking multithreaded applications all at once. That is because it is missing SS and Leopard. As long as the hardware is not SS enabled this will always be the case.From The Tech Report First Look article by Geoff Gasior November 13 said:The Stoakley platform is based on a 90-nano shrink of the Bensley architecture. Bensley's dual 1,066/1,333MHz front side busses return, this time with support for upcoming 45-nano Penryn chips. Stoakley also features plenty of PCI Express, with 44 lanes of PCIe joined by a pair of second-generation PCIe x16 links. Generation one PCIe links can be used to hook into a variety of peripheral chips to provide Serial ATA RAID, Gigabit Ethernet, and PCI-X connectivity.
Seaburg is the codename for Stoakley's Memory Controller Hub (MCH), which features four channels of FB-DIMMs at 533 or 667MHz. Up to 128GB of memory is supporteddouble that of Bensley's Blackford MCH. Seaburg also offers an enhanced memory controller that Intel says improves sustained throughput by 25% and a larger, smarter snoop filter optimized for quad-core chips.
The snoop filter stores coherency information on all of the cache lines mapped to system memory. The Blackford MCH's snoop filter isn't really optimized for quad-core designs; affinity groups are tied to each front-side bus, but quad-core CPUs add additional agents to those busses. With Seaburg, Intel has designed a snoop filter with four affinity groupsone for each last level cache on the front-side bus. Seaburg's snoop filter also features a new eviction algorithm, and its size has been increased to ensure complete coverage for future quad core-chips that Intel says will feature larger caches.
All I am saying is that complaining on these forums about how the mac pro is a bad deal is getting old. If you are going to wait then wait. This is like the 10th thread that has popped up in the past few days. Mac Pro is a great deal. In a year it will be faster and cheaper. That happens EVERY year. You can wait forever with that mentality.
In fact we are all congratulating you for your courage to do so.
No. When it was released, it was a 'great deal'. Now, it is a 'crappy' deal.
When it was released, you couldn't even HOME BUILD a PC with those components for cheaper.
Now, you can do that and more. On top of that, there is the issue of the video cards being 18 months old and only 1GB RAM.
Therefore: crappy deal.
Not to mention, it'll go all 8 core within the next 2 months after Intel's price drops, so you'd really be quite the fool to buy now, unless of course the updates don't matter to you and you need the machine immediately.
Crappy deal? Where else can you get an 8 core system at 3ghz? Thats as cutting edge as it gets seeing as how only apple has the 3ghz quad core chip. Whats apple going to do invent a new mboard?
Just getting sick and tired of all the "I want a better mac pro for cheaper" posts. You get over it. Jeez. Never heard so much whining in my life.
If you dont NEED it now, buying the Mac Pro now is simply unwise.
Some people want Stoakely-Seaburg. Some people want a better spec'd base configuration. Some people want DDR3 instead of FB-DIMMs. And most people, including myself, want better, current, and readily available video cards.