IF they do announce nMP...who's the their target?

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by pat500000, May 31, 2016.

  1. pat500000 macrumors 604

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #1
    As WWDC is coming near, If they do announce nMP, what type of customers do you think are they targeting for? FCPX users still? Or are they reaching out to people who use other programs like some 3d programs? Healthcare?Scientists? Photographers/Artists?

    When I was first introduced to mac pro..(G5), I remember seeing people doing some fascinating stuff like Adobe products, film making, music...etc. As the time has changed dramatically...would this be a niche product?
     
  2. ActionableMango macrumors 604

    ActionableMango

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    #2
    Hard to say without seeing what it is.

    But Phil Schiller said the new Mac Pro was the design for the next 10 years, so I imagine it will continue to be what it is now, just updated.
     
  3. jbarley macrumors 68030

    jbarley

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Location:
    Vancouver Island
    #3
    so which was it, a Mac Pro or a G5? ;)
     
  4. pat500000 thread starter macrumors 604

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #4
    lol sorry I meant G5.
     
  5. edanuff macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
  6. AidenShaw macrumors P6

    AidenShaw

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Location:
    The Peninsula
    #6
    +1

    I wonder, however:
    • Is the target people who have the MP6,1 for what it can do and need to upgrade for a bit more?
    • Or is the target people who bought the MP6,1 because it was shiny and will immediately grab an MP7,1 because it's shinier?
    Many of Apple's product updates seem to aim for the latter.

    https://www.facebook.com/shinycomputers
     
  7. pat500000 thread starter macrumors 604

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #7
    Based on what you said, it sounds like it's gonna be another "disposable" computer.
    --- Post Merged, May 31, 2016 ---
    Those are good questions. Probably.....shiny thing. I don't know to be quite honest, but it may be another "disposable" computer (meaning unable to upgrade GPU).
     
  8. rockyromero macrumors 6502

    rockyromero

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2015
    #8
    That would be me.

    Business dictates incremental continuity.

    Hopefully, exponential continuity.
     
  9. Mago macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Location:
    Beyond the Thunderdome
    #9
    VR Content Producers should be a new target, maybe machine learningsince it's an area to develope for use on multiple platforms: iOS, IoT, Manufacture, and Old dogs as Data Mining.
     
  10. mattspace macrumors 6502

    mattspace

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2013
    Location:
    Australia
    #10
    Unless Apple is going to make the GPUs of the next model backwards compatible to ensure ongoing spares for burnouts in the 6,1, It wouldn't surprise me to see Apple adopt an iPhone-like 3-year (average refresh / Applecare cycle) continuous lease program for the Mac Pro going forward, that could get them a stock of refurb parts for what are low volume, and probably relatively low spare availability machines.
     
  11. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #11
    Apple has so far remained on the sidelines with the burgeoning VR market, their machines just not powerful enough to drive the goggles. This may be one way Apple gets their foot in the door.
     
  12. pat500000 thread starter macrumors 604

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #12
    Question: is this going to be one of those "disposable" product? Meaning un-upgradeable like GPU?
     
  13. h9826790 macrumors 604

    h9826790

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2014
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #13
    I think it's far too easy to produce a VR ready computer now. Just need some mid to top end hardware to achieve that.

    If there is a 7,1, it's hard to believe that none of the 7,1 can be config to drive the VR. However, IMO, even Apple use "1st VR Ready Mac" as a selling point on 7,1, it may still only means VR ready on the spec, but totally lack of software support.
     
  14. owbp, Jun 1, 2016
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2016

    owbp macrumors 6502a

    owbp

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    #14
    That would be really embarrassing:"Look what it can do when in Bootcamp! No VR my ass!":D
     
  15. rockyromero macrumors 6502

    rockyromero

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2015
    #15
    I'll take this as someone else's disposable.

    Probably for the next 5 years.
     
  16. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #16
    Thats if you count on all laptops and iMac devices as disposable.
     
  17. pat500000 thread starter macrumors 604

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #17
    im sure used one will be out real quick.
     
  18. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #18
    Given Apple's prior history, I'd say yes.
     
  19. pat500000 thread starter macrumors 604

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #19
    I guess we can include that as well.
     
  20. antonis macrumors 68000

    antonis

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    #20
    Apple knows that many cMP owners were not convinced to switch to 6,1 in 2013. I assume that they hope the last of them will eventually go for the 7,1 now.
     
  21. h9826790 macrumors 604

    h9826790

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2014
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #21
    Yeah, hopefully they spend 3 years to figure out the "why" and make the 7,1 a real replacement for the 5,1.

    Now, almost all Apple products has difference size / spec for different user demand (iPhone SE vs Plus, iPad /mini / Pro, Apple Watch 38 vs 42mm, iMac 21.5 vs 27", MacBook / Air / Pro with few differences size). Why they can't just make the tower and the cylinder exist at the same time? Just like the MacBook and the MacBook Pro.

    In fact, the iPhone SE makes me believe that they have no more new idea. Only want to use their current stuff to squeeze out every single cents from the public. And willing to go backward (from 4.7 and 5.5" back to 4"). If they go backward on the Mac Pro case (and didn't cancel the 6,1), I think it will make lots of Mac Pro user happy.

    Of course, I don't think it will really happen, but it's not totally impossible either.
     
  22. AidenShaw macrumors P6

    AidenShaw

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2003
    Location:
    The Peninsula
    #22
    How could Apple determine this? Where would they get the information?
     
  23. grahamperrin macrumors 601

    grahamperrin

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    #23
    We are reliably informed that nMP will target an ng of acronym lovers.
     
  24. ActionableMango macrumors 604

    ActionableMango

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    #24
    If the 6,1 wasn't acceptable to someone, I don't see why a 7,1 would be (assuming similar design). But I guess we'll see.
     
  25. h9826790 macrumors 604

    h9826790

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2014
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #25
    It seems not too hard for them. If they can determine the new OSX, iOS, iPhone adoption rate (I never find out how they do the stat, but occationally see this kind of data on magazines), I will assume they can determine the new Mac Pro adaption rate as well. Of course, the number may be inaccurate, but it's possible.

    E.g. If the Apple server can ident a computer every time when the machine connect to it (e.g. via AppStore). Then they can have some rough figure (e.g. the cMP vs nMP of downloading El Capitan ratio is about 1:1, then it means half or more cMP user still refuse to adopt to the nMP, etc).

    Of course, this kind of stat may not even done by Apple. But I will be very surprise if Apple didn't monitor their products' adoption rate.
     

Share This Page