Yes. Better than a 2 year contract $100 per month.
I always pay out for the iPhone. It's the cheaper way.
It depends on the country and the plans and networks available.
In the USA, carriers have pushed family plans the past 6-7 years. Carriers are now a victim of their own success in trying to brag with carrier has the "most customers".
Over 60% of Americans are on family plans. 88% of Americans are on a family plan or have a discount from employer.
So the single line users are the real ones getting ripped off with the post paid carriers like Verizon or ATT. But single line users are the minority these days.
That's why Verzon decided to change their corporate earnings report 2 quarters ago to reflect "revenue per account" rather than "revenue per line".
Lines 2-5 generate less in profits to the post paid carriers....but lines 2-5 mean savings to the general public.
There has got to be some give and take with subsidized phones with carriers.
Which one blinks first if they try to lower the iPhone subsidy? Verizon and ATT can collude together to lower the subsidy and start charging $399 for the iphone on 2 year contract.
But they know the federal regulators will figure it out quickly and those duoploies will be disbanded quickly just like the original AT&T in 1984.
So the answer to who would pay $600 for an iPhone. Not many people on post paid plans would pay $600 for an iPhone if they are getting zero discount in terms of post paid pricing plans.
USA post paid carriers know that. Why do you think T-Mobile USA has failed so badly the past 2-3 years losing customers. Americans aren't as dumb as you think. They know family plans means savings.
I have 4 lines (2 smartphones with unlimited data (throttled with ATT). Unlimited text, 700 minutes with rollover and A-line. I pay $155 total and that's with a subsidy. Many people with family plans are in a simliar boat as me (24% discoutn also).