I have an M1 13 MBP (8GB, 512 SSD), totally love it and easily meets all my needs. The 15 MacBook Air is also a great machine. Previously owned a Mac mini, totally loved that, and if you want a headless machine, pick your own display and keyboard - that is the way. Mac Studio is nice, but way overkill for me.
I hear whining on this forum that 8GB is not enough RAM for "pro" apps without defining them. Yes you can construct a case where you max out ram and it could slow down, but that is pretty much a contrived instance, specifically to prove a point. I decided to go with 8GB after I had 16 GB in my previous Mac and never used it. Using Activity monitor, I have never created memory pressure with 8GB. Of course I don't use chrome which has a incompetently bad memory model.
So what do I do in my use case? 1) Safari, Safari Technology Preview, and Brave for browsers, 2) handbrake including running filters and upscaling, 3) iMovie for video enhancing, 3) Pages, Numbers and Keynote, 4) Xcode, script editor and shortcuts, 5) Preview and Adobe Acrobat. A common theme - built in applications, unless there is a reason to use another for a specific task (and yes, I stay away from known problems like chrome). Not a Pro workflow by any means, but my MBP works for me just great.
So, if you are concerned about 8GB because of pro apps, ask yourself what are they, and what are the motivations of those testing the use case, are they making a point, and devising a test to prove it - probably? I am not saying in the least that there are not "pro" apps that require a lot of RAM and need more than 8GB, and if you use them, well - enough said.
Finally, I am in the long list of people who think that Apple overcharges for RAM and SSD capacity. With the chip shortage more or less over, isn't it about time to make the cost of upgrades more affordable and competitive?
I hear whining on this forum that 8GB is not enough RAM for "pro" apps without defining them. Yes you can construct a case where you max out ram and it could slow down, but that is pretty much a contrived instance, specifically to prove a point. I decided to go with 8GB after I had 16 GB in my previous Mac and never used it. Using Activity monitor, I have never created memory pressure with 8GB. Of course I don't use chrome which has a incompetently bad memory model.
So what do I do in my use case? 1) Safari, Safari Technology Preview, and Brave for browsers, 2) handbrake including running filters and upscaling, 3) iMovie for video enhancing, 3) Pages, Numbers and Keynote, 4) Xcode, script editor and shortcuts, 5) Preview and Adobe Acrobat. A common theme - built in applications, unless there is a reason to use another for a specific task (and yes, I stay away from known problems like chrome). Not a Pro workflow by any means, but my MBP works for me just great.
So, if you are concerned about 8GB because of pro apps, ask yourself what are they, and what are the motivations of those testing the use case, are they making a point, and devising a test to prove it - probably? I am not saying in the least that there are not "pro" apps that require a lot of RAM and need more than 8GB, and if you use them, well - enough said.
Finally, I am in the long list of people who think that Apple overcharges for RAM and SSD capacity. With the chip shortage more or less over, isn't it about time to make the cost of upgrades more affordable and competitive?