Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Counter said:
My theory is that 'leaks' on Apple's site itself are done on purpose.

A company of Apples size isn't uploading parts of their new website by clicking the 'put' button in Fetch.

I have had similar suspicions. And there's precedent for it, too. At least with other companies. Nikon does this quite frequently.

I recall an "accidentally" published page showing photos of the Nikon D200 digital SLR several months ago, long before an official product announcement was made and at a time when most people in the industry were speculating about the possibility of a D200. The D200 page was quickly pulled (naturally!) but not before several keen observers snapped up the page, archived it and posted it on other sites. People who were in the know were buzzing about the D200 and were excited that all of their speculation had been confirmed. Word of mouth spread so quickly that when Nikon did announce the D200 is was a mere formality and certainly no suprise to many photographers. Talk about max ad value for very little money!

So with iWeb, well....what better way to generate a little buzz before MWSF than to throw a little hamburger to the lions to give them a tease taste?

Although there's no way for us to conclusively prove that this iWeb leak was anything other than an accident, I'm quite sure that Apple knows how to push the buttons of the "rumor community" and manipulate it to some degree to get people talking and squawking. And yes, I also have a hard time believing it was an accident to begin with. Don't they lock/password protect files before "go time"?? You'd think they would have some fairly stringent security safeguards in place for these sensitive areas.

PS - Ya gotta hand it to RealMac and Karelia. They're probably a bit more nervous than they are letting on, but both companies seem more determined than ever to see if small size and speed can kill. They may be right.
 
A New .Mac for Keynote

From .Mac website :

.Mac will be undergoing scheduled maintenance from 7:00 AM to 12:00 PM PST on 1/10/06. All .Mac services will be affected. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Last Updated: 1/6/06
 
Peace said:
From .Mac website :

.Mac will be undergoing scheduled maintenance from 7:00 AM to 12:00 PM PST on 1/10/06. All .Mac services will be affected. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Last Updated: 1/6/06

Normally I don't like scheduled maintenance, but this time all I can say is "Cool!" :cool:

They should have said "We apologize for the inconvenience, but trust us, it should be worth the wait ;)"

:D
 
Peace said:
From .Mac website :

.Mac will be undergoing scheduled maintenance from 7:00 AM to 12:00 PM PST on 1/10/06. All .Mac services will be affected. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Last Updated: 1/6/06

Nice...:D
 

Attachments

  • dotmac.jpg
    dotmac.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 673
Really Different .Mac

I was watching the swf on .Mac and it included FTP in the animation.Something members don't have currently..

All this new stuff will make .Mac more attractive..
 
Front Row

I'm sure no one reads this cause it's the last page... but Front Row sure was not on that list that leaked iWeb. I guess it's not going to be bundled with iLife '06? I hope I have to eat my words on this one.
 
oscarbrown4 said:
I'm sure no one reads this cause it's the last page... but Front Row sure was not on that list that leaked iWeb. I guess it's not going to be bundled with iLife '06? I hope I have to eat my words on this one.

Yeah, that leak gave me doubts on ever seeing Front Row 2.0 on my PowerBook. :( It could come with the rumored media center Mac mini, though. :)
 
Peace said:
I was watching the swf on .Mac and it included FTP in the animation.Something members don't have currently..

All this new stuff will make .Mac more attractive..

Peace - that flash animation has been on the .Mac web site since the last time .Mac was updated (Sept. I think). The point of the animation is to show that you don't have to know PHP, FTP, HTML, etc to build a web site—you can do it the "Apple way" with .Mac.
 
i think iWeb will have something to do with .Mac. A website editor hopefully. the fact that service is down for .mac means something.
 
joshuawaire said:
Peace - that flash animation has been on the .Mac web site since the last time .Mac was updated (Sept. I think). The point of the animation is to show that you don't have to know PHP, FTP, HTML, etc to build a web site—you can do it the "Apple way" with .Mac.

Ahah! Thanks.Guess I hadn't noticed it.D'OH!:eek:
 
I did a quick search on google, "site:apple.com iweb".

Wasn't expecting anything but this result came up.

I don't actually know what it is, its from Nov. last year so its probably outdated but it contained the word iweb near the bottom.

Probably nothing but there you go, my quick search for iweb.
 
robinmurphy said:
I did a quick search on google, "site:apple.com iweb".

Wasn't expecting anything but this result came up.

I don't actually know what it is, its from Nov. last year so its probably outdated but it contained the word iweb near the bottom.

Probably nothing but there you go, my quick search for iweb.

The guy who posted this on their forums is also a MacRumors member, he posted this link earlier in the conversation. It'd be interesting if they used his idea!
 
oscarbrown4 said:
I'm sure no one reads this cause it's the last page... but Front Row sure was not on that list that leaked iWeb. I guess it's not going to be bundled with iLife '06? I hope I have to eat my words on this one.

Considering the 10.4.4 update was rumored to be coming a couple of weeks ago, I thinking (OK, hoping) that Front Row is going to be a part of a 10.4.4 update available on Tuesday. Apple isn't usually one to make new features retroactive to old devices, but a guy can dream.
 
yankeefan24 said:
i think iWeb will have something to do with .Mac. A website editor hopefully. the fact that service is down for .mac means something.

Does anyone have or has anyone seen posted a coherent theory for how subscribed TV content would be integrated with .Mac? I saw a rumor posted to this effect, but I don't really get why .Mac would be necessary for Apple to direct high-quality video content to a set-top Mac mini.
 
Whilst I initially though the iWeb App would be a web design applicaiton, after reading a few of the posts here, I'm starting to lean towards a 'Administration' type of app.

One that brings all of the iLife applications together in one place on your idisk or webspace.

Secondly, I've always wondered how far the iTunes name can go. If they put full movies on there to download, then keeping the itunes name seems a bit daft, and iMovie is already used.

Maybe iWeb will a general interface for all the different media channels that .Mac or Apple will have. A music section, Homepage section, Movies section etc.

Almost like a personal web portal.
 
Something tells me iWeb is going to be like Dreamweaver. An addon to .Mac where they will allow people to build more feature rich websites. Something akin to wordpress, maybe?
 
lpshean said:
Something tells me iWeb is going to be like Dreamweaver. An addon to .Mac where they will allow people to build more feature rich websites. Something akin to wordpress, maybe?


so what would iweb be to those that don't have a .mac subscription? Would it just be a total waste?
 
WindowsSUCKSX5 said:
so what would iweb be to those that don't have a .mac subscription? Would it just be a total waste?

No i don't think so. Maybe its sorta optimized in a way for .Mac.... but it could be used to design webpages too for those who uses things like lycos. Its probably some ultra user friendly thing, where you drag and drop pictures, rezise them, add movies or music, type, and iWeb will convert it automatically to html, or php or something like that, and export it.

Or then again, i might just be talking bull. :eek:
 
lpshean said:
Something tells me iWeb is going to be like Dreamweaver. An addon to .Mac where they will allow people to build more feature rich websites. Something akin to wordpress, maybe?

Damn, I just bought Dreamweaver... :rolleyes:


I think it will be about Podcasting software intergration, both audio and video.
 
liquidh2o said:
count me as another person who was disappointed when front row wasn't on the list :(


It might just be a feature included with the updated mac os x on the new computers. it is likely not gonna be with ilife 06
 
the-fish said:
That iTunes 4.9 reference... fishy, that's fishy...

I'm disinclined to get my hopes up... errrrrrr........ iLife '06, yes. iWeb? Hrrmmmph...

Nope. Not at all. It was referencing v4.9 as the minimum requirement for people wanting to use your Podcasts. Podcasting was added then.
 
D3LM3L said:
I'm thinking Apple's iWeb will be similarly done as CSSEdit by Macrabbit. It will be a completely drag-n-drop GUI for webpages, including all the CSS/XHTML blah blah blah that modern websites use. The websites will be coded nicely, just like RapidWeaver makes their's, for example. But, the way iWeb will be like CSSEdit, is that it will be able to do webpage editing from the GUI or from manual coding- and the app will recognize and dynamically update from anything you manually type in. This is just how CSSEdit works- you can either edit CSS from the GUI mode, or switch it to source code mode and you can do everything yourself, and it recognizes everything immediately.

While I really like CSSEdit, I still think it's a level above the average user who doesn't even know what a stylesheet is. Apple would hide such detail.

Also, unless Rapidweaver has changed recently, the code it generated wasn't exactly the best with nested tables and images for the menus. Have they changed that? It's a good app for the beginner but I found the code a bit iffy and the layout and design a little rigid. I've much greater hopes for Sandvox to take the crown there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.