Myth: If you are in the professional world, you need a Macbook Pro.
Two months ago, I had two computers. A triple monitor 2011 27" i7 iMac, and a 2010 11" Macbook Air. For obvious reasons, my reasoning was to use the MBA for going to coffee shops, sitting in front of the TV, and playing games. The iMac, on the other hand, kept food on my table... or so I thought.
75% of the time I ended up using my 11" MBA for doing all of my design, not because it was faster (of course its not), but because it was far more convenient. This a 2010 base model 11" Air, mind you. Not exactly a speed freak. However, unless I was working on a 10 foot poster, it would run just as fast as my iMac. The main problem, the tiny screen.
This led to my current configuration.
I realized that even a 2010 MBA had the power to run Photoshop, Illustrator, and inDesign all at the same time. Working in Aperture was a drag though. The problem was the screen size. Fast forward to 2012, and the new Macbook Air's are FOUR times as fast as in 2010. Aperture, I thought, should not be a problem now. Screen size? Well use an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse for that matter when sitting in a desk.
So here I am, a full time graphic designer, working to keep food on my plate (not using photoshop to make memes). And I can re-assure you, ALL YOU NEED IS A MACBOOK AIR. I chose the 13" this time, for slightly more real estate and longer battery life, without much added weight AT ALL. I went with the i5, because it is more than enough to run everything, I promise. Upgraded the ram to 8GB (DO THIS), and called it a day. Most storage I keep offsite in a 1.5TB enclosure, since I don't use much when working on a single project. I couldn't ask for more. Portability is there, power is there, and a giant screen is there when I need it (connected to my external monitor in my desk).
If you do ANYTHING less intensive than Graphic Design [surf the web, use it for school, play games (to a certain extent)], I promise you, don't spend the money on a MBP. You will loose portability and a whole lot of cash - only to gain nothing. The only reason I see anyone buying a MBP or iMac these days is to do HEAVY video editing. Because even now, with my i5 8gb MBA, I can do all the photo editing in the world [even in a power hogging application such as Aperture].
Needless to say, my iMac is gone and I have consolidated into a single computer. The 2012 Macbook Air's are beasts, despite what all 16 year old boys who only look at benchmark tests tell you.
I'm in the professional world, and I can tell for one that I could not use my MBA alone to do my work, far from it.
This is valuable information, can you tell what type of work the Air isn't good for?
I would say 3D modelling with hires texture might stretch the 512meg video ram of the mba. Video encoding, especially h264, would surelly lag on a dual core low power cpu like the mba has. I'm not saying it can't be done, just that it will be way slower than on a computer with a dGPU with double the vram and that h264 would run quicker on a 4-core regular cpu.
It will only begin to struggle when you do heavier video editing or get in the 3D rendering territory but anything you described should be fine.
I look at pc's and macs this way : read a magazine, watch a film or listen to some music from 3/4/5 years ago. Does it look or sound worse than any film/mag/music released this year?
99% of the time the answer is a big fat no. Now consider the fact that today's MacBook Air will probably (with exception of an Avatar like Hollywood blockbuster) be of a higher spec and performance than the kit the pro's used just a few years back to produce what you gave just watched, read or listened to. Then ask yourself, do I really need to pay double for something 'better'?
Not going to get into the p*ssing match that seems to simmer in a thread like this, but just to put in my experience. I'm a magazine art director, I layout an 80pg magazine along with doing web/print layout and design as well as a great deal of photography (I do VERY archaic photo processes from the 1800s but always end up scanning them in as well as scanning in my hasselblad film for creating Digital Negatives for usage in said processes).
I sold my 13" 2011 MBpro in order to buy a 13" 2012 MBA back when they were released, this was meant to just be a handy computer to take to grad school and for working on the road when needed. Got the 8GB RAM version. Then I ended up selling my workhorse MacPro that I had sitting at my desk. I figured a Mac Mini would be more than enough. I got a decked out Mini with 16GB RAM and installed an SSD.
After about a month it hit me that the MBA is damn near identical in speed and experience when hooked up to the same 24" Cinema Display.
Sold the Mini and pocketed the money and now the Air is my "Do-All" and it hasn't let me* down in the least bit.
*completely know that this IS NOT true for everyone, but my computer usage is pretty intense at times so thought it worth chiming in and sharing.
Hey!
Soon i will be getting my first MBA which ill be using to sketch in sketchbook pro 6.. only looking for the 11 inch entry level as i already have a PC.. just want something more portable and light...
would this be powerful enough?
sorry in advance if this is a stupid question just wanna make im not wasting my time/money
That too. What this shows is how good current computers actually are. The difference between the slowest and fastest machines are becoming less big by the year. The Air is a very powerful machine in a very sleek formfactor. With the 8GB and the sata-3 ssd it is good enough for a lot of people, like the ones that want to run 1 or more virtual machines on it (like I do). They are selling like hot cakes.
However, it doesn't mean that the Air is the answer for everybody. There are still many scenarios where an iMac, Mac Pro, MBP, etc. are better. When you want to play games that require proper GPUs than these machines are better than the Air as they offer more powerful GPUs.
Myth: If you are in the professional world, you need a Macbook Pro.
Two months ago, I had two computers. A triple monitor 2011 27" i7 iMac, and a 2010 11" Macbook Air. For obvious reasons, my reasoning was to use the MBA for going to coffee shops, sitting in front of the TV, and playing games. The iMac, on the other hand, kept food on my table... or so I thought.
75% of the time I ended up using my 11" MBA for doing all of my design, not because it was faster (of course its not), but because it was far more convenient. This a 2010 base model 11" Air, mind you. Not exactly a speed freak. However, unless I was working on a 10 foot poster, it would run just as fast as my iMac. The main problem, the tiny screen.
This led to my current configuration.
I realized that even a 2010 MBA had the power to run Photoshop, Illustrator, and inDesign all at the same time. Working in Aperture was a drag though. The problem was the screen size. Fast forward to 2012, and the new Macbook Air's are FOUR times as fast as in 2010. Aperture, I thought, should not be a problem now. Screen size? Well use an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse for that matter when sitting in a desk.
So here I am, a full time graphic designer, working to keep food on my plate (not using photoshop to make memes). And I can re-assure you, ALL YOU NEED IS A MACBOOK AIR. I chose the 13" this time, for slightly more real estate and longer battery life, without much added weight AT ALL. I went with the i5, because it is more than enough to run everything, I promise. Upgraded the ram to 8GB (DO THIS), and called it a day. Most storage I keep offsite in a 1.5TB enclosure, since I don't use much when working on a single project. I couldn't ask for more. Portability is there, power is there, and a giant screen is there when I need it (connected to my external monitor in my desk).
If you do ANYTHING less intensive than Graphic Design [surf the web, use it for school, play games (to a certain extent)], I promise you, don't spend the money on a MBP. You will loose portability and a whole lot of cash - only to gain nothing. The only reason I see anyone buying a MBP or iMac these days is to do HEAVY video editing. Because even now, with my i5 8gb MBA, I can do all the photo editing in the world [even in a power hogging application such as Aperture].
Needless to say, my iMac is gone and I have consolidated into a single computer. The 2012 Macbook Air's are beasts, despite what all 16 year old boys who only look at benchmark tests tell you.
I know that by now you probably already made your purchase (sorry for the incredible DELAY!!!) but for anyone looking to buy a MBA and happening to stumble upon this thread - I would not get an 11". Honestly, its just too damn small, the text becomes tiny! I would know, I had one for two years and then *hesitated* to move to a 13" but by god I'm glad I did.
For anyone else wondering if my 13" is still holding up to my tasks as a graphic designer - you damn bet it is! Sure, sometimes I have to do things a little slower or "place" things into illustrator so the file doesn't become buggy, but those are tiny trade offs for the amazing portability that it provides me on a daily basis. Now, I wish they made the 13" with mac pro power, sure. THAT would be nice, but honestly, for 2013 I am perfectly fine and can see myself keeping this machine another two years at least (got it about a year ago now in 2012, with 8GB and i5).
Myth: If you are in the professional world, you need a Macbook Pro.
Two months ago, I had two computers. A triple monitor 2011 27" i7 iMac, and a 2010 11" Macbook Air. For obvious reasons, my reasoning was to use the MBA for going to coffee shops, sitting in front of the TV, and playing games. The iMac, on the other hand, kept food on my table... or so I thought.
75% of the time I ended up using my 11" MBA for doing all of my design, not because it was faster (of course its not), but because it was far more convenient. This a 2010 base model 11" Air, mind you. Not exactly a speed freak. However, unless I was working on a 10 foot poster, it would run just as fast as my iMac. The main problem, the tiny screen.
This led to my current configuration.
I realized that even a 2010 MBA had the power to run Photoshop, Illustrator, and inDesign all at the same time. Working in Aperture was a drag though. The problem was the screen size. Fast forward to 2012, and the new Macbook Air's are FOUR times as fast as in 2010. Aperture, I thought, should not be a problem now. Screen size? Well use an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse for that matter when sitting in a desk.
So here I am, a full time graphic designer, working to keep food on my plate (not using photoshop to make memes). And I can re-assure you, ALL YOU NEED IS A MACBOOK AIR. I chose the 13" this time, for slightly more real estate and longer battery life, without much added weight AT ALL. I went with the i5, because it is more than enough to run everything, I promise. Upgraded the ram to 8GB (DO THIS), and called it a day. Most storage I keep offsite in a 1.5TB enclosure, since I don't use much when working on a single project. I couldn't ask for more. Portability is there, power is there, and a giant screen is there when I need it (connected to my external monitor in my desk).
If you do ANYTHING less intensive than Graphic Design [surf the web, use it for school, play games (to a certain extent)], I promise you, don't spend the money on a MBP. You will loose portability and a whole lot of cash - only to gain nothing. The only reason I see anyone buying a MBP or iMac these days is to do HEAVY video editing. Because even now, with my i5 8gb MBA, I can do all the photo editing in the world [even in a power hogging application such as Aperture].
Needless to say, my iMac is gone and I have consolidated into a single computer. The 2012 Macbook Air's are beasts, despite what all 16 year old boys who only look at benchmark tests tell you.
That entirely depends on what you do with the computer and which software you use. There are more applications today that take use of things like the general computing power of the GPU, most seen in the science world. There are also quite a few photo editing software that use the GPU for some calculations just to speed things up. What we are seeing here is making much better use of every computer component. It's not like the GPU is for graphics stuff only. This has benefits to anybody: consumer, prosumer, scientist, somebody from a corporate environment.I'd go as far as to say that the two least important aspects of a computer these days (for me) are CPU/GPU speed, and battery life. That's the difference between a consumer/prosumer market and a corporate environment.
That entirely depends on what you do with the computer and which software you use. There are more applications today that take use of things like the general computing power of the GPU, most seen in the science world. There are also quite a few photo editing software that use the GPU for some calculations just to speed things up. What we are seeing here is making much better use of every computer component. It's not like the GPU is for graphics stuff only. This has benefits to anybody: consumer, prosumer, scientist, somebody from a corporate environment.
Battery life is definitely something you are wrong about. Nearly anybody who uses a notebook does so because they are mobile. Battery life is a very essential part of being mobile. If we take a look at businesses then we see lots of people who travel, there are even scientist who do this for their research. And of course there are the large group of students around the world who use a notebook. For them battery life is essential.
However, the cpu seems to be at its peak. There just not that many workloads that benefit from a very fast cpu. If you do have such a workload then clearly the Air isn't for you. Same if you require a powerful GPU or more then 8GB of memory. If not then the Air is a very powerful little machine. I think it is a very impressive machine and with the upcoming Haswell it will become even more impressive.
Myth: If you are in the professional world, you need a Macbook Pro.
Two months ago, I had two computers. A triple monitor 2011 27" i7 iMac, and a 2010 11" Macbook Air. For obvious reasons, my reasoning was to use the MBA for going to coffee shops, sitting in front of the TV, and playing games. The iMac, on the other hand, kept food on my table... or so I thought.
75% of the time I ended up using my 11" MBA for doing all of my design, not because it was faster (of course its not), but because it was far more convenient. This a 2010 base model 11" Air, mind you. Not exactly a speed freak. However, unless I was working on a 10 foot poster, it would run just as fast as my iMac. The main problem, the tiny screen.
This led to my current configuration.
I realized that even a 2010 MBA had the power to run Photoshop, Illustrator, and inDesign all at the same time. Working in Aperture was a drag though. The problem was the screen size. Fast forward to 2012, and the new Macbook Air's are FOUR times as fast as in 2010. Aperture, I thought, should not be a problem now. Screen size? Well use an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse for that matter when sitting in a desk.
So here I am, a full time graphic designer, working to keep food on my plate (not using photoshop to make memes). And I can re-assure you, ALL YOU NEED IS A MACBOOK AIR. I chose the 13" this time, for slightly more real estate and longer battery life, without much added weight AT ALL. I went with the i5, because it is more than enough to run everything, I promise. Upgraded the ram to 8GB (DO THIS), and called it a day. Most storage I keep offsite in a 1.5TB enclosure, since I don't use much when working on a single project. I couldn't ask for more. Portability is there, power is there, and a giant screen is there when I need it (connected to my external monitor in my desk).
If you do ANYTHING less intensive than Graphic Design [surf the web, use it for school, play games (to a certain extent)], I promise you, don't spend the money on a MBP. You will loose portability and a whole lot of cash - only to gain nothing. The only reason I see anyone buying a MBP or iMac these days is to do HEAVY video editing. Because even now, with my i5 8gb MBA, I can do all the photo editing in the world [even in a power hogging application such as Aperture].
Needless to say, my iMac is gone and I have consolidated into a single computer. The 2012 Macbook Air's are beasts, despite what all 16 year old boys who only look at benchmark tests tell you.