Alright. Jeeze. Ill use correct grammar.
You must be referring to my comment. Look at it again. Read what you said. Something about it "slipping out" at inopportune moments.
Alright. Jeeze. Ill use correct grammar.
And yet you disprove your own point in the very same paragraph.I think "you're an ignorant, myopic ignoramous" sounds much funnier and exhibits more thought than "*** you, you're an *******". It certainly catches my attention much more (despite being redundant and repetitive
)
I swore off (!) swearing about 11 years ago (well, I guess that depends on your definition of swear words, but definitely no s--- or f----). At first I kept catching myself, but it becomes a habit and eventually I don't even think about it. I don't know what would blurt out of my mouth if I stubbed my toe, but I know what it definitely WON'T be.
I did it for a couple of reasons. I do work with kids and youth in a leadership capacity, and so I try to present a good example (a higher standard, I guess), and it also makes a good object lesson when I deal with kids who swear excessively and need to learn to tone it down. (I don't particularly appreciate hearing it, but I don't mind the odd word slipping out here and there. But there reaches a point where I say, "Ok, that's enough".) Anyone who tells me "it's impossible, I can't help it" hears my story.
Besides, anyone can use the "usual" swear words... it's a fun opportunity to find more colorful, humorous phrases to replace them with (e.g. "frack" for you BSG fans). I like your example, actually
I notice it's much harder to keep it down after watching profanity-filled movies or hanging out with people that swear a lot. Repeatable phrases start rattling around in my head, and are that much closer to popping out of my mouth. I guess it really is "garbage in, garbage out."
I agree with you that swearing does have its place in the English language, but the simple fact that you (hopefully) wouldn't curse liberally in front of your mum, grandma, professors, boss, the Prime Minister or President, etc, likely means you really do believe that curse words are at the bottom rung. You also said you wouldn't use them in front of children in case they start using them in front of an authority figure.
Educated people may swear but it's the more highly educated who know that excessive swearing makes you sound like a piece of trash.
If a person is really trying to swear off swearing for whatever reason (other than avoiding frustrating parental efforts), how effective are euphamisms really? Just because someone uses frick or frack or flip or any other the countless replacements I have heard, doesn't mean that they have taken the time to give their thoughts and time more respect and effort. Violating the spirit of the effort is the cowardly way to comply with the letter of the effort (except as noted above).
I have noticed that as I have worked to control my language, I have found that I have learned to exercise greater controln over my emotions. I can cite no stat or study, but it seems that we have had more rage and temper-contol-leading-to-violence as people have become more accepting of swearing. Quickly enough I even noticed that the "need" to swear has disappeared - I tend to wear my comments on my sleeve and try to avoid euphamisms in speech, and my language has been clean for quite a long time.
sometimes speaking at a ridiculously high "level" of vocabulary, if you wish to use it that way, is not only bad, but actually insulting to the people you're talking to.
I suppose level of words, the way I was using it, was slightly misunderstood. No word is inherently better than another word, and that's what I meant, but in our language, there are those very common words, and the not-so-common words. They're all words, and the only thing that makes one "higher" or "lower" than another is a completely arbitrary guideline.
I understand where you're coming from, and I understand how my point is trying to be undermined by comparing Dr. Seuss to Shakespeare, but that's really not my point.
Here's a better example than the Myopic ignoramous one...Neither of these sound "educated," per se, but which gets the point across better, and sounds more "mature." (depending on how you're using it): "You're a stupid poopie head." or "You're a dumb ****."
We're not telling you that you should start using words with a minimum of nine letters; we're saying that using words with offensive and/or vulgar connotations and denotations is not the best way of expressing thoughts.
I ****ing second that.Best laugh I've had all day![]()
Actually, sometimes it is. Any form of language can be appropriate given the situation you're in. Who is anyone here to tell others how to express themselves?
I would argue that those who can't trust themselves to swear in the right circumstances are emotionally constipated.
We're not telling you that you should start using words with a minimum of nine letters; we're saying that using words with offensive and/or vulgar connotations and denotations is not the best way of expressing thoughts.
So are you suggesting that: a) all words are equal; and b) their connotations and denotations are useless? I'm sorry, but wake up. Words have different denotations and connotations, and some words are either too offensive or too vulgar. That's not my opinion; that's the world's general opinion. Each word has a different meaning.
Well, the way you initially stated your point led me to believe that you think all words are equal, and since then, I assume that is what you're saying to us.
Both of those sound bad.![]()
Right there you contradict yourself.
Agreed. I find my parents don't listen to me unless I use words that upset them to some degree.Actually, sometimes it is. Any form of language can be appropriate given the situation you're in.
And I'm telling you that profanity is a superstition that changes over time, and that your divine word doesn't change the fact that sometimes profanity is the way to get your point across.
No, I'm saying these things that make these words "higher" or "lower" is a completely arbitrary guideline. Given, language itself is arbitrary when you dig deep enough, but, less than 100 years ago, you couldn't say breast, now you can. Language changes, profanity changes, and the only reason it exists is because it has shock value. You tell a person not to scream something in a protest, they do it because it gets a point across. I don't care how much you tell me the sentences "You're an idiot," and "You're a ****ing idiot" have the same meaning, it's not true. And don't tell me I should say "You're an enormous idiot" or even "You're a ****." None of those sentences say the same thing, and if those sentences were what I wanted to say, I'd say them in the first place.
And all politicians sound bad, but yet people choose the lesser of two evils every day (I don't, but others do). It goes back to my initial point that we're not in kindergarten. And not everybody is in bioethics class. I don't remember if it was you or someone else who said that an intelligent person knows to hold back their language, or something to that nature, but I disagree 100%. An intelligent person knows language, and knows when and where to use that language. I don't use the term contradisestablishmentarianistically in conversations with my friends, and I don't use **** in my world history class. I understand that profanity isn't generally accepted by society (even though I'd be willing to bet my macbook that a very large majority of the population uses it), but that doesn't change the validity of my points. Your points about connotation and denotation doesn't do anything but support my claims. Denotation point: Crap, poop, and **** all mean the same thing, yet only one is considered vulgar. Connotation point: Saying "That's ****ing ridiculous" sends a different, generally stronger point to the person hearing it than "that's ridiculous", whether good or bad. Whether or not the connotation is positive or negative on the receiving end has absolutely nothing to do with the word's place in the language.
hmmm ziggy... i think you caught on.![]()
![]()
what bothers me:
these words only have power that individual and society allow to the applied to them. (their connotations and negative value) i think that we put such restrictions on language is ridiculous.
hmmm ziggy... i think you caught on.![]()
![]()
totally agree.what bothers me:
these words only have power that individual and society allow to be applied to them. (their connotations and negative value) i think that we put such restrictions on language is ridiculous.
what bothers me:
these words only have power that individual and society allow to be applied to them. (their connotations and negative value) i think that we put such restrictions on language is ridiculous.