And if you notice.. it was still green.. all day i was texting surfing, eveythign was on accpt bluetooth.. I love this phone
And if you notice.. it was still green.. all day i was texting surfing, eveythign was on accpt bluetooth.. I love this phone
I agree. I get great battery life. With normal usage I get almost two days with a single charge.
And if you notice.. it was still green.. all day i was texting surfing, eveythign was on accpt bluetooth.. I love this phone
8 hours of standby time? That's horrible. I was up to 5 days 7 hours once, and I'm not impressed by this puny PoS battery. The advertised standby time is 250 hours. That's over 10 days, I only managed to get half of that. My gf has some tiny Samsung phone she bought in 2005, it's about half the size of the iPhone, and 3 years down the line it can still go 6-7 days between charges.
Yeah, and that's what I tried. I have a secondary phone to take calls and I have an iPod Touch for the fun stuff you might use an iPhone for. I'd love to see if anyone, anywhere outside of Apple's tech lab has actually made it past the 10-day mark.yeah but thats because of the usage. by 250 hours standby that means if the phone is on and you don't use it in anyway, it won't die for about 250 hours.
8 hours of standby time? That's horrible. I was up to 5 days 7 hours once, and I'm not impressed by this puny PoS battery. The advertised standby time is 250 hours. That's over 10 days, I only managed to get half of that. My gf has some tiny Samsung phone she bought in 2005, it's about half the size of the iPhone, and 3 years down the line it can still go 6-7 days between charges.
That Samsung probably doesn't do half the things that an iPhone does, though. That's an apples/oranges comparison. It is better to compare phones that have similar configs and capabilities.
Exactly, and because of that huge potential and its many capabilities, the iPhone should have had the battery to match it. Instead they gave us an orange with the battery capacity of an apple. They can't sell it as this wonderful omnipotent device that's not only an advanced phone but also a gaming platform, an entertainment center for music, TV shows and movies, an internet communicator, and then go "Oh... P.S. You can't actually do any of those things when you're more than 3 feet away from the nearest power outlet or USB port, because then the battery will die in no time and you won't be able to make calls".That Samsung probably doesn't do half the things that an iPhone does, though. That's an apples/oranges comparison. It is better to compare phones that have similar configs and capabilities.
Exactly, and because of that huge potential and its many capabilities, the iPhone should have had the battery to match it. They can't sell it as this wonderful omnipotent device that's not only an advanced phone but also a gaming platform, an entertainment center for music, TV shows and movies, an internet communicator, and then go "Oh... P.S. You can't actually do any of those things when you're more than 3 feet away from the nearest power outlet or USB port, because then the battery will die in no time and you won't be able to make calls".
The big selling point when the iPhone was introduced, was that it was three devices in one. Phone, iPod, Internet device. This is how Steve introduced it. Guess he forgot to mention that it still only has the battery capacity of one of those three devices.I don't think its being marketed to do a ton of things.
Right, but a reasonable case scenario is that you charge up your phone in the morning, make a couple of calls, get on a train for an hour and watch a TV show or play a game to kill time, go around town and have meetings with a few clients and surf a little or make a few calls between meetings, or perhaps listen to some music while you make your way around town. Then you get on the train home and place an hour-long phone call. Then you want to call home to check if any groceries are needed. Oops, battery's already dead.And, a user doesn't HAVE to use all options that are available. The phone charges quickly, so in those cases that you're needing a charge, just plug it up (I'm going to get another charger just for work).
Right, but a reasonable case scenario is that you charge up your phone in the morning, make a couple of calls, get on a train for an hour and watch a TV show or play a game to kill time, go around town and have meetings with a few clients and surf a little or make a few calls between meetings, or perhaps listen to some music while you make your way around town. Then you get on the train home and place an hour-long phone call. Then you want to call home to check if any groceries are needed. Oops, battery's already dead.
That isn't extreme usage, it's moderate usage. Extreme usage is when you bleed the battery to death in 2 hours by playing a complex 3D game non-stop. If you can't kill a couple of hours of travelling by using it as a video iPod or a gaming device without killing its capability to be used as a phone later, something is fundamentally wrong with the concept.
Not only do most smartphones (Nokia, SE, Blackberry etc) give you better battery life (SE P1i = 440 hrs standby, BB Bold = 310 hrs, N95 = 280 hours, etc) standby, but they all have a frickin' battery door so that you can bring an extra battery and switch them when the first one dies. The iPhone has a dainty wristwatch battery *and* it's sealed.Can you list another device that has these capabilities in multitasking and will go without recharging 6 hours later?
I don't hate the device, in that case it would be easy. I just hate the disgusting subhuman bucket of puke who decided that this battery was appropriate for the iPhone.If you hate the device that much, just sell it and get something that you can stomach.