Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Smiller4128

macrumors member
Original poster
Feb 1, 2010
96
0
Im not sure of course but I vaguely remember Steve Jobs saying something along the lines that HDMI was pretty much like a Blu-Ray Drive in the fact that he was never going to incorporate it into any Apple Design. Im surprised they included an HDMI port into the RMBP design. Not that I'm unhappy by any means, I'm actually quite excited about it...just unexpected
 
I'm surprised that they put HDMI because I thought they were going to try and shove thunderbolt down our throats. Same for USB 3.
 
I'm surprised that they put HDMI because I thought they were going to try and shove thunderbolt down our throats. Same for USB 3.

I think they sensibly did this to allow a display to be still connected whilst using ethernet/firewire dongles on thunderbolt, no other display connector would fit, without confusing the issue.

usb 3 is no surprise though, as they effectively get it for free with latest chipset.
 
Probably decided to implement it after he died...yeah i know it sounds harsh. But he was pretty against HDMI.

consumer demand - main reason they included it, because currently 1% of Macbook users are even using those thunderbolt ports! HDMI was long overdue.
 
I think they sensibly did this to allow a display to be still connected whilst using ethernet/firewire dongles on thunderbolt, no other display connector would fit, without confusing the issue.

usb 3 is no surprise though, as they effectively get it for free with latest chipset.

I'm no expert, but based on some of the comments I've read regarding GT 650M, 1GB video ram could have been easily achievable but Apple purposely stuck with 512MB, probably asked nvidia to specifically make it that way.

So I'm just saying it's probably not past apple to specifically ask intel to provide USB 2 versions.
 
I'm no expert, but based on some of the comments I've read regarding GT 650M, 1GB video ram could have been easily achievable but Apple purposely stuck with 512MB, probably asked nvidia to specifically make it that way.

So I'm just saying it's probably not past apple to specifically ask intel to provide USB 2 versions.

Apple chooses how many and what kind of video ram chips get soldered onto the logic board. They aren't built into the GPU chip. Extra video ram actually costs them (slightly) more money. The USB 3 support however is built right into the Ivy Bridge controller chips and doesn't cost Apple anything extra.
 
I was surprised by the addition of an HDMI port on the new MacBook Pro too. With high-speed ports like Thunderbolt, you would think that they would just sell a Thunderbolt to HDMI adapter, and perhaps include an extra Thunderbolt port on the computer. However, I remember reading something a while ago saying that part of the HDMI spec disallows adapters, and everything should be HDMI to HDMI only. Any adapters that you see out there being made are not conforming to the specification and are not "official".

I think the best reason I've heard so far for the addition of the HDMI port is from earlier in this thread:

JorisTheWise: I think the HDMI port is a subtle hint for a future television created by Apple.

It would allow for easy connections to an AppleTV when wireless isn't available.
 
Im not sure of course but I vaguely remember Steve Jobs saying something along the lines that HDMI was pretty much like a Blu-Ray Drive in the fact that he was never going to incorporate it into any Apple Design. Im surprised they included an HDMI port into the RMBP design. Not that I'm unhappy by any means, I'm actually quite excited about it...just unexpected
How do you explain the HDMI ports in earlier Macs?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.