iMac 27 inch and gaming

Discussion in 'iMac' started by palebluedot, Apr 13, 2010.

  1. palebluedot macrumors 6502a

    palebluedot

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    #1
    I was waiting to buy a new Macbook Pro but as soon as they were released today I said "meh" and decided maybe I should buy a brand new iMac and keep my Early 08 MBP. I want to get a new Mac in preparation for the upcoming launch of Steam on OS X and just because mine is long in the tooth for Windows gaming.

    Anyways... I just had a thought and was wondering if any owners could clear it up. The resolution on the 27 i7 Quad Core seems ENORMOUS for a middle-grade ATI GPU. Are you able to game on high settings for semi-modern games like L4D2, TF2, etc. at the 27"'s native resolution? What are your thoughts on it as a gaming machine. It seems like the 27" will obsolete itself quicker than a i5/i7 21 inch (if one ever comes out) due to the screen resolution size.
     
  2. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #2
    The extra resolution doesn't effect games as much as people say. From my experiences with games like SC2 beta, dirt2 and modern warfare, going from the native 2560x1440 resolution to 1920x1080 resolution only nets you around 8-10 fps on average.
    The real kicker is anti-aliasing, because enough of it will usually max out the amount of available bandwidth the gpu has.

    Speaking of bandwidth-- the mobility 4850 in the iMac is no where near a "middle-grade gpu." I mean sure you could say it is middle-grade to the desktop counterparts, but we're making an argument here that there will never be a desktop grade discrete gpu in a form-factor such as the iMac. The mobility 4850 is designated as a "high-end notebook" mobile gpu and is one of the few mobile gpus that sports a 256 bit bus. Even most of the newer ati mobility 5k series are lesser performing than mobility 4850, with smaller buses. Only mobility 4870 and 5870 are superior as far as mobile ati cards.


    As far as actual performance? I get:

    30 fps out of dirt2 with max resolution and graphics settings; 4xaa
    50 fps out of starcraft2 beta with max resolution and max graphics settings, save shaders to high (current shaders in sc2 seem to be bugged out-- at least for ati cards)
    60 fps out of modern warfare1 with max resolution and max graphics settings; 4xaa
     
  3. natewsmith macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA
    #3
    I asked the people there at Apple and they said it was a REAL desktop version of the ATI card.
     
  4. Lifequest macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    #4
    Yes I was under the impression that the iMacs sport the ATI 4850 desktop, not "mobility". Can someone confirm?

    Regardless, the 4850 Mobility (1069 RANK 40) and 4850 (1334 RANK 22).
    We're getting - if i'm correct - a rank 22 Video Card.
    Yeah...rip off. But I'm happy. Not an intense gamer.

    Friend just built a custom PC for $2k, it rips my $3k (australia) iMac in any benchmarks.

    Oh sorry, GPU benchmarks here, ALSO, many new GPUs not added to the list, so the 4850 is actually lower ranked...
    http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_list.php
     
  5. BulletToothTony macrumors 6502

    BulletToothTony

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    #5
    just so u know after messing around with cod4 i wasn't able to run the Native Resolution on my 27" C2D 3.06 imac but when i lowered the resolution to 1920x1080 i was able to MAX all settings.

    the i5 n i7 have a better video card i believe.. but at least now u know a trick. and to be perfectly honest i could NOT tell the difference between native and 1080p

    either way cod4 ran smooth and i'm sure l4d or scs will do as well
     
  6. Badger^2 macrumors 68000

    Badger^2

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Location:
    Sacramento
  7. Rodus macrumors 6502a

    Rodus

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Location:
    Midlands, UK
    #7
    The 4850 in the iMac is definitely a mobility model, if you use ATI's drivers catalyst drivers then it even identifies as such, running with a core speed of 500 Mhz and VRAM speed of 850 Mhz, however you can happily overclock it to desktop GPU speeds and beyond. I'm running at 670 Mhz/970 Mhz and with SMC fan control it doesn't get over 65 c.

    yup, 4850 in the ix models, 4670 in the Core 2.
     
  8. alanwong macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Location:
    Sydney
    #8
    Have actually heard the suggest that one build a ~$1k PC and hook it up to the iMac (as a screen) if you really wanted to game... :p
     
  9. Kinoko macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    #9
    what about the CPU?

    I'm also thinking about buying an 27" iMac, my first mac ever. I want the better GPU, because I plan on doing some occasional gaming that requires it, but I'm still torn between the i5 and i7. I fail to find any conclusive answers to if the i7 would provide me with something more than the i5, especially in terms of gaming, would I even notice the difference?

    The difference between i7 and i5 for me is 170€ (230$, 150£). I don't need newish games to blow me away, I just want them to work smoothly after paying 2000€ for a computer :p. (..the 170€ would buy me a nice wii that I've been planing to buy for ages..)

    tl;dr: i5 or i7, gaming. does it make a difference?
     
  10. NATO macrumors 68000

    NATO

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    #10
    I don't think it makes much difference between the i5 and i7 apart from the raw MHz difference between the two (and even then it's a small difference). Games aren't very multi-threaded so you'd be hard pushed to find a game that would use 4 cores, never mind the 8 (4 + 4virtual) cores in the i7.
     
  11. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #11
    There was an article I read somewhere that compared gaming performance of i5 to i7 in a multitude of modern titles.

    Almost all of the games had same FPS, except for a couple here and there that got 2-3 more fps from i7.

    You'd sooner get more FPS out of 1333mhz ram than an upgrade to i7 I'm afraid.
     
  12. palebluedot thread starter macrumors 6502a

    palebluedot

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    #12
    It is a shame that the 21" does not have an i5 :( that would be great.

    Thanks for the responses so far folks! As to the questions why an iMac... Well I am part of that small subset of hardcore games who are also hard core Mac OS X users and it's more cumbersome to have 3 computers on my desk. I'd rather consolidate to a Mac laptop and Mac desktop.

    My main fear, as I said, is that the 27" res is huge for such a middle grade card (according to what you could get on a desktop rig with a 27" monitor and spec the settings).

    :p
     
  13. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #13
    The mobility 4850 has the bandwidth of most modern day desktop gpus, it's only lacking in raw core speed-- which can be overclocked at any time if necessary.

    Your performance will definitely not suffer!
     
  14. Rodus macrumors 6502a

    Rodus

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Location:
    Midlands, UK
    #14
    I'm in exactly the same boat as you, the 27" i5 is a great gaming machine. The Stalker Games, Metro 2033, Crysis et al all run very nicely.
     
  15. ChronoIMG macrumors regular

    ChronoIMG

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    #15
    Can you tell me about the noise levels when running a GPU intensive game? I'm interested in buying the 27" iMac instead of the new MBP's refresh but I'm concerned about noise. My current MBP (Late 2007) sounds like a helicopter when playing anything that uses the GPU at all. It's so loud in fact that I've tried moving it under my desk but it's still annoyingly loud.

    Thanks.
     
  16. Rodus macrumors 6502a

    Rodus

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Location:
    Midlands, UK
    #16
    OS X side is very quiet, CoD 4 maxed out and running for ages hardly gets the fan up at all (although that may change if we have a hot summer). Under Windows I have SMC fan control running all the time 'cos the GPU is overclocked and it is a little noisy, so I turn up my surround sound :) problem solved. I'd rather have a little fan noise and a cool graphics card then a toaster. The sound is nothing like the new Fermi cards however.

    If you are a gamer then the Radeon 4850 blows the Nvidia 330m out the water, no comparison.
     
  17. ChronoIMG macrumors regular

    ChronoIMG

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    #17
    Yeah and that just makes me sad :(

    My MBP gets both fans up to 6000rpm when running any game making it just really loud and annoying. Sure I can turn on music and what not to drown it out but sometimes I'd prefer not too.

    It's looking more and more like I'm getting an iMac and keeping my MBP as a spare machine for travelling, etc.
     
  18. Fraaaa macrumors 65816

    Fraaaa

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    London, UK
    #18
    I wanted to buy a new MBA but probably I'll buy an high-end iMac and stick with my ol' MacBook.

    I ought to play Diablo III!
     
  19. alanwong macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Location:
    Sydney
    #19
    Installed Oblivion under XP on my 27" i5 iMac yesterday.

    At full resolution it looks beautiful but thought that it chugged a bit compared to my old AMD with a 8800GT running at 1680 x 1050...
     
  20. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #20
    You should be able to get 60fps out of oblivion easily. Install fraps and find out your fps!
     
  21. alanwong macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Location:
    Sydney
    #21
    But won't the FPS be dependent on what you're doing (and hence looking at) in the game at that time? I.e. if in a room the FPS would be higher than outdoors?

    What I'd need (to be scientific about it) is a script I could run for Oblivion... ;)
     
  22. Rodus macrumors 6502a

    Rodus

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Location:
    Midlands, UK
    #22
    Get the latest catalyst drivers and install them with mobility modder, the drivers Apple include are rubbish.
     
  23. MCFinn macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    #23
    I'm in the same boat with you. I wanted to get the 27" iMac ages ago, but had to fight the urge because of the reported problems and "disappointing" choice of GPU.

    Then I waited for this latest batch of MBPs that was supposed to be replacing my aging MBP (SR, 2.4C2D, 15", 8600GT), but once again, I'm not too happy with their choice of a GPU. *sigh*

    I hope Apple upgrades their 27" iMacs with HD5850 goodness soon!
     
  24. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #24
    I think only mobility 4870 and 5870 will be better than 4850 I'm afraid :(
     
  25. Rodus macrumors 6502a

    Rodus

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Location:
    Midlands, UK
    #25
    ^^Yes, at the moment the current 5850m is weaker then the 4850m, the only benefit is it supports DX11
     

Share This Page