Owning an iMac comes to about $500 per year for me. I use it for work, and I consider that a great per year price. But I think it would cost about the same if I upgraded every 2 or 3 years, instead of 5+. Essentially it's switching to a "leasing" mindset (in practical terms, NOT in bank definition).
Breaking down the figures:
I have a 2013 27" iMac i7 780M. It was $2,560 (education price plus tax). I bought it Nov. 2013, so 5.5 years. That's $465 per year.
Apple will pay me $490 for it as a trade in. I know I could get more on eBay, but I prefer to get it done and finished with a trade in.
Subtract the trade in value and it brings the per year quite a bit lower to $376. But while the computer still runs great now for most tasks-- I've been needing updated specs for a couple of years now for video editing.
Let's say I bought a 2017 iMac when it was new and wanted to trade up to a 2019 now.
I believe the 2017 i7 with the 580, and SSD (I'm excluding RAM upgrade costs) was $2,500 from my research. (Correct me if you have a more accurate figure). In general, the non-taxed retail price and the education plus tax prices equal out, so we'll stick with $2,500.
Apple's trade in value for that model is $1,510 right now. That would have been two years of ownership, so $495 per year.
Obviously Macs hold their value well, so I would imagine trade in values will stay about in line with these two data points.
Thinking of it this way also helps me on the big decision of whether to get the 580X or the Vega. If I'm not stretching it to 5+ years, the Vega upgrade and its cost feels a lot less necessary.
To wrap this up, I think $500 per year is a great price for a machine like this. And if it's going to be about the same per year cost, I think it would be better to upgrade every 2 to 3 years and keep a machine that keeps up with my tasks, rather than waiting 5+ years, when it runs slowly for my most intensive computing tasks that I need to run. Or if it's only about $100 extra per year for the more frequent updates, that's still great value.
Thoughts? Is there any factor that I'm overlooking?
Breaking down the figures:
I have a 2013 27" iMac i7 780M. It was $2,560 (education price plus tax). I bought it Nov. 2013, so 5.5 years. That's $465 per year.
Apple will pay me $490 for it as a trade in. I know I could get more on eBay, but I prefer to get it done and finished with a trade in.
Subtract the trade in value and it brings the per year quite a bit lower to $376. But while the computer still runs great now for most tasks-- I've been needing updated specs for a couple of years now for video editing.
Let's say I bought a 2017 iMac when it was new and wanted to trade up to a 2019 now.
I believe the 2017 i7 with the 580, and SSD (I'm excluding RAM upgrade costs) was $2,500 from my research. (Correct me if you have a more accurate figure). In general, the non-taxed retail price and the education plus tax prices equal out, so we'll stick with $2,500.
Apple's trade in value for that model is $1,510 right now. That would have been two years of ownership, so $495 per year.
Obviously Macs hold their value well, so I would imagine trade in values will stay about in line with these two data points.
Thinking of it this way also helps me on the big decision of whether to get the 580X or the Vega. If I'm not stretching it to 5+ years, the Vega upgrade and its cost feels a lot less necessary.
To wrap this up, I think $500 per year is a great price for a machine like this. And if it's going to be about the same per year cost, I think it would be better to upgrade every 2 to 3 years and keep a machine that keeps up with my tasks, rather than waiting 5+ years, when it runs slowly for my most intensive computing tasks that I need to run. Or if it's only about $100 extra per year for the more frequent updates, that's still great value.
Thoughts? Is there any factor that I'm overlooking?
Last edited: