I made some gamut coverage comparisons today between the P3 iMac, Dell AdobeRGB and a high end Epson printer in order to gauge the real world impact of the expanded gamut on the iMacs. I used an Argyll CMS tool that creates a graphical comparison between two color profiles, calculates gamut volume and coverage.
For fine art printing, it’s a wash between the iMac P3 and a traditional wide gamut AdobeRGB monitor. The iMac’s color gamut covers 87.56% of the Epson, while the Dell covers 88.32%.
This is a negligible difference and each has its strong points. The iMac has better reproduction of greens, yellows and oranges, while the Dell shines on the cyan part of the spectrum. Both are good choices for photography work, and offer a real improvement over standard sRGB displays. For comparison, a standard sRGB display covers only about 67% of this particular printer gamut.
Compared to the DCI P3 video standard, the ** profiled ** iMac display covers 94,4% of it. Profiling a display to a known standard - 6500K and gamma 2.2 - reduces the useable gamut, more or less depending on the quality of the display and the calibration curves required. I assume it can reach the over 99% coverage stated by Apple if profiled with native gamma and white balance.
For fine art printing, it’s a wash between the iMac P3 and a traditional wide gamut AdobeRGB monitor. The iMac’s color gamut covers 87.56% of the Epson, while the Dell covers 88.32%.
This is a negligible difference and each has its strong points. The iMac has better reproduction of greens, yellows and oranges, while the Dell shines on the cyan part of the spectrum. Both are good choices for photography work, and offer a real improvement over standard sRGB displays. For comparison, a standard sRGB display covers only about 67% of this particular printer gamut.
Compared to the DCI P3 video standard, the ** profiled ** iMac display covers 94,4% of it. Profiling a display to a known standard - 6500K and gamma 2.2 - reduces the useable gamut, more or less depending on the quality of the display and the calibration curves required. I assume it can reach the over 99% coverage stated by Apple if profiled with native gamma and white balance.