I've been considering buying a dual 2.3 GHz G5 PowerMac for a few weeks now, but now I'm wondering whether it'd be worth it, now that the Intel iMac is out. Considering that the 2.0 GHz dual Intel is 2-3X faster than the old single 2.1 GHz G5 iMac, wouldn't that be (at least slightly) faster than the Dual 2.3 G5? Now, considering that after you add a 20" Cinema Display to the cost of the PowerMac, the 20" iMac is around half the price, why would anyone buy a PowerMac, unless we're talking Quad (outside my price range, unfortunately)? The only problem I can foresee is the fact that my software will have to be run in Rosetta, but the only really hardware intensive 3rd-party software I use with any regularity is Halo. I'm starting to worry that Halo came out right in that sweet spot where the game is too new to run in Rosetta, but too old for anyone to bother making a universal binary. Oh the dilemma. Anyway, at this point I'm leaning toward the iMac, but is there any reason I don't know about that would make me shoot for the PowerMac?