Try getting one that runs reliably if you use all cores and hyperthreading.
This is so misleading, LOL. Coming from someone who likes Apple where their computers have to DOWNTHROTTLE because the airflow is absolute garbage... that's rich.
Try getting one that runs reliably if you use all cores and hyperthreading.
I am hoping that you are wrong/not right about the Thunderbolt 3 controllers, given that the Xeon W has 48 PCI 3.0 lanes available and the C6xx chipset has 20 PCIe lanes. If I do simple math, here is the breakdown for a 4 Thunderbolt 3 controller iMac Pro -macOS is different, not just in GUI & kernel, but also in how Apple optimizes hardware usage. ie architecture
Typically Windows has a 20~35% performance penalty for same hardware due to its open upgradable nature. But not always. And no, I'm not digging up benchmarks. My statements are based on life/work/office/studio experience. As someone who is both a creative and a hardware/os/app fixer/dev who started w/ IRIX(unix) and DOS.
My main gripes w/ Apple are how far behind the curve they've been in terms of expandability and hardware choice. As in, no real Mac Pro update since 2010. But now that we have TB3, external enclosures are more of an option; however, I still want a box w/ built-in standard PCIe slots to enable full performance and acceleration.
Sure the iMac pro was four TB3 ports, but likely only two controllers. Thus one can only add two external devices that require full bandwidth, or less when adding additional monitors. Basically pick Two: eGPU, RAID, Red Rocket-X, Display 2, Display 3, External reference Video single chain output, Live stream video input
The Z6 is definitely more upgradeable, but much more expensive as well.
Try and spec out the equivalent of a base iMac Pro. First off, since this is dual socket, you can't get a 3.7GHz 8 core with 4.5 TurboBoost, the best you can do is 3.2GHz with 3.7 Turbo Boost. Next add 32GB of RAM, and 1TB M.2 SSD. Add any 8GB Video card (I'm not trying to make it perfectly like for like) and you are at about $8,100, without a monitor. And that doesn't include 10Gbit which is going to cost you another $500 (but you get 2 ports).
The difference in multi-core score is not minor. The base model iMac Pro = 37,000+ while the high-end iMac 5K = 19,000+.
And many fools will be parted with their money only to not have an updated model until a decade later
Those Apples are still working...Take apart a dell and tell me that any of them are made with quality parts.There was a time when people could bring their toasters and irons to the repair shop, and car enthusiasts could swap out carburetors, cams and transmissions. That era died as toaster, irons, cars and now computers have become expendable and recycled.
There's little reason now to swap ram, hard-drives and graphics cards. This industry has matured to the point where software and hardware mature at a complementary rate.
I've been around the block a few times. My first "customized" computer was in 1985 and I started coding in 1973.
[doublepost=1513123932][/doublepost]
Not true. Dell servers and business notebooks of the mid to late 90's were superb. The notebooks had excellent build quality that rivaled and even bettered IBM's stuff. Apple then was still struggling to get market share and had mediocre build quality.
Last couple things I'm gonna say on this.
1. To all the Americans making the case that this machine offers value for money; I'm in the UK. You're paying $4999 for the base model. In the UK we're paying £4999. That is, at today's rate; $6672.87. We are paying over $1600 more than you for the same thing.
2. The only reviews I wanna hear are from people who have been absolutely hammering the GPU and the CPU at the same time. Ie; people who use real-time and offline rendering workflows consecutively, like me. (Substance Painter then into VRay). This workflow is punishing in terms of testing the thermal resilience of a machine. Messing around with a bit of ****ing high res video and a couple of graphics overlays is really not all that much of a test. I want to see if this machine really is ventilated to the degree that it needs to be for anyone who is actually going to push the hardware in it to its limit.
Until then, this machine remains untested as far as I'm concerned.
Like I keep saying - for UK customers the iMac pro is not $5000, it's $6671.
And no - this is not a case of everything being more expensive here; it's just Apple.
My circa 1998 Dell notebook is still working. It boots to NT4.1. It's obviously not used anymore but I keep it as a memory piece. Also have a Micron notebook, same vintage, still works. Both were well made. I have IBM PC with 5.25 floppies that could still boot if the boot disk is still good.Those Apples are still working...Take apart a dell and tell me that any of them are made with quality parts.
But to each his own..
But it seems you can't rely on Apple to fix things if they make them obsolete after 5 years (or is it 7?). If I hadn't been able to pull the guts out of my Cube so easily and fix it myself, I don't think I would have had any recourse sending it into Apple. It's 17 years old.
Yet here you are on a mac siteMy circa 1998 Dell notebook is still working. It boots to NT4.1. It's obviously not used anymore but I keep it as a memory piece. Also have a Micron notebook, same vintage, still works. Both were well made. I have IBM PC with 5.25 floppies that could still boot if the boot disk is still good.
Apple and quality? You can drop by my house any time and I can show you some dead Apple computers and iPhones that are beyond repair.Those Apples are still working...Take apart a dell and tell me that any of them are made with quality parts.
But to each his own..
My circa 1998 Dell notebook is still working. It boots to NT4.1. It's obviously not used anymore but I keep it as a memory piece. Also have a Micron notebook, same vintage, still works. Both were well made. I have IBM PC with 5.25 floppies that could still boot if the boot disk is still good.
Your the wrong audience. Individuals and companies who purchase the iMac Pro will undoubtedly make significantly more revenue than the cost of the hardware if gainfully employed. Apple produced the iMac Pro for many reasons, the average user not being one.
Q-6
And now that the pricing is out, the RAM upgrade prices are absolutely reasonable. For the 64GB upgrade they charge you $600, the same amount of RAM in store costs $800 or more.
Nothing says pro workstation like 32Gb of extra Ram for a mere 600 dolleros !