Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Analog Kid

macrumors G3
Original poster
Mar 4, 2003
9,425
12,692
I've lost my ability to keep track of Intel's product line, but I know a number of people here seem to keep it straight. The current Xeons in the iMac Pro line were from late 2017, if I have it right. Anyone know when the next generation might be ready?

If I'm reading Wikipedia right, the current chips pull something on the order of 120 to 140W. The next Mac Pro looks like it's based on chips pulling over 200W.

Are those also the chips that would make their way into the iMac Pro, or will there be lower power variants?
 
I've lost my ability to keep track of Intel's product line, but I know a number of people here seem to keep it straight. The current Xeons in the iMac Pro line were from late 2017, if I have it right. Anyone know when the next generation might be ready?

If I'm reading Wikipedia right, the current chips pull something on the order of 120 to 140W. The next Mac Pro looks like it's based on chips pulling over 200W.

Are those also the chips that would make their way into the iMac Pro, or will there be lower power variants?

There is no way a AIO will have 200W chips even the IMac Pro has the superior cooling system
 
I think they wouldn’t update it this year, even if they could.

The Mac Pro is coming out, they don’t want to come across it.
 
From what I understand the iMac Pro was a stop gap measure for Professionals that couldn't wait until the new Mac Pro was on the market. I bought an iMac Pro (2017) with an upgraded Video Card that I love using, but if I were going to buy an iMac today that would be a spec out iMac not an iMac Pro. The Mac Pro I couldn't afford as I would want a little more than just the base model and I think $1,000 for a stand is ridiculous. Besides I'm more into Photography and that hobby can be a little expensive. I'm not saying Apple won't ever upgrade the iMac Pro, but if Apple does it will be when the new Mac Pro has been out for awhile. That is my guess.
 
Not likely. I don't see anything on the leaked roadmap for this year or next for the LGA 2066 socket (used in iMac Pro) that will push beyond 18C nor anything other than 14nm. If Apple bothers updating. It would be some minor Cascade Lake improvement, perhaps the Apache Pass revision.

If you look at a premium model (Xeon Platinum). The top Skylake-SP to the top Cascade Lake-SP barely budged. They had to switch to an even more massive socket (BGA 5903) to get more cores with Cascade Lake-AP. Also move from a 205W TDP to a 400W TDP.

Sure they could move to the bigger socket used in the Mac Pro for more cores. Then they'd likely have to get some custom chips from Intel to fit within the iMac Pro's cooling capacity. Plus redesign the internals for the larger socket. I don't see it happening.

The current roadmap shows no 10nm for the Xeons in 2019 or 2020. I wouldn't expect much in the iMac Pro until 2021. Perhaps a minor CPU bump. Hopefully the GPU will be updated to AMD Navi 7nm.

Other rumors point to Ice Lake-SP using 10nm in 2020. Whether they'll also make smaller variants or wait for 2021 for the lower end Xeons is unknown.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
The Mac Pro is coming in at a lower price point than many of us expected—certainly a lot less than similar Windows boxes that the film industry is currently using. If you read the TechCrunch article (the only one where Apple went on the record), then you know that was the target customer.

This will affect the future of the iMP but no one knows how. I don't see it happening this year.

My guess s that there will an iMac you can buy for your parents and kids, another that will have the advanced cooling and other features of the iMP combined with the upper end current iMac but probably not the full extension of the iMP leaving the Mac Pro.
[doublepost=1560792227][/doublepost]
The Mac Pro I couldn't afford as I would want a little more than just the base model and I think $1,000 for a stand is ridiculous.
Then you aren't the targeted customer, are you?

Apple has said such a monitor will be available, not that it's required and the display models do have TB3 over USB-C (so you can hook up anything you want). You won't need to use it unless your work requires this and then it will be a bargain. Otherwise, a $300 4K or a $1,300 5K will certainly work quite well.

Since Apple is using off the shelf components and storage that they already sell, I was able to ballpark that the price of a 16 core Vega Pro Duo 128GB RAM (from OWC—they already have it) 2TB Mac Pro with a 27" LG Ultrafine (same screen as the iMP) should come in around $9,400.

That's a faster CPU w/ 2 more cores and higher performance GPU for $499 less than the current 14 Core Vega 64x iMac Pro with the same RAM and storage. The only reason the price difference isn't greater is the RAM—if it was user upgradable in the iMP, the price savings would be $1,280.

You wanna tell me again how expensive the Mac Pro is?

To my point, I don't believe that the iMP will go away so much as there will be something in the middle between the iMac and Mac Pro. The current low end iMac will remain in some form or other.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko and rxs0
Then you aren't the targeted customer, are you?

Apple has said such a monitor will be available, not that it's required and the display models do have TB3 over USB-C (so you can hook up anything you want). You won't need to use it unless your work requires this and then it will be a bargain. Otherwise, a $300 4K or a $1,300 5K will certainly work quite well.

Since Apple is using off the shelf components and storage that they already sell, I was able to ballpark that the price of a 16 core Vega Pro Duo 128GB RAM (from OWC—they already have it) 2TB Mac Pro with a 27" LG Ultrafine (same screen as the iMP) should come in around $9,400.

That's a faster CPU w/ 2 more cores and higher performance GPU for $499 less than the current 14 Core Vega 64x iMac Pro with the same RAM and storage. The only reason the price difference isn't greater is the RAM—if it was user upgradable in the iMP, the price savings would be $1,280.

You wanna tell me again how expensive the Mac Pro is?

To my point, I don't believe that the iMP will go away so much as there will be something in the middle between the iMac and Mac Pro. The current low end iMac will remain in some form or other.

If your estimate of $9,400.00 holds up for a 16c/128GB/2TB/Vega 2 Duo and a 5K display, that's not bad at all considering what you're investing in and what you will be getting back out.

I will state it again and again...I do not have work that requires that sort of firepower, but if I did, I really would not have any reservations about pulling the trigger on a Mac Pro from a hardware perspective. My reservations are about Intel's commitment to Xeon W, LGA 3467, the eventual move to PCIe 4.0/5.0, and Apple's commitment to the Pro community after six (6) years of ZERO upgrades to the Mac Pro 6,1.
 
The Mac Pro is coming at a way higher price point than MOST of us expected
Only those who didn't pay attention or refused to believe those of us who were are the only ones who should have been surprised.

The 2018 TechCrunch article made it quite clear who the customer base was. The competition are Win10 boxes selling between $8,000 (8 Core, 32GB 1TB) to $150,000 (56 Core 1TB RAM 8TB) for the last two years to that industry, not anything Apple is making now nor has made in the past... or Dell, HP or any of the mass market PC makers.

$treet on the 28 Core Platinum is over $11,000 and you need a pair for 56 Cores in a $150K Maya Box. Apple is probably using the $3,100 3175W 28 Core — similar to the Platinum but you can't gang two together. That's why I'm surprised the price is so low.

Anyone complaining about those prices in September is certainly not the intended customer.
My reservations are about Intel's commitment to Xeon W, LGA 3467, the eventual move to PCIe 4.0/5.0, and Apple's commitment to the Pro community
But that's just crystal ball nonsense. You apparently have little idea who the real "Pro community" is regarding this product. That's not a put-down, just an observation since you have no need for the competing products—if you had the need, you'd know. These customers are running very expensive, bleeding edge Windows boxes. So, beyond idle speculation, how valid are those concerns? How likely are you to need that kind of horsepower?

Time will tell if Apple's commitment is real concerning the Mac Pro. It does appear that Apple has the architecture in place for a real run at it. The non-expandable 6.1 was a mistake by their own admission in the 2017 TechCrunch article.

For most of us who need it, the iMac Pro is a good deal. I'm glad I bought now because I make my living on a Mac and needed it now. Crippling my work flow for another year would have been intolerable.
 
Only those who didn't pay attention or refused to believe those of us who were are the only ones who should have been surprised.

The 2018 TechCrunch article made it quite clear who the customer base was. The competition are Win10 boxes selling between $8,000 (8 Core, 32GB 1TB) to $150,000 (56 Core 1TB RAM 8TB) for the last two years to that industry, not anything Apple is making now nor has made in the past... or Dell, HP or any of the mass market PC makers.

$treet on the 28 Core Platinum is over $11,000 and you need a pair for 56 Cores in a $150K Maya Box. Apple is probably using the $3,100 3175W 28 Core — similar to the Platinum but you can't gang two together. That's why I'm surprised the price is so low.

Anyone complaining about those prices in September is certainly not the intended customer.

But that's just crystal ball nonsense. You apparently have little idea who the real "Pro community" is regarding this product. That's not a put-down, just an observation since you have no need for the competing products—if you had the need, you'd know. These customers are running very expensive, bleeding edge Windows boxes. So, beyond idle speculation, how valid are those concerns? How likely are you to need that kind of horsepower?

Time will tell if Apple's commitment is real concerning the Mac Pro. It does appear that Apple has the architecture in place for a real run at it. The non-expandable 6.1 was a mistake by their own admission in the 2017 TechCrunch article.

For most of us who need it, the iMac Pro is a good deal. I'm glad I bought now because I make my living on a Mac and needed it now. Crippling my work flow for another year would have been intolerable.

The 28-core they are using is the Intel Xeon W-3275M which retails for $7453, as the 3175X only turbos to 3.8GHz not up to 4.4Ghz, has a 255W TDP versus 205w TDP, is Skylake not Cascade Lake-based and only supports a max of 512GB of DRAM and not up to 1.5TB of DRAM.

You’re right, I don’t know, and although I guess I might be nursing a bit of a bruised ego (/s), you’re right, I cannot conceive of whether those purchasing a single $150K Maya box really care about an upgrade path as that is a capital expenditure that lasts X amount of years, probably in a single configuration and then gets sent back to the leasing company for resale or leasing back to a smaller firm, or is that not a realistic scenario? The last time I dealt with a $100K workstation was a Linotype-Hell DaVinci back in 1995. It was a beast, but I didn’t order, didn’t configure its hardware and because we weren’t a Unix shop (****ing Netware 3.11), integrating it into the rest of the network was a challenge as it was on loan to us more for client demos and sales pitches. It did real work, but I had little to do with it as screwing it up meant death by firing squad.

I have no idea whether my concerns are valid, probably not. Intel changes LGAs whenever they want and upgrade paths with Apple products are you buy a new one. I would think anyone buying a 2019 Mac Pro for those tasks it is best geared towards is going to know if they need 16, 24 or 28 core CPUs and is going to configure accordingly. My workflow would probably benefit from more than 4-cores, but I cannot tell you that definitely until I look What’s happening while I am doing my work. For me, the choice between a Core i9 iMac and a base iMac Pro is more of predicting my future needs than an immediate one, although the day is coming.
 
If your estimate of $9,400.00 holds up for a 16c/128GB/2TB/Vega 2 Duo and a 5K display, that's not bad at all considering what you're investing in and what you will be getting back out.
I used Apple BTO, store and OWC RAM pricing since everything exists already — except for the Pro Vega II (got the nomenclature wrong in the last post) which I estimated at a $2,000 upgrade from the 580x since pricing has not yet been announced.

I haven't a clue what the Pro Vega II Duo is going to run.
 
Not likely. I don't see anything on the leaked roadmap for this year or next for the LGA 2066 socket (used in iMac Pro) that will push beyond 18C nor anything other than 14nm. If Apple bothers updating. It would be some minor Cascade Lake improvement, perhaps the Apache Pass revision.

If you look at a premium model (Xeon Platinum). The top Skylake-SP to the top Cascade Lake-SP barely budged. They had to switch to an even more massive socket (BGA 5903) to get more cores with Cascade Lake-AP. Also move from a 205W TDP to a 400W TDP.

Sure they could move to the bigger socket used in the Mac Pro for more cores. Then they'd likely have to get some custom chips from Intel to fit within the iMac Pro's cooling capacity. Plus redesign the internals for the larger socket. I don't see it happening.

The current roadmap shows no 10nm for the Xeons in 2019 or 2020. I wouldn't expect much in the iMac Pro until 2021. Perhaps a minor CPU bump. Hopefully the GPU will be updated to AMD Navi 7nm.

Other rumors point to Ice Lake-SP using 10nm in 2020. Whether they'll also make smaller variants or wait for 2021 for the lower end Xeons is unknown.
Thanks. This is pretty much what I was looking for. The second link was more readable than the first, and your commentary helped. It sounds like my general hunch wasn't far off-- there's nothing new coming in the current TDP range, which means there'd need to be a more significant redesign than we would expect to see.


MacRumors could do with a set of Roundup articles on Intel and GPU roadmaps. It seems the Mac update cycle is tied more to Intel than anything else but what used to be an engineering field now seems closer to biology and requires understanding the distinguishing characteristics of the phylum, order, genus and species of the various processors. A roundup article basically laying out which processors feed into which product lines and what the past, current and future portfolio is would make things much clearer.
 
I've lost my ability to keep track of Intel's product line, but I know a number of people here seem to keep it straight. The current Xeons in the iMac Pro line were from late 2017, if I have it right. Anyone know when the next generation might be ready?

If I'm reading Wikipedia right, the current chips pull something on the order of 120 to 140W. The next Mac Pro looks like it's based on chips pulling over 200W.

Actually the 3175X goes all the way up the 255W but it came out substantially after the iMac Pro. ( And it is largely a giant stop gap kludge that Intel came up with. )

Short answer is that the iMac Pro is probably stuck for 2019. Intel may have something in mid 2020 , but iMac Pro may need to move a bit ( grow bigger to cool more or get off the "Look it is magical, no apparent vents' mindset).

The new Xeon W class processors that the Mac Pro is going to use are in the W-32xx class. The iMac Pro used the W-21xx. The second digit is generation in Intel's naming scheme. Intel's Server (SP) and Workstation (W) naming scheme is here:

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers-data-center.html

The Xeon W 3000 series is a different CPU socket ( LGA-3647 vs LGA-2066 and a different chipset C600 ver C422 ). There are some current reports that Intel is going to completely abandon the 2000 series for Xeon W. They don't have to if they re-rationalize the pricing. The current notion is that AMD Threadripper is such a huge threat they are completely walking away from the smaller socket into order to increase bandwidth by leverage the 3647 socket in a new way. I'm not sure they will retreat on all fronts there for 2019. Intel running for the hills in panic retreat would be odd.

There is also talk of "Cascade Lake X " HEDT series coming in the Fall. Perhaps that too is a mass abandoned of socket 2066. Up until now the high level of the X series has been just Xeon E5/W die designs with a set of features flipped on/off to separate them. Intel could move to better prices. Like the SP series with 3-8 sku levels (Bronze - Platinum ) they could have a bigger range of prices. The top levels of the X and W-22xx could move down a bit in price ( where have to at this point face more competitive with Ryzen 7 and 9 than with Threadripper. )

So one possibility is the somewhat stopgap W-22xx would come out late Fall and Intel probably wouldn't make big deal out of them ( but would be drop in replacements for the current W-21xx systems with more fixes and slighly better clocks. . ). That would give Apple an option for the iMac Pro.

The other is that Intel will pause from W-2xxx/socket and perhaps fill more of the HEDT with the mainstream desktop socket processor that maxes out at 10 cores. In that context Intel may wait until Ice lake (10nm0 arrives for W series to bring it up to two mostly complete tiers. So if Apple doesn't want to make substantive changes to the iMac Pro , it could be waiting until 2020-2021 for intel to uncork a suitable processor.


if Apple has to wait until 2020 to get something they could jump over to AMD ( which would be a longer delay).


I'm not sure how they'd fit the W-32xx into the current enclosure. It takes up substantially more space. (which standard 27" iMac case dimensions doesn't have much room for ) and runs substantially hotter. Conceptually, Apple could put a 'regular Retina' backlight system on that 6K panel and 'grow" the iMac Pro bigger. [ That would help separate more from the regular 27" iMac. ] . Or they could drop the constraint of hiding the output vents being the pedestal arm holding up the iMac Pro. Two bigger fans running output air to two larger vents would help at some thermal coverage.

An iMac Pro with an Ultra Wide (a different 6k3k 6240×2880 ) panel would grow volume too. Spaced farther apart would have some more room for a CPU 'zone' . If the iMac Pro proved itself as a product it may not have to rigidly stick to the 27" case's dimensions (or exit vent design metrics ) on the next iteration.

they could stop the iMac Pro at 16-18 cores. It really only needs something more than 8-10.( over the next 2-3 years). It doesn't have to chase "as many as possible".



Are those also the chips that would make their way into the iMac Pro, or will there be lower power variants?

A most up to date list is here:

https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/125035/intel-xeon-w-processor.html

The new W-32xx clocked slower to substantially drop the power levels (and prices ) probably won't help Intel much at all. clocked too slow the Ryzen 7 , 9 and this coming Falls Threadripper will walk right past them.
clock too low and Intel throws away single threaded and IPC advantage they have.
[doublepost=1560827413][/doublepost]
Not likely. I don't see anything on the leaked roadmap for this year or next for the LGA 2066 socket (used in iMac Pro) that will push beyond 18C nor anything other than 14nm. If Apple bothers updating. It would be some minor Cascade Lake improvement, perhaps the Apache Pass revision.

iMac Pro really doesn't need need much past 18c. It really only needs options higher than 8 and not dropping much on base clock. If on Intel there is not way over next 1.5-2 years to get to more than 18 on a single die. Nothing in the roadmaps point to Ice-Lake having any XCC ( > 18) die. 10nm may have trouble even getting to same size as current HCC ( > 10 and < 19 ) die. Intel may just get to 10c. and then use the 3647 package in the W-33xx series to package up two dies to goose the core count to 20c (but introduce more NUMA to the package ).

The iMac Pro is short on DIMM slots. Apache Pass features ( Optane DIMMs that are non-volatile memory )aren't really a viable option ( unless very dramatically change the case and screen size. And "no RAM door" Apache Pass is more than goofy ... even for Apple. It won't fly. ). Optane DIMMs primarily make sense where have enough slots for normal RAMM and add the Optane DIMMS in addition to that. They also require OS changes ( which Apple shows about zero signs of doing. and folks have spent years adding that support into Linux , Windows ,etc. That is not something Apple is going to throw in over night.)


As for roadmaps. it was there.
Intel-Client-CPU.jpg


https://www.extremetech.com/computi...ap-leak-still-shows-no-10nm-cpus-through-2020

x299 and C422 Cascade Lake.

The new W-3xxx is not a C422 option on that chart so the above is dated. Whether Intel put another 'swim lane' on the chart or wholesale dumped the socket compatible stuff altogether I haven't seen a broad picture roadmap to say it is out yet.
 
The answers in this thread are very informative!

I hope they move iMP to 32” and leave the current 27” iMP w/ improved cooling for 5K iMac (but I don’t see how Apple decides to abandon HDD, in fact when they do we’ll see T2/T3 included, I read somewhere that because of SATA there isn’t a T2 atm)
 
....

I hope they move iMP to 32” and leave the current 27” iMP w/ improved cooling for 5K iMac (but I don’t see how Apple decides to abandon HDD, in fact when they do we’ll see T2/T3 included, I read somewhere that because of SATA there isn’t a T2 atm)

There are two SATA connectors inside the upcoming Mac Pro and it has a T2 chip. There isn't something "inherent" about T2 that blocks all SATA drives. the iMac 2019 probably still has the old baseline design because that was the most cost effective way of getting an update out. ( tweak the firmware, bump the PCH , drop in new CPU into same socket and bump the GPUs slightly. ). It allows Apple to 'kick the can' down the road until can finish a deeper overall and SSDs get more affordable.

The T2 primarily makes sense when it is the primary default boot drive ( and the T2 has a SSD controller built in so that basically implies that drive is a SSD). The disconnect with the iMac at the moment is that this is one system were Apple isn't trying to severely crank up the entry level pricing. At least for the moment. In the context of shooting the Mac Pro entry price up about 100% , there are probably enough Mac desktop system pricing 'riots' they want to handle for 2019 already. They probably weren't looking for a even more 'drama'. [ tack on a hiccup on moving the iMac Pro and 27" iMac apart and even bigger desire to avoid the changes. ]


Apple could far more easily "abandon HDD" in iMac is they would stop using inflated SSD pricing to "print money for bigger product category margins". AFPS is primarily written for SSDs. Even more so in the new version of APFS coming with 10.15. Yet Apple also has completely market detached pricing on SSDs ( especially as move up in capacity). If Apple wants folks to get off of HDDs quickly their pricing is extremely counter productive. Right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing (or doesn't care while frolicing in the Scrooge McDuck money pit. )
 
Actually, the latest official roadmap that leaked is different and includes Cooper Lake as a Cascade Lake refresh, before any 10nm Xeon (which will arrive not earlier than Q3/Q4 2020).

Given that Apple introduces the Mac Pro in September, an iMP refresh in October/November won't steal any thunder and won't kill the sales, since they occupy two completely different market sectors (and pricing).

intel-xeon-roadmap-through-2020-800x450.png
Screenshot 2019-06-20 at 18.01.13.png
 
Craig Federighi: And now you look at today’s 5k iMac, top configs, it’s incredibly powerful, and a huge fraction of what would’ve traditionally required the Mac Pros of old and are being well addressed by iMac — whether its audio editing, video editing, graphics, arts and so forth. But there’s still even further we can take iMac as a high performance, pro system, and we think that form factor can address even more of the pro market.

Phil Schiller: With regards to the Mac Pro, we are in the process of what we call ‘completely rethinking the Mac Pro.’

It was clear since their press conference in 2017 that they are addressing two different markets, not a stop gap.
 
If your estimate of $9,400.00 holds up for a 16c/128GB/2TB/Vega 2 Duo and a 5K display, that's not bad at all considering what you're investing in and what you will be getting back out.

I will state it again and again...I do not have work that requires that sort of firepower, but if I did, I really would not have any reservations about pulling the trigger on a Mac Pro from a hardware perspective. My reservations are about Intel's commitment to Xeon W, LGA 3467, the eventual move to PCIe 4.0/5.0, and Apple's commitment to the Pro community after six (6) years of ZERO upgrades to the Mac Pro 6,1.

The old rule of thumb says: Buy the computer you need now if the current specs meets your demand. This is especially true if a new generation was/will be just released like the new Mac Pro or the 2019 iMac. This gives you enough "headroom" for some years to come and you don't have to worry about any improvements that will happen in the next years. There will always be something newer and better behind the next corner....
 
If your estimate of $9,400.00 holds up for a 16c/128GB/2TB/Vega 2 Duo and a 5K display, that's not bad at all considering what you're investing in and what you will be getting back out.
Sorry, but I think it's laughable to hope for a Mac Pro with those specs and Dell screen for $9,400. I really hope I'm wrong, but I think a machine like that will be closer to $12-13K from Apple.com. Btw, Apple lists the RAM options as 32GB, 48, 96, 192, 384, 768, and 1.5TB.

edit: link to tech specs
https://www.apple.com/mac-pro/specs/
 
Last edited:
Bumping with latest news of the new W-2200 Xeons.

Anyone hopeful for a refresh? There's been zero rumors but it could be one of those silent updates with no fanfare.
[automerge]1570475967[/automerge]
So one possibility is the somewhat stopgap W-22xx would come out late Fall and Intel probably wouldn't make big deal out of them ( but would be drop in replacements for the current W-21xx systems with more fixes and slighly better clocks. . ). That would give Apple an option for the iMac Pro.

Looking a bit more likely given the latest news. The new chips are cheaper too 🤔
 
I am also waiting for the new iMac Pro 2 with new processors and other interesting features, or buying the i9 iMac 2019 5K. But I am afraid that until Apple has milked very well its new Mac Pro during several months or years we are not going to see a new iMac Pro update, if this computer will have eventually a new refresh, something I seriously doubt.

They do not want the iMac Pro to possibly cannibalize Mac Pro sales. I know I am a little pessimistic, but Apple ultimately follows the money more than the customer needs. I want to be wrong with this assumption, of course.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.