Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The upgradeable machine is coming in 2018. The modular Mac Pro. Think of this machine as the plug-n-play workstation for the professional who cares more about what they have to do with the machine than what the machine will be down the road.

You might be reading into this. If you look at the conversation Phill Shiller had with the press where he talked about the Mac Pro that follows the iMac Pro, he talked about modularity like you mention, but that may mean the monitor is separate from the chassis, NOT that all the components are user upgradeable. He definitely NEVER mentioned the word 'upgradeable'. I wouldn't be surprised if the RAM, FLASH, and CPU were soldered to the motherboard and there were 3-4 slots where video and others cards could be added. This is what he might have meant by 'modular'. Time will tell. (I hope I'm wrong)
 
The whole design of this thing is a show-off of why the current Apple is against the traditional Mac Pro concept. The current Apple wants to be in control of your choices and moves. The traditional Mac Pro put you in control, and Apple cannot permit that anymore. The only hope for the promised “modular Mac Pro” is that this weird thing fails like the cylinder. And still... what will the current Apple mean by “modular”?

It means, you can upgrade it. Will it looks like a regular gray tower? Probably not. Snap-together modules? Maybe.
 
I made this mistake once and I won't make it again. I bought a Mac Pro 2013 and it was around $6K without monitors. There are really fast Thunderbolt 3 RAIDs out that are about 3X faster than my Thunderbolt 2 RAID, but I can't use them because my Mac Pro can't be upgraded to Thunderbolt 3. There are GPUs that are light years faster than my FirePro D700s, but I can't upgrade to them.

What's a joke is the fastest Mac for pro apps is a 2010 Mac Pro with a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti video card. http://barefeats.com/hic2_nv_vs_vega.html

So no, I won't be spending $5K and up on this iMac even though I'm ready to upgrade. I'm going to see if Apple delivers a modular Mac next year and evaluate that. If not, I'm going to be using Adobe Creative Suite on a Windows 10 PC, the first Windows PC I'll have in over ten years.
 
I would rather void the warranty and perform a iMac DIY teardown for repairs and upgrades than use Apple's costly and time consuming authorized dealer.

I imagine most would rather keep the warranty so if something goes wrong, they could get it fixed quickly, without argument, and get on with their work.

People here talk about "Pros" and upgrading but in my experience, the people who work with these daily drivers in professional work don't get a stiffy from upgrading their machine or even particularly care. They just want something that is already configured with the least effort possible, works reliably, and has great support if it does go wrong.

For the professionals who really do need a modular machine (and there are plenty of those too, don't get me wrong), Apple have already stated that will be coming. So either camp will be pleased. I honestly don't get the hate for the iMac Pro around here.
 
I don't get it; what's the reason behind this change? Surely they should make a Pro machine MORE upgradeable, not less.

I'm not sure i understand this line of thinking. A "pro" in the context of this article is someone that uses this machine for their work purposes. What makes these people any more likely to need/want to upgrade their machines than any other computer users. I think that the kind of people that have such intensive spec needs that would want to be upgrading ram would also be the same people that would want faster processors/etc.... and thus would just be getting a newer iMac. Don't most studies show that very few people actually upgrade RAM>?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tooloud10
Opening a small plastic cover to upgrade memory doesn't need much techniques, if it was there.

Then buy the regular 27" iMac or wait for the new modular Mac Pro. I just don't see the point of people hating on a machine that doesn't fit their needs and/or budget. And from what I've seen of the inside, that RAM door would have meant design changes. And I'm sure the thermal system and ventilation was priority over the needs of a small section of an already small section of the Mac user base.
 
That my friend is Tim Cook's definition of the PRO products, next year they'll come up with an iPhone Pro and stupid people keeps buying it! SMH!
 
I'm not sure i understand this line of thinking. A "pro" in the context of this article is someone that uses this machine for their work purposes. What makes these people any more likely to need/want to upgrade their machines than any other computer users. I think that the kind of people that have such intensive spec needs that would want to be upgrading ram would also be the same people that would want faster processors/etc.... and thus would just be getting a newer iMac. Don't most studies show that very few people actually upgrade RAM>?
Depends on what you need. At work, I use a Macbook pro that's 2 or 3 years old -- but we would jump for a macbook pro that has 32gb of RAM if Apple would just make it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeattleMoose
Apple makes their Mac products more and more anti-consumer every year. It's really sad. :(

And the same people that are up in arms about net neutrality seem to be the ones that love locked-down, non-upgradeable/repairable Apple hardware, permanent iOS updates, etc... o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lone Deranger
I opened up my previous generation (2012) iMac to replace a failed HDD. It wasn't hard at all. Probably took 10 minutes to get the display off and then 10 to clean the adhesive residue and replace the adhesive strips.

Only hard thing was making sure I had the adhesive on hand first. Other than that it was quite straightforward and not a hindrance in any way.
Why would you remove the display to replace the HDD...?
 
Meaning I can do it myself when I pick up a used one in 2024, sweet.
 
I'm not sure i understand this line of thinking. A "pro" in the context of this article is someone that uses this machine for their work purposes. What makes these people any more likely to need/want to upgrade their machines than any other computer users. I think that the kind of people that have such intensive spec needs that would want to be upgrading ram would also be the same people that would want faster processors/etc.... and thus would just be getting a newer iMac. Don't most studies show that very few people actually upgrade RAM>?

Lots and lots of pros upgrade their Windows PCs. You can upgrade everything, including the CPU.

I have a desktop computer, a Mac Pro, that I've had for about 3.5 years. My GPUs are out-of-date and slow compared to the latest. My pro software will be much, much faster if I simply swap out the GPUs I have with new ones. The cost of upgrading would be anywhere from $500-$1,000 depending on the new GPU that I get, versus $5K for a bare-bones iMac Pro that would be slower?

This is the #1 issue, IMHO, that makes a lot of pros go to Windows PCs. I know three who were on Macs and switched to Windows PC for DaVinci Resolve, Autodesk Maya, and Adobe's suite in the last two years.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.