Or maybe Nvidia hates us hehe
I think you mean AMD [AMD makes the R9 290/295x]
Or maybe Nvidia hates us hehe
I have a top spec 2013 iMac 27. While it's generally very quiet, Handbrake transcoding, Prime95 or any similar sustained multithreaded CPU-bound activity will cause the fan run at high speed. The noise is not unpleasant, but it is relatively loud. My overclocked Windows PC (which has 7 fans) is next to it, and the iMac at full blast is louder.
I doubt the retina iMac is much if any louder than the non-retina iMac when both are running Handbrake. For less stressful tasks, it is possible the retina iMac fan speed kicks up earlier than the non-retina iMac.
Point is one shouldn't be surprised a CPU/GPU that is capable of doing more work (or same work faster) will run hotter. If you could dial your CPU/GPU back to what a slower unit does it would run cooler.
I think sometimes people forget the actual reason higher end Mac's run hotter. They think of it as a design flaw not an inherent characteristic of applied physics.
...and, yes, it runs hot. Civilization V gets the GPU temp up to 95°C. The fan is barely audible at that temp. That's my most demanding app and it used to get the fans roaring on my 2006 Mac Pro with a Radeon 5770, at about 45°C. It's designed to run hot. I don't see any problem with this... yet. I really like the system for other reasons, so I'm hanging on to mine. If it burns up, then I'll be annoyed, but I assume it was tested and the GPU will throttle back if it gets to 105°C. Haven't managed that yet, though.
...
I am talking about what I consider ordinary stuff like watching a video stream (even if Flash does suck as mentioned) and playing a game on low graphics settings. This causes very high temps and very high fan speeds (in fact, the maximum possible). Is that reasonable?
I think the question is: Is yours normal, or not? (Is the fan mechanically OK ?)
You should compare yours directly with an identical iMac - side by side.
Give Apple an opportunity to checkout/repair, etc - or if you are still within the 14 day from new, return to Apple.
...
I will be calling Apple on Monday to return it. I am very unhappy with it.
Now comes the question of what to replace it with. Some of the statements in this thread have made me very confused. It sounds very counter-intuitive to me that a cheaper, slower machine will make less noise. But if that is the case, I will certainly go that way.
...
Again, from some of the comments in this thread it would seem that the slowest of those (i5 and 775M) would give me the most quiet machine. But is that really true? And how much performance do I sacrifice by picking the slower chips? I hope somebody with insight or experience can guide me making this choice.
Rather than throw around questions about technical issues (which may be misinterpreted, with answers that might even be misguided), why not just consider that your iMac may simply be defective, and replacing with the same model may fix your issue.
(Others do report very low fan noise, even with the RiMac.)
Because it's not that easy. If I was convinced or strongly believed that it was defective, I would turn it in for repair. But as it is, I think it's more likely that this is just the way it is meant to be. Though the comments in this thread are not consistent, that is the sense I get.
Under this condition, I feel I run a great risk by turning it in for repair. If Apple decides it has no defect, it will likely be too late to return it and I may even have to pay a fee for having them check it out. I am not willing to run that risk.
Because it's not that easy. If I was convinced or strongly believed that it was defective, I would turn it in for repair. But as it is, I think it's more likely that this is just the way it is meant to be. Though the comments in this thread are not consistent, that is the sense I get.
Under this condition, I feel I run a great risk by turning it in for repair. If Apple decides it has no defect, it will likely be too late to return it and I may even have to pay a fee for having them check it out. I am not willing to run that risk.
Do you run the risk of Apple finding nothing wrong? Sure, but you also have the (equal) possibility that Apple will say yours is faulty, and repair or replace it.
You say you are disappointed - why not give Apple the opportunity to make that right? You may be pleasantly surprised!
To put this in a different light, keep in mind that folks with no complaints will be less likely to post in these threads.
Do you run the risk of Apple finding nothing wrong? Sure, but you also have the (equal) possibility that Apple will say yours is faulty, and repair or replace it.
It's a yes or no - equal chance
If you don't want to give Apple the opportunity to help, or even hear for yourself that other RiMacs are quiet (or just as noisy), then that's not on Apple.
We could hear them, but really?....not that loud at all. Even with both of them sitting side by side on the table while we were playing WoW together for several hours at a time(cpu temps around 85C and gpu temps around 100-105C) they weren't anywhere near as loud as our 2012 rMBP's that we've been playing WoW on since we got them in June 2012. If the heat kicked on in the house it would basically mask the noise of our iMacs. Personally, I don't consider these things to be too loud one single bit.
...
Actually it is on Apple wether or not it's defective. I have received a machine that I'm not satisfied with. Unless I completely misunderstand the return policy, that means I can return it.
...
Loudness is subjective. Fan speed is a better measurement, I think. Was the fan running at max speed (2700 rpm) when the GPU temp was at 100-105C?
To put this in a different light, keep in mind that folks with no complaints will be less likely to post in these threads.
It was around 2300-2400 rpm I believe. But we also had two iMacs next to each other...which is likely to be louder than a single machine running at the full 2700 rpm.
But I was only doing what another person on these forums were doing (playing WoW) and that other person described it as unbearable and actually returned their iMac for a non-retina.
Within 14 days after purchase, you can return your iMac, and you don't need to provide a reason. - or doesn't fit in your desk, or wrong color, or too heavy,
Or just tell Apple it's too noisy. They can't resell without repairs/inspection for a returned unit. Get your refund, or a like-for-like replacement.
I still say you should check a different RiMac for objectionable noise.
My situation is a little different from the case discussed here, but I think it might be helpful to some to share my experience. So here it is.
I have been badly annoyed in the past by the very loud fan noise coming from a G5 iMac (almost ten years ago now...) and I was uneasy when I started thinking about ordering a retina iMac. When I read about the heat-fan problems that people seemed to have with the maxed out retina iMac, I decided it would be safer to go for the i5/290x.
I have had the base version for more than a week now and I can say that the noise and the heat have been very tolerable. I don't do anything very demanding on a computer (Word, Preview, Safari, iPhoto) and I haven't heard the fan accelerate noticeably. There is, to be sure, a certain fan noise, but it is discreet. It is certainly nothing compared to my old G5. But it is more noticeable than on my 2012 retina MacBook Pro (which is so silent; how I wish all computers were like this).
This comparison has limited value, but I would say that the fan of the base version makes no more noise than the noise of a refrigerator fan in another room with the door closed. I say this because I found myself unable to discern if the noise I heard at my desk came from my retina iMac or from the refrigerator in the next room, which is probably a good thing for the computer.
Anyway, when I decided to return the computer (not because of the fan, but because of the screen (which had some clouding and bleed), I was bold enough to order the maxed out version (i7/295x), because I wanted to see for myself if the complaints about the noise/heat have been exaggerated and because I felt that my base retina iMac was somewhat slower than my 2012 retina MacBook Pro (which annoys me a little). I will receive the i7/295x in less than a week and I will be able to compare then. I hope to be pleasantly surprised, but I might also be proved wrong, in which case, I don't know really what I will do.
I'll mention this again. It just MAY be that a fresh install on a formatted drive with Yosemite downloaded rather than from recovery disk just MIGHT shake something loose (figuratively speaking)
I had various issues with mine which I had migrated from my mini that were ALL solved and then some after I did the above. It was like a freaking miracle.
I went from hating the machine to LOVING the machine.
Easier than returning, for sure, which is something I also did not want to deal with.
Thank you for that. No doubt it is subjective. 2300 rpm is too loud for my taste when running ordinary tasks. 2700 rpm is unbearable unless it's for only short periods of time...
I will try doing that before returning it. It's a good way to clean the disk, anyway.![]()