imac

[kroupa]

a

 

[simsaladimbamba]

Yes.

FAT32 (File Allocation Table)

• Read/Write FAT32 from both native Windows and native Mac OS X.
• Maximum file size: 4GB.
• Maximum volume size: 2TB

NTFS (Windows NT File System)

• Read/Write NTFS from native Windows.
• Read only NTFS from native Mac OS X
  [*]To Read/Write/Format NTFS from Mac OS X: Install NTFS-3G for Mac OS X (free)
  
• Some have reported problems using Tuxera (approx 33USD).
• Native NTFS support can be enabled in Snow Leopard, but is not advisable, due to instability.
• AirPort Extreme (802.11n) and Time Capsule do not support NTFS
• Maximum file size: 16 TB
• Maximum volume size: 256TB

HFS+ (Hierarchical File System, a.k.a. Mac OS Extended)

• Read/Write HFS+ from native Mac OS X
• Required for Time Machine or Carbon Copy Cloner backups of Mac internal hard drive.
• To Read/Write HFS+ from Windows, Install MacDrive
• To Read HFS+ (but not Write) from Windows, Install HFSExplorer
• Maximum file size: 8EiB
• Maximum volume size: 8EiB

exFAT (FAT64)

• Supported in Mac OS X only in 10.6.5 or later.
• Not all Windows versions support exFAT. See disadvantages.
• exFAT (Extended File Allocation Table)
• AirPort Extreme (802.11n) and Time Capsule do not support exFAT
• Maximum file size: 16 EiB
• Maximum volume size: 64 ZiB

To edit your thread title to a descriptive one, just click on the

button on the bottom right of your original post and then click the

button below your message.

 

[kroupa]

a

 

[simsaladimbamba]

a yes or no answer would have been much better.

The first word of my post was "yes", the I gave you additional information about what file systems can be read and written to by Mac OS X.
Then I just gave you the means to edit your thread title, as two threads with the title "imac" within ten minutes are not really much help for you.

Or was the part about file systems too complicated?
Maybe you could elaborate more, as guessing games are not my strong suit.

 

[kroupa]

a

 

[wordoflife]

two threads with the same title are no help to me?
why? they both got answered, what do you care if i have the same title or not?
elaborate more? i thought it was a pretty simple question.
can you guess what i am thinking now? ohh thats right guessing
is not your strong suit.

Because other people may have the same question and they would never be able to find this thread with a title called "imac".

Plus, he answered your question quite nicely. Whats the problem?

 

[simsaladimbamba]

two threads with the same title are no help to me?
why? they both got answered, what do you care if i have the same title or not?
elaborate more? i thought it was a pretty simple question.
can you guess what i am thinking now? ohh thats right guessing
is not your strong suit.

"**** you" is what you are thinking.

But be my guest and keep that attitude, and you were just lucky I guess (yeah, not my strong suit), as I answered your two threads. And what is the problem with using a descriptive thread title? More work? I even linked you on how to maximise your troubleshooting, so why the attitude?

Anyway, here comes mine:
Sorry again for ****ing helping you, or trying to ****ing help you.
I need ****ing help, or why would I help ****ing ****s?