autrefois
macrumors 65816
They have a free video editing app called iMovie, but it’s not their main focus.
I see what you did there. ?
(Even though I’m sure no bad joke was intended, on your part at least!)
They have a free video editing app called iMovie, but it’s not their main focus.
If they can’t get the interface right for iMovie on iPad, how would Final Cut Pro look like.If only they released final cut pro on the ipadbeen waiting for pro software on the iPad for 10 years and feels like we’re further than ever
Mental choice between fcpX or Echelon Bike...Final Cut Pro goes for $299, probably far steeper than most want to pay (especially as a lot of folks in this thread would rather use the free iMovie and complain about it’s lack of features than spending $39.00 for LumaFusion and actually editing video).![]()
It takes photos and makes a movie from them. Many photos are portrait.Good! People that film in portrait don’t need encouraging.
Designing such an app to be touch first would be nigh on impossible I would have thought without being heavily stripped down. And then what would be the point?If only they released final cut pro on the ipadbeen waiting for pro software on the iPad for 10 years and feels like we’re further than ever
I don’t think “value” is the right word. Apple sees the iPad as serving a different function. They see it as fully capable of being a computer, but is not a laptop. It is a touch device, and as such, apps must be written in a certain way to make them touch friendly. Something like Final Cut Pro is an exceedingly difficult app to make touch friendly on a tiny screen. For all we know Apple has been working on a version for years, but something that complex can’t just be recompiled and be finished. The entire user interface has to be rewritten from scratch. Some features probably aren’t even possible on tiny touch screens. Too many think laptops, tablets, and desktops are just interchangeable and that everything is just as easy on one as the other.Given that we have iMovie and LumaFusion on iPad [which is basically a lite version of FCP], I don't see the issue. I've come to the conclusion that Apple does not value iPadOS to the same standard as MacOS. Therefore, Apple has accepted that LumaFusuion is the best option.
Lumafusion is the best alternativeIf only they released final cut pro on the ipadbeen waiting for pro software on the iPad for 10 years and feels like we’re further than ever