India's loss.
The Samsung is strong in this one, mmhmm.
So Tim, did the BJP and Modi's propaganda bit for them and got nothing in return ...
Nice one, Tim!
He did say, after all, Apple plans to be in India for the next 1,000 years.
Russia would be much better choice Tim
Funny thing is that this devices are really popular among poor people. When I used to live in Brazil, you would see people in the favelas who barely have food, but would still manage to have a smart phone. I guess some of them were probably stolen...Apparently the government isn't really focused on these folks, but more on those who are near poverty and in dire need of jobs. I personally don't even think they can afford even a refurbished iPhone, or even would want too.
Good points. Although I don't feel Apple's margins are that high on the iPhone. If the raw materials cost ~$200, a 200% markup price isn't that high is it? I'd imagine there are products out there with 1000%+ markups.Usually, in arguments, both sides are right or reasonable to some degree. In this case, both sides are wrong and unreasonable.
India isn't acknowledging their working class's comparatively impoverished existence. Apparently, they aren't familiar with the adage, "beggars can't be choosey".
Cook, on the otherhand, has balls to blame taxes and tariffs while acting as though Apple's notorious margins are already as thin as possible.
You are absolutely correct. When I was there, I was the only soul with an iPhone for miles and miles. And quite the envy of locals I might add; had to be careful not to use it in public at times.I'm in India right now and via my none scientific visual mini-study there are very few iPhones. In the city I'm in any type of Android phone seems to be the most popular.
Sounds tasty. French fries with gravy ... and apples.Yeah, Apple and Poutine - imagine that.
Hell, WE NEED THAT LAW here. Apple should be required to make 30% of the goods it sells in the USA IN the USA!!! Sadly, I doubt Apple could achieve 10% of that figure right now.
Long live Ireland says Apple!
Quote:
On Apple's proposal to import refurbished phones and sell in India, Sitharaman said, "We would not be in favour of whatever you may call them -- used but refashioned, remodelled, updated... used goods. We are not in favour of bringing them here."Knee-jerk reaction without fully understanding the situation. This is what you get when people who don't understand something are in charge of making decisions.
Some facts for you, Ms. Sitharaman:
If India applies the same policy to all manufacturers, then fine, but to single Apple out (possibly been bribed?) is just doing your citizens a disservice.
- Apple makes reliable products that last for years.
- Products refurbished by Apple come with a full warranty and quite often are better than a brand new product. Bugs have been found and fixed, hardware updated.
All kinds of things get said ... ten months later, it was gone ...
"Jan. 19, 1989: Despite signs of system failure, the East German leadership remained stubborn. Government head Erich Honecker declares "the Wall will be there in 50, even 100 years.""
[doublepost=1464641508][/doublepost]
We should respond in kind. Let's start with call centers. If 30% of the call centers presented to consumers here aren't manned by Americans then we should prevent the company from operating the call center.
I can speak from first hand experience. I had a bad sleep/wake switch on my 5S and got it replaced, no questions asked with a refurb. The phone looked and worked as good as a brand new phone. It was the equivalent of a certified ore-owned Mercedes. No one is passing them off as junk are they?You know all that first hand or just working the hearsay trail?
Why would Tim even visit India where homosexuality is still crime?
And if there isn't at least a 30% thinner iPhone this year, Ive should be made to apologise, unapologetically.
You mean optimistic. Opportunistic is the wrong word here. Grammar police out.Apple is opportunistic about increasing its presence in India, where its market share is estimated to be only around 2 percent.
Let me get this right. You want the US to apply a policy to India only in retaliation for India not exempting Apple from a policy that India applies to all companies around the world. Well hell, that makes sense.We should respond in kind. Let's start with call centers. If 30% of the call centers presented to consumers here aren't manned by Americans then we should prevent the company from operating the call center.
I'm not understanding India's logic. Or perhaps I'm not understanding the situation presented. Apple already sold iPhones to retail locations. So the market was already there... Are those retailers unable to resell used phones? Ones that get turned in for an upgrade? Or are they just banning Apple from bringing used phones from outside of India, or are they banning them from reselling any good regardless of their orginal sale/buy-back from Apple.... Super perplexed.