Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

alabanco

macrumors member
Original poster
Mar 23, 2008
58
0
I wonder is it possible to port and install Quicktime X in Leopard ? I really doubt that there is no way to see pure Quicktime screen with hidden controls
 
I think that it's a 64bit app

But that would be great, if there way a way to hide all the controls and get that sleek control panel when pointing.
 
I wonder is it possible to port and install Quicktime X in Leopard ? I really doubt that there is no way to see pure Quicktime screen with hidden controls

I don't think it's possible. Maybe with some coding knowledge, but I failed through dragging and dropping so it won't be simple.
 
I don't need screen recording as there is a screenflow app for that which is more convenient

I don't need trimming

I would like to have at least quicktime with controls that can be hided like in Quicktime X. SO is it possible to have at least that particular thing ?
 
I really doubt that will work, as Quicktime X brought in a lot of under the hood stuff. And is more than just quicktimeplayer.app in the app folder
 
Not unless Apple make a Leopard version, which is highly unlikely regarding their viewpoint on legacy.

Want to hear smth weird and wonderful at the same time?
Try to open video in iTunes - it perfectly show you Quicktime X with hidden controls. So who is your Daddy, then?

All these talks about special codes and legacy is a B..ll.sh..t! I knew Quicktime X can perfectly be in Leopard. Since SL still very raw and buggy I want Quicktime X to be in Leopard
 
Want to hear smth weird and wonderful at the same time?
Try to open video in iTunes - it perfectly show you Quicktime X with hidden controls. So who is your Daddy, then?

All these talks about special codes and legacy is a B..ll.sh..t! I knew Quicktime X can perfectly be in Leopard. Since SL still very raw and buggy I want Quicktime X to be in Leopard

It doesn't show you Quicktime X. Or anything like it. Quicktime X is the underlying playback architecture, not the UI. It's the CPU accelerated, simplified, streamlined playback architecture based on the code developed for the iPhone. The Quicktime Player in SL UI is based on the iTunes video API. To see the difference take two identical machines and try playing back the video on each. If it's in a format that can be played by Quicktime X (remember most can't and still use Quicktime 7 on SL) and the machine has a decent GPU then the CPU usage will be very different.
 
Want to hear smth weird and wonderful at the same time?
Try to open video in iTunes - it perfectly show you Quicktime X with hidden controls. So who is your Daddy, then?

All these talks about special codes and legacy is a B..ll.sh..t! I knew Quicktime X can perfectly be in Leopard. Since SL still very raw and buggy I want Quicktime X to be in Leopard

Of course you could always just buy SL when you want.. if its too buggy for you then just wait, until like 10.6.3 which ought to be relatively solid.. 25 quid for SL aint exactly a huge jump up from the Quicktime pro license which used to exist.. would solve some of your issues no?
 
Want to hear smth weird and wonderful at the same time?
Try to open video in iTunes - it perfectly show you Quicktime X with hidden controls. So who is your Daddy, then?

All these talks about special codes and legacy is a B..ll.sh..t! I knew Quicktime X can perfectly be in Leopard. Since SL still very raw and buggy I want Quicktime X to be in Leopard

How is SL raw and buggy? except for a few applications almost everything works perfectly fine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.