Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Badrottie

Suspended
Original poster
May 8, 2011
4,317
336
Los Angeles
Not sure if this is really slow? Take a look at this picture….

DiskSpeedTest.png
 

FrancoisC

macrumors 6502a
Jan 27, 2009
546
281
Montreal, Qc
Here it is.

Specs in sig

Edit: Do you have TRIM Enabled?

if not, go there: http://www.groths.org/?page_id=322

It's discussed somewhere in this forum.

After enabling TRIM, reset your mac in single user mode and run this command: "fsck -ffy" (Without quotes) it's going to trim the unused sector and maybe give you back your speed.
 

Attachments

  • DiskSpeedTest.png
    DiskSpeedTest.png
    366.2 KB · Views: 68
Last edited:

Badrottie

Suspended
Original poster
May 8, 2011
4,317
336
Los Angeles
Here it is.

Specs in sig

Edit: Do you have TRIM Enabled?

if not, go there: http://www.groths.org/?page_id=322

It's discussed somewhere in this forum.

After enabling TRIM, reset your mac in single user mode and run this command: "fsck -ffy" (Without quotes) it's going to trim the unused sector and maybe give you back your speed.

Thank you very much I have done what you suggested…no improved performance at all. I guess your sig is newer than my old mbp?
 

riptideMBP

macrumors 6502
May 29, 2011
260
0
I have sata II as well, and my read speed is higher than yours even though my drive is speced for lower speeds, so I think something might be wrong with yours
 

FrancoisC

macrumors 6502a
Jan 27, 2009
546
281
Montreal, Qc
You're using SATA I not SATA II and those speeds are correct for SATA I. (150MB/s max theoretical speed)

http://www.everymac.com/systems/app...k-pro-core-2-duo-2.2-15-santa-rosa-specs.html


You're right, sata 1... Then he's geting normal speed for his setup.

I didn't think about that, I thought that even the first gen intel mac had sata II.

Oh well, you learn something new everyday!


And to the op, even if you are not getting full speed, just the access time of the SSD make it so much better than even the fastest HDD!
 

Badrottie

Suspended
Original poster
May 8, 2011
4,317
336
Los Angeles
You're using SATA I not SATA II and those speeds are correct for SATA I. (150MB/s max theoretical speed)

http://www.everymac.com/systems/app...k-pro-core-2-duo-2.2-15-santa-rosa-specs.html

thank you

----------

You're right, sata 1... Then he's geting normal speed for his setup.

I didn't think about that, I thought that even the first gen intel mac had sata II.

Oh well, you learn something new everyday!


And to the op, even if you are not getting full speed, just the access time of the SSD make it so much better than even the fastest HDD!

Yeah before HDD and after SSD not much improvement but I will save SSD for next MBP anyway.

The bottom line SSD gives me a new experience! :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.