Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,162
38,937


Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger has retired following a challenging tenure marked by the company's struggles to compete against Apple and other major chipmakers.

pat-gelsinger-intel.jpg

Intel today announced that Gelsinger, who served as the company's CEO since early 2021, officially stepped down on December 1, 2024, concluding a 40-plus-year career at the company. Gelsinger's leadership began with bold aspirations, particularly in addressing the growing influence of Apple Silicon. Intel faced a significant challenge when Apple announced in 2020 that it would transition its Mac lineup from Intel processors to its own custom-designed chips, beginning with the M1, which outperform Intel's offerings. This decision signaled a substantial shift in the industry and a major blow to Intel's dominance.

Gelsinger rejoined Intel in 2021, replacing then-CEO Bob Swan, at a critical moment for the company. His tenure began with a striking statement at an all-hands meeting, where he described Apple as a "lifestyle company" and emphasized Intel's need to deliver superior products. He said, "We have to deliver better products to the PC ecosystem than any possible thing that a lifestyle company in Cupertino can do. We have to be that good."

Apple's move to Apple Silicon was highly significant for the chip industry. The M1 chip, built on an architecture designed in-house by Apple, offered unparalleled performance-per-watt, reshaping consumer expectations for computing power and energy efficiency. Subsequent iterations, including the M2, M3, and M4 families of chips, further cemented Apple's lead over Intel. Under Gelsinger's leadership, Intel responded with marketing campaigns that sought to highlight some of the perceived shortcomings of Apple's Macs. Some of these campaigns included former Apple "I'm a Mac" commercial star Justin Long.

In an interview with Axios shortly after assuming his role as CEO, Gelsinger acknowledged Intel's "stumbles" in retaining Apple's business and stated his intent to "create a better chip" to win Apple back. He expressed a broader vision for Intel to become a foundry partner for companies like Apple, saying, "Apple is a customer, and I hope to make them a big foundry customer because today they're wholly dependent on Taiwan Semiconductor."

Despite Gelsinger's efforts, Intel subsequently faced significant challenges. For example, the company struggled with delays in its 18A manufacturing process, which was intended to be a key component of its competitive recovery. Apple and other major companies such as Qualcomm passed on the technology due to reliability issues. Meanwhile, Apple's partnership with TSMC has only further deepened.

Gelsinger's tenure also coincided with a period of rapid advancement in AI technology, where Intel also found itself at a disadvantage. Nvidia, whose GPUs are widely used in AI workloads, captured significant market share as demand for AI-related processing surged. Intel's Gaudi line of AI accelerators, intended to compete with Nvidia's offerings, failed to gain traction. Meanwhile, Apple's custom silicon chips include a dedicated Neural Engine for machine learning and AI operations.

Gelsinger sought to restore Intel's manufacturing competitiveness by spearheading ambitious plans to build new fabrication facilities, including a massive complex in Ohio, supported by funding from the CHIPS Act. However, these long-term investment efforts did little to address the immediate challenges facing the company.

Intel's revenue and market valuation declined significantly during Gelsinger's tenure. By 2024, the company's share price had fallen by nearly 50% for the year, while Nvidia and Apple continue to thrive. Analysts estimate Intel will record its first annual net loss since 1986. Intel's stock price today rose 5% following the news of Gelsinger's departure.

In his parting remarks, Gelsinger reflected on his career and the challenges he faced during his time as CEO, stating "Leading Intel has been the honor of my lifetime. I can look back with pride at all that we have accomplished together." His departure leaves Intel in a transitional phase, with interim co-CEOs David Zinsner and Michelle Johnston Holthaus tasked with steering the company as it searches for a permanent successor.

Article Link: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger Retires Amid Company's Decline
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Jhonjhon236
What an amazing CEO. I guess the lifestyle brand wasn’t the lifestyle for most. Small insult from a small CEO.

Intel sat and tried to pedal the same old excuses too often and people can only take so much BS.

Funny how the companies we thought never could fail often do. You have to keep innovating even when at the top. I think greed was their undoing.
 
Digging that company out of the gutter won’t be easy.
That's a bit harsh.

Intel decided to avoid developing in-house competition to its x86/x64 legacy product line, which had served it so well for so long.

That is not unusual for a company with a successful product. They ride the horse for as long as possible.

Intel has many products, of course. So in reality it can continue for awhile servicing the market with those products.

However, if it can't show real progress in up-market (and therefor high-profit margin) products then Intel could go the way of former glorious American companies like Xerox, DEC, etc.
 
In life ... time eventually catches up with you. For the unaware, time can be cruel.... but awareness to time and trends can create great opportunity. For those who sit on their arse in complacency..... darkness awaits. Once darkness hits it's check mate, game set and match.
 
What strikes me the most, is the very similar path of many "gigantic-established-dinosaur-companies" go down the drain. It reminds me on Boeing and Nasa. Nasa? Wait till Elon Musk is taking office.
I really feel sorry for Intel. I guess the size of a company doesn't make it innovative, does it? One can only imagine how difficult it was for Mr. Gelsinger towards the end of his career. Usually those situation seems unfixable because of passed time and missed opportunities a half decade earlier. My humble respect and admiration for this man. There comes a time where small hiccups add up over time to a desasterous situation that wrecks the whole company if not taken care of in time or early on. The classic project management dilemma, - supervising sheep AND building the fences at the SAME time.
 
Last edited:
Intel is the perfect example of what can happen to a company once they become complacent and fail to innovate. The market is brutal.
Apple is almost/already at that point... Intel with incremental yearly upgrades which is what Apple is doing for many years now...

I was actually referring to iPhones and the A series SoC but I guess the net reaction would not change at all...
 
Last edited:
Pat was 2 generations behind the trend. He talked about cloud computing as the industry was moving toward AI. He was talking about 5 nm when the industry was moving toward 3 nm. You cannot close the gap when your talking point is that far behind.
 

Intel faced a significant challenge when Apple announced in 2020 that it would transition its Mac lineup from Intel processors to its own custom-designed chips, beginning with the M1, which outperform Intel's offerings. This decision signaled a substantial shift in the industry and a major blow to Intel's dominance.

With such a small market share, how can Apple silicon be a major blow to Intel?
 
Should have diversified their chip line to include ARM variants over a decade ago. Not saying X86 processors don't have their place, but hedging would have kept them in the conversation. Now it looks like they may be going the Nokia route.
They tried that with XScale in the 2000s and sold it in 2006.

They also sold their stake in ARM this year and have tried to become a FAB etc. So many failed opportunities over the years.
 
Ran that company into the ground. He won’t be missed.
Former CEO Bob Swan left a mess putting financials over quality products. Gelsinger's abrupt resignation is far more a reflection on Swan than it is on Gelsinger.
The problems at Intel started long before Gelsinger's stint as CEO.

Intel started falling behind during Brian Krzanich's helm. During his tenure, Intel struggled in the mobile chip space, eventually giving up. He failed to lead Intel in developing smaller 10 nanometer chips. It was delay after delay after delay


Their blunders allowed AMD to catch up with their Zen-based CPUs. It was these Ryzen chips that brought back the enthusiasts like how the Athlon chips did nearly 2 decades prior. This is when AMD started taking marketshare from Intel, eventually allowing them to surpassing Intel in market cap



Things got worse when Bob Swan took over hence his short stint as CEO.

I believe Gelsinger did his best under the circumstances and mess he was given.
 
Last edited:
Apple is almost/already at that point... Intel with incremental yearly upgrades which is what Apple is doing for many years now...

What?

M4 Mac Mini? It is a PowerHorse that will not be beaten by anything else at this price.

And the M4 by itself was certainly not an ‘incremental’ upgrade ala Intel, but quite a leap forward. M4 Max just as powerful as an M2 Ultra, for example

And the Vision Pro clearly shows that Apple still has balls.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.