Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Longplays

Suspended
Original poster
May 30, 2023
1,308
1,158
Still not 5nm or even an SoC with an iGPU that has better than Intel iGPU performance

core-ultra-family-crop.png


 
  • Haha
Reactions: Adult80HD
Much clearer... :(

* Core Ultra 7 1003H (16C/22T)
* Core Ultra 7 1002H (16C/22T)
* Core Ultra 5 1003H (14C/18T)
 
Its so obvious that Intel is using Apple's nomenclature so that clueless consumers will be confused and buy their chips instead of the Apple Silicon chips :p
 
IDK, Superlatives have always been used in marketing. Especially if we're talking about touting performance. lol.
 
Intel lineup is a complete joke.
Different singlecore and gpu performances for each chip on each generation; celeron, atom, i3, i5, i7, i9, xeon… The consumer always get screwed.
 
The rebranding itself should indicate how worried Intel actually is regarding Apple Silicon. It feels like a lame attempt to capitalize on "ultra" branding, and it could be a way to restart their numbering scheme

If Apple trademarked anything including the word "Ultra" for it's SoCs, they could (in theory) have a trademark case against Intel for this one.
 
I heard about this on the LTT podcast. I think it's definitely related to Apple's naming scheme. If lucky, Intel will confuse customers into thinking it's the same or similar... What ever happened to i3, i5, i7? That was easy. Didn't even know there was an i9.. since when?!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.