What company, apple?A definite pump and dumper. Cook needed to resist this guy in a big way. He let a raider spend the cash down on useless buybacks instead of investing in R&D. Now the company has big debt and no plan for the future,
The headphone jack is going on all cell phones Apple will do it first.
Haha, I meant the major cellphone manufactures. But that shows where it's all going. I was on their site the other day looking at their car prototype.Too late, by a couple of years. It won't stop apple from claiming they were first.
Oppo 2014
http://www.theverge.com/2014/10/29/7091055/this-android-smartphone-is-too-thin-for-a-headphone-jack
LeEco has 3 of them out now.
http://www.androidauthority.com/first-phones-without-headphone-port-run-android-687910/
To Apple's credit, they've ridden a wave of hype for years. Complacency was bound to set in, temping them to coast while engaged in serious profit taking.
Now it's time to get back to business. If Apple applies themselves they can right the ship. If they choose denial they'll have an even bigger problem to manage.
Yeah, so your perceived "mismanagement of the company" has absolutely NOTHING to do with any of Icahn's reasoning. I happen to think he's nothing more than an opportunist who is anything but genuine, but "mismanagement of the company" is not listed anywhere in his statements. Probably because that's simply not what's happening.It's because stock markets and stock prices are forward looking. You may be doing well now, but that doesn't mean you'll be raking in profits next year.
The reason P/E valuations of Alphabet or Facebook are higher than Apple despite lower dollar figure profits is because investors think they have tremendous growth potential compared to Apple, and so want to buy/hold on to a growth stock.
AAPL, according to investors and traders, seems to have peaked and may well be on the decline in terms of profits and revenue it takes in. And many investors don't want to buy/hold on to a stock that won't grow, unless it was being bought back by the company. Your opinion may be different, but the stock price reflects the general opinion.
[doublepost=1461889326][/doublepost]
I'm not so sure I agree with you on Icahn doing a simple "Pump and Dump AAPL." If you look at his reasoning for when he invested in AAPL, 2 to 3 years ago, he had all the right reasons. Things were going well for Apple (perceived as a growth company then), and Tim Cook seemed like he knew what he was doing. Unfortunately, as almost everyone agrees, Apple seems to have lost "it."
Don't blame an investor like Icahn for making a bet on a company, and then changing his bet when the company management started mishandling the company years after his investment.
Speculators are not a problem. If you buy something and hope for it to go up in value, guess what? You're a speculator. You are speculating that it will increase in value and allow you to sell to someone else, not unlike Icahn. I'd guess most casual stock market participants think this way and are in fact, speculators. That's a complete difference from INVESTORS who are market participants who value dividends, cash flow, and a protection of capital.
Speculation is always a short-term game. Speculative bubbles, like oil or real-estate (in recent history), always work themselves out. The most speculative participants tend to lose their ass because they rarely see the end coming. Thus, vilifying speculators and blaming them for driving up the price of things is incorrect.
What drives up the price of everything we buy over the long-term is inflation and a refusal of governments and central banks to let asset prices drop. The fiscal policies of the US government over the last 16 years are a complete screw job to savers and people making moderate earnings.
Haha, I meant the major cellphone manufactures. But that shows where it's all going. I was on their site the other day looking at their car prototype.
Apple sales also fell 26 percent in greater China in the second quarter of 2016.
Yeah well the Apple crowd carried on for a year about the 30 pin connector. But wireless charging or smart connector chargers will do just fine. I have Ultimate Ear pros that cost more than my iPhone, you just have to adapt and move on.While I agree that they have a way to go oppo is rising pretty fast. In a dropping celphone market where both samsung and apple dropped oppo doubled theirs. One thing to note though is the thin, headphone jack phone went over like a lead bloon. Most of the comments I saw were against the lack of a headphone jack.
http://9to5google.com/2016/04/28/oppo-huawei-sales/
Personally I could go for usb-c headphones over lightning connector ones. From what I have seen there are already other companies coming out with usb-c ones. Then again having to choose between charging or using headphones would make it a harder decision.
you just have to adapt and move on.
Your right about that for sure, I've traveled all over Central and South Amercia. I also have nieces and nephews in Peru. We here do tend to obsess about things that are trival in comparison, thank you so much for the reality check.Or move elsewhere. It's an easy choice to me, apple priced me out of an iphone of a decent size. There are a lot of countries where many of the people can barely afford a used iphone, expensive headphones out of the question. I never see anyone with anything more than earbuds. I truly doubt all of the android phones will drop it especially in places like here, latin america, so I see apple losing out here. It will take a few years though because most that buy iphones typicaly get one several generations back, they sell more older models new here.
People in 3rd world countries do not get to make 1st world adaptations. Headphones more expensive than an iphone is a 1st world choice.
I don't think that it's Cook that has to leave. It's all the untouchables below him that at the last presentation seemed like an old gang of old dudes in a country club.
Your right about that for sure, I've traveled all over Central and South Amercia. I also have nieces and nephews in Peru. We here do tend to obsess about things that are trival in comparison, thank you so much for the reality check.
This is the same guy who kept talking about how he really believed in Apple. What a slimeball.
And who exactly is responsible for keeping those "old dudes" below him?
Why is he a slime ball? He bought low and sold high - BINGO. Believes in Apple - patience to a point is a virtue - patience beyond some point is stupidity. AAPL has been a crap performer for the last 4 years of Cook's 5 year CEO tenure.
There has been plenty of inflation. In assets. Real estate and equities are up over 100% in the past seven years since the crisis. The middle class who don't own assets are stuck with savings earning 0%. This is exactly government messing with savers and benefitting the 1%.We've had basically no inflation in the U.S. over those last 16 years, so I'm not sure how you think our government is messing with savers and people making moderate earnings. It has almost gotten to the point where it is scary and weird how low inflation has been and for how long.
Theoretically this is more tax efficient since dividends are taxes and share buy backs increase the value of shares by reversing dilution.
Apple is $100 billion in debt thanks to activist investor and con man Carl.