Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A definite pump and dumper. Cook needed to resist this guy in a big way. He let a raider spend the cash down on useless buybacks instead of investing in R&D. Now the company has big debt and no plan for the future,
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleXXXa
People have been played in this game before Apple stock has dropped at much larger percentages and under Steve Jobs reign. I've bought Apple stock since 2005. I've learned to play the cycle. It's fueled by large investors who take the stock down fueled on rumors and here say. The press then gets involved. And it goes down. Then the big players buy in then sell high or hold after it all calms down. What very few are saying is that this quarter was the second largest quarter ever for the iPhone.
2016 - 50 billion
, 2015 - 58 billion
, 2014 - 45 billion
, 2013, - 43 billion
, 2012 - 39 billion
, 2011 - 24 billion
, 2010 - 20 billion
, 2009 - 8 billion
, 2008 - 7.9 billion, all the same quarter different years. Yes it's a eight billion dollar difference. The S cycle reversed in sales. There was pent up demand for larger screen iPhones. All previous S models sold more than their predecessors. So I will by more as always and play the cycle. Apple guidance for this quarter was disclosed at the last earnings call. And it was right on the money for the sales. The anylysts new this for three months it was no surprise.
 
The headphone jack is going on all cell phones Apple will do it first.

Too late, by a couple of years. It won't stop apple from claiming they were first.

Oppo 2014

http://www.theverge.com/2014/10/29/7091055/this-android-smartphone-is-too-thin-for-a-headphone-jack

LeEco launched 3 of them out now that take USB Type-C digital headphones. They released a couple of those also.

http://www.androidauthority.com/first-phones-without-headphone-port-run-android-687910/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AleXXXa
Haha, I meant the major cellphone manufactures. But that shows where it's all going. I was on their site the other day looking at their car prototype.
 
To Apple's credit, they've ridden a wave of hype for years. Complacency was bound to set in, temping them to coast while engaged in serious profit taking.

Now it's time to get back to business. If Apple applies themselves they can right the ship. If they choose denial they'll have an even bigger problem to manage.

I'm sure they're in the process of doing something effective about it, but the fruit of that endeavor probably won't present itself until next year at the earliest in the form of a sexy, new iPhone design with mLED and other goodies. 2016 will be a less than stellar year (compared to the last couple of years) for the iPhone line and a downright terrible year for iPad sales. When the iPhone provides close to 70% of your revenue and you have your first decline in iPhone sales, things will definitely be happening at Apple behind closed doors, but it takes time. Anniversary iPhone FTW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macdragonfl
It's because stock markets and stock prices are forward looking. You may be doing well now, but that doesn't mean you'll be raking in profits next year.

The reason P/E valuations of Alphabet or Facebook are higher than Apple despite lower dollar figure profits is because investors think they have tremendous growth potential compared to Apple, and so want to buy/hold on to a growth stock.

AAPL, according to investors and traders, seems to have peaked and may well be on the decline in terms of profits and revenue it takes in. And many investors don't want to buy/hold on to a stock that won't grow, unless it was being bought back by the company. Your opinion may be different, but the stock price reflects the general opinion.
[doublepost=1461889326][/doublepost]

I'm not so sure I agree with you on Icahn doing a simple "Pump and Dump AAPL." If you look at his reasoning for when he invested in AAPL, 2 to 3 years ago, he had all the right reasons. Things were going well for Apple (perceived as a growth company then), and Tim Cook seemed like he knew what he was doing. Unfortunately, as almost everyone agrees, Apple seems to have lost "it."

Don't blame an investor like Icahn for making a bet on a company, and then changing his bet when the company management started mishandling the company years after his investment.
Yeah, so your perceived "mismanagement of the company" has absolutely NOTHING to do with any of Icahn's reasoning. I happen to think he's nothing more than an opportunist who is anything but genuine, but "mismanagement of the company" is not listed anywhere in his statements. Probably because that's simply not what's happening.
 
Speculators are not a problem. If you buy something and hope for it to go up in value, guess what? You're a speculator. You are speculating that it will increase in value and allow you to sell to someone else, not unlike Icahn. I'd guess most casual stock market participants think this way and are in fact, speculators. That's a complete difference from INVESTORS who are market participants who value dividends, cash flow, and a protection of capital.

Speculation is always a short-term game. Speculative bubbles, like oil or real-estate (in recent history), always work themselves out. The most speculative participants tend to lose their ass because they rarely see the end coming. Thus, vilifying speculators and blaming them for driving up the price of things is incorrect.

What drives up the price of everything we buy over the long-term is inflation and a refusal of governments and central banks to let asset prices drop. The fiscal policies of the US government over the last 16 years are a complete screw job to savers and people making moderate earnings.

We've had basically no inflation in the U.S. over those last 16 years, so I'm not sure how you think our government is messing with savers and people making moderate earnings. It has almost gotten to the point where it is scary and weird how low inflation has been and for how long.
 
Haha, I meant the major cellphone manufactures. But that shows where it's all going. I was on their site the other day looking at their car prototype.

While I agree that they have a way to go oppo is rising pretty fast. In a dropping celphone market where both samsung and apple dropped oppo doubled theirs. One thing to note though is the thin, headphone jackless phone went over like a lead bloon. Most of the comments I saw were against the lack of a headphone jack.


http://9to5google.com/2016/04/28/oppo-huawei-sales/

Personally I could go for usb-c headphones over lightning connector ones. From what I have seen there are already other companies coming out with usb-c ones. Then again having to choose between charging or using headphones would make it a harder decision.
 
Last edited:
For folks who think Apple is done innovating I have one point to make.

2Q 2015: R&D $1.9 billion
2Q 2016: R&D $2.5 billion

$600 million more was spent in R&D last quarter than a year ago. And this trend of increased R&D spend has been going up for a while. Apple is cooking up some stuff. There is no doubt about this. We all know it is a Car. But it is probably several other things done and at a large scale. By way of comparison, Tesla's R&D in a YEAR is $700 million. Apple is increasing every quarter its R&D (on a year by year comparison) by a Tesla basically. They aren't spending that kind of money so they can make a thinner keyboard for the MacBook.
 
Here's something that really stood out to me.

Apple sales also fell 26 percent in greater China in the second quarter of 2016.

This is actually huge. China was/is spoke of as the "last frontier" so to speak where apple's market share was going to soar, it couldn't have topped out this quick and then had a 26% drop. I see this as a possible game changer for apple as I believe they were probably looking toward china to keep the upward growth.

I'm not saying apple is going under, just that I doubt they expected a 26% drop after about 2 years.

Yes, I know the dollar is strong. Tell me about it, times are tough here, but I don't think it would account for 26% drop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleXXXa
While I agree that they have a way to go oppo is rising pretty fast. In a dropping celphone market where both samsung and apple dropped oppo doubled theirs. One thing to note though is the thin, headphone jack phone went over like a lead bloon. Most of the comments I saw were against the lack of a headphone jack.


http://9to5google.com/2016/04/28/oppo-huawei-sales/

Personally I could go for usb-c headphones over lightning connector ones. From what I have seen there are already other companies coming out with usb-c ones. Then again having to choose between charging or using headphones would make it a harder decision.
Yeah well the Apple crowd carried on for a year about the 30 pin connector. But wireless charging or smart connector chargers will do just fine. I have Ultimate Ear pros that cost more than my iPhone, you just have to adapt and move on.
 
you just have to adapt and move on.

Or move elsewhere. It's an easy choice to me, apple priced me out of an iphone of a decent size. There are a lot of countries where many of the people can barely afford a used iphone, expensive headphones out of the question. I never see anyone with anything more than earbuds. I truly doubt all of the android phones will drop it especially in places like here, latin america, so I see apple losing out here. It will take a few years though because most that buy iphones typicaly get one several generations back, they sell more older models new here.

People in 3rd world countries do not get to make 1st world adaptations. Headphones more expensive than an iphone is a 1st world choice.

In fact with the current sales structure of upsell to get something decent I see them pushing myself, and I'm sure others in places like this, out of the picture.
 
Last edited:
Given how much $$$ Apple has in their pocket, and their dividends, I think this is a stock to buy and hold, and set up a DRIP. They will be around 20+ years from now, and there is no trend away from their core products to something else (akin to Microsoft missing the smartphone movement). And they have shown the ability to jump on the trends of others and make them better (e.g. iPod was not first portable music player). Their services business will continue to grow. They are still trying to disrupt television and will disrupt automotive industry. They could get involved in green technology development and drive that ahead, given their repeated trumpeting of their concern for the environment. Stop worrying about today and buy/hold. That's what I did with AAPL since 1999. Doing it again with Facebook since last year. If you want to make a quick buck the most reliable way is to get a second job, LOL
 
Or move elsewhere. It's an easy choice to me, apple priced me out of an iphone of a decent size. There are a lot of countries where many of the people can barely afford a used iphone, expensive headphones out of the question. I never see anyone with anything more than earbuds. I truly doubt all of the android phones will drop it especially in places like here, latin america, so I see apple losing out here. It will take a few years though because most that buy iphones typicaly get one several generations back, they sell more older models new here.

People in 3rd world countries do not get to make 1st world adaptations. Headphones more expensive than an iphone is a 1st world choice.
Your right about that for sure, I've traveled all over Central and South Amercia. I also have nieces and nephews in Peru. We here do tend to obsess about things that are trival in comparison, thank you so much for the reality check.
 
Your right about that for sure, I've traveled all over Central and South Amercia. I also have nieces and nephews in Peru. We here do tend to obsess about things that are trival in comparison, thank you so much for the reality check.

No problem, but I did not mean to sound bitter. I'm not, we just all adapt in different ways.:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleXXXa
This is the same guy who kept talking about how he really believed in Apple. What a slimeball.

Why is he a slime ball? He bought low and sold high - BINGO. Believes in Apple - patience to a point is a virtue - patience beyond some point is stupidity. AAPL has been a crap performer for the last 4 years of Cook's 5 year CEO tenure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toltepeceno
And who exactly is responsible for keeping those "old dudes" below him?

Lol. Tim cook of course. I'm sure Cook has control of everything that happens, if not then he definitely needs to go. It starts with him one way or another.

Why is he a slime ball? He bought low and sold high - BINGO. Believes in Apple - patience to a point is a virtue - patience beyond some point is stupidity. AAPL has been a crap performer for the last 4 years of Cook's 5 year CEO tenure.

I don't get the hate. It's what they do, they don't owe apple anything. As far as apple is concerned why would they care who owns the stock. I'm sure the whiners would buy apple stock and wait to sell it after It drops below their buying price.
 
Last edited:
We've had basically no inflation in the U.S. over those last 16 years, so I'm not sure how you think our government is messing with savers and people making moderate earnings. It has almost gotten to the point where it is scary and weird how low inflation has been and for how long.
There has been plenty of inflation. In assets. Real estate and equities are up over 100% in the past seven years since the crisis. The middle class who don't own assets are stuck with savings earning 0%. This is exactly government messing with savers and benefitting the 1%.

This is why we have such a dramatic wealth inequality in this country and why it has actually gotten worse these last seven years.
 
I'm very worried about Apple. It's losing its grasp on everything: smart watches, smart phones, PCs and even the tablets. I think it's going to take a while for Apple to bounce back. They need a big splash with the Apple Watch 2 and perhaps they should consider a buyback.
 
Theoretically this is more tax efficient since dividends are taxes and share buy backs increase the value of shares by reversing dilution.

For heavens sake, that theory does not work - look at the results (lack there of) of the $120,000,000,000 wasted.
[doublepost=1461904274][/doublepost]
Apple is $100 billion in debt thanks to activist investor and con man Carl.

No - Tim Cook is the CEO - not Carl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleXXXa
I'm going to get hate but Tim was the best choice given the death of Steve Jobs. The future of Apple depends on a visionary at the helm. Steve was the visionary and the worlds best salesman. Hard shoes to fill. If Apple is getting in the car business they should buy Tesla. Make Elon Musk CEO and put Tim back in his old position. I had hoped that Jon Ives would have stepped up to plate. He seems not comfortable in the limelight. He also did his best work with a visionary collaboration with Jobs. Apple will get a car sell it separately as its own line, plus battery tech and many other Markets to expand. Tim is a master of inventory and production efficiency. Exactly what Tesla needs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: simonmet
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.