Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Look him up on wiki. No question Montgomery knows his stuff. And if you haven't already, watch the video. It's a great science-based demo that, without question, sets the story straight on the realities of digital audio.
Oh I did watch the video and it is fascinating and a straight forward scientific video. I was just being cheeky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffPerrin
AIFF has no compression at all. It's a straight PCM format, same as WAV (but allows for more metadata).
AIFF is just a container. It does support numerous compression types. Since iTunes at the time was a QuickTime front-end, it presumably supported decoding all of those, but I'm not sure about encoding.
 
If you really think you can hear the difference between a good mp3 and lossless, test yourself:


For 99,9% of the population it is completely pointless... I'd say I have very good hearing (and almost perfect pitch), I managed to guess 4/6 correct (with good headphones) and even then I wasn't sure for the most parts.
And was that because

1) the high res files are not available anymore? (Am I wrong? I believe there should be three options but I only find two at each question)
2) the 'quiz' contains recordings from times 'high res' digital recordings did not even exist? (Harvest for example)
3) due to constant exposure of MP3 and AAC compression, your ears perceive the trash sound as normal and the high res sounds as a deviation from what is normal?

Even at a acoustic concert we are fed a sound coming from speakers. Because the audience at the back should also hear it. This means that each instrument is equipped with a single microphone. The sound of that is put somewhere in between the speakers to re-create some sort of stereo image. But the spatial effect of stereo is lost that way.

Once I visited Emory Cook, the guy that made the very first commercial stereo recordings. He recorded trains not from left to right or vice-versa but coming towards you. And you can hear the depth of the recordings. You can visualise the distance. That dimension is completely lost in many modern day recordings. Because they use mono-technic recording methods and put the sound somewhere in between their speakers.

But.... There is hope! There are many technicians realising it and bringing back original stereo microphones into the studio. Thanks to high res demand and to the ability to use the exceptional dynamic range offered by high res recording.

And whenever you listen to a 'test' ask yourself where was the original audio recorded and was it really recorded in High res. Because if people create such a test and they do not believe it can reproduce a better sound, they are not aware that they should search for the right material to showcase it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dude-x
AIFF is just a container. It does support numerous compression types. Since iTunes at the time was a QuickTime front-end, it presumably supported decoding all of those, but I'm not sure about encoding.
AIFF is a container for PCM (big or little endian) audio only. AIFF-C can contain compressed encoded audio, none of which the available encoders are in any widespread use at all
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.