Try to not fall into that “we are so stupid” trap, as a society we are miles and miles ahead compared to only 100years ago. We live the lives that even the most powerful of kings and emperors of old wish they had had. We have the resources and riches that makes us the top 1% of the top 0.01% human history wise... we don’t get there by being dumber and stupid. Yes, it’s not perfect, and we do quite the dumb actions, but I wouldn’t call that a failure by any objective measure.!!!! In general, slide the slider to the left or turn the knob counter clockwise to turn the volume down. As a civilization we are now so stupid we can't tell when we have something turned up too loud?
Onto “people don’t know when too loud it’s loud?!”, yes, not shocking either, we are highly adaptable and embrace things as they come... for you “too deathly spicy” might not be spicy at all in Mexico, Thailand or India. North America (and any developed world really) doesn’t know when a 100 calorie intake extra is too much, there’s obesity everywhere, even when every single product and advertisement of today has plastered all nutritions facts. Does that make them stupid? I don’t think so, as alluded in the first points, we have never ever in hundreds thousands of years had this crazy amount of food abundance and ours bodies didn’t evolve for that, it was “eat whatever you find, stash as much as possible and hope for the best next day”, Costco monthly levels of storage is a very very recent phenomenon human kind wise.
[automerge]1594801147[/automerge]
Having bought some AirPods Pro a few days ago and being fascinated by a few of its features, I think there’s still the chance for some “more accurate” statements leeway besides the fact that they control the hardware and know all the specs for theirs. Namely the inner side microphones that detect what’s being pumped into your inner ears.It is not related to BT, and that statement is very presumptive, if not somewhat misleading.
Every set of headphones has its own sensitivity ratings -- basically, how much sound pressure they produce when a standard voltage level is applied.
Apple knows (but doesn't publicize) the figure for its headphones, so it can reasonably say that at X voltage, the result will by Y decibels, and it can be taken to be true.
However, it cannot ensure that it will apply to all headphones; some will be more efficient than Apple's, and be louder given the same input voltage, and some less efficient, and softer at that voltage.
It can assume that most headphones that people use fall within a certain range of sensitivity, and that that scale is close enough, but that undermines the premise of presenting a specific numeric figure, and its accuracy.
This is similar to the Battery Health figure, but in some ways worse. Apple derives that figure from its own undisclosed criteria, but at least doesn't try to apply that to batteries in general. Sound pressure levels are easily, and objectively measurable, and despite the sometimes loosey-goosey games played with specs in CE marketing, mostly adheres to certain known standards.
It will not be wise to put much faith into the presented measurement if Apple permits the feature to be used with non-Apple headphones, and the "more accurate" statement can be construed as disingenuous.
Last edited: