Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm surprised how everyone thinks this is a good thing.

I have older relatives with Android phones and Chrome supports this. They are fooled to enable notifications to predatory websites that spam their phones with notifications with ads.

This is not a good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ian87w
I'm surprised how everyone thinks this is a good thing.

I have older relatives with Android phones and Chrome supports this. They are fooled to enable notifications to predatory websites that spam their phones with notifications with ads.

This is not a good thing.
At least with Apple, I know it’ll be easy for me to turn these notifications off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
This is something that PWAs on iOS have needed for a while. Apple always touts PWAs as an alternative to the App Store but then they have intentionally limited the features for them.
They are doing new work now to implement a feature that wasn’t there before. Not having gotten around to something yet doesn’t imply an overt intent to not do it. Or maybe you have a different definition of the word “intentionally”?
 
Oh please, PLEASE, we NEED more notification features, MacOS and iOS are not enough of a notification clustercluck, we need every crappy website on the planet to be able to notify us too ?.
Safari on macOS has had the ability to do notifications for a long time now. That doesn’t mean you have to say, “yes” when they ask if you want notifications enabled (and they aren’t able to send them unless you enable them). Presumably iOS will be the same way. So you shouldn’t get any more notifications than you do now (and if you’re getting too many now, why haven't you turned some of them off?).

The only concern I see is accounts for children or the technologically inept - folks who just click “yes” on everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iGeneo and SFjohn
They are doing new work now to implement a feature that wasn’t there before. Not having gotten around to something yet doesn’t imply an overt intent to not do it. Or maybe you have a different definition of the word “intentionally”?
Ok maybe “dragging their feet” would be the more correct term. Happy now? Whether they were doing it intentionally or not is up for debate, but Apple half-assed PWA support in iOS, while at the same time saying it was a reasonable alternative to putting an app on the App Store.
 
I swear the EU whatever privacy law is the goddamn worse. Every stupid website I have to deal with popups and like 30-60 seconds of configuring settings. Worse is that it will ask me multiple times because many websites have a bunch of subsites with its own BS privacy and cookies crap.
Yeah - I really hate that websites are forced to tell you that they collect all your data, and it’s even worse that we can actually have options to switch that data gathering off. Damn EU.
 
Apple's lack of support for PWAs in Webkit likely can only be addressed by Government's forcing Apple to allow/support other browsers. This is M$FT using Windows+IE all over again (modern version). Pretty sure the right changes are underway now though as US Senators have been "acknowledging the points Tim makes" when he spend 40+ minutes on the phone with each, then they vote to support opening up the App Store despite Tim's pointers.
Mmmm... I get your point, but cannot 100% agree.

Each software editor like Apple (Safari), MS (Edge), Google (Chrome) and Mozilla (Firefox) implement features and APIs into their browser in order to support new functionalities. For example, supporting a new version of JavaScript, etc. But it's the W3C (web consortium) which is in charge to approve those changes (i.e. what a webpage can or cannot do so). It's a recommendation only, but that makes the web usable on any browser and OS.

Now, on the iPhone things are different because Apple forces everyone to use Web Kit (Safari basically) as they only allow browser based on that kit in the Apple Store. So they have a monopoly and can decide unilaterally w/o being compliant with W3C what they want to see implemented or not.

As for the present situation regarding the Notification API, I'm glad to see it only if that's a W3C approved feature and if Apple follows the W3C implementation. Otherwise, we literally end up with a web (app) that is specific to Apple and that's not how the web is supposed to work. It would be mimicking the behaviour of native app on the web. Mehhhh!!!
 
They’re websites. Calling them apps is insulting to apps.
LOL. Understand you're joking, but nah they are apps. Real apps. Some apps you use are actually web app repackaged into native apps so that they can be delivered on the store. Why would you do that? Well, because apps are more visible to customers on the store. No ones going to DL an app if you give them an URL. People are accustomed to DL from the store. And there we're back to the initial issue: the store being so central.
 
At a previous job I designed, did front-end development and project managed an entire app primarily because web-based push notifications weren't a thing yet on iPhone. Glad to finally see this. There was no reason for it to be locked up in an app, although it probably was a bit more performant given that even though we were providing web views, all the web fonts and CSS were local and we were basically just querying a WordPress API that I built (before WP had an official API). However, having to put it into an app made it a lot more expensive as we had to contract with an outside development team. Although I ended up learning enough about app development to do smaller bug fix updates myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Good to see Apple being proactive. Implementing these features in Safari will protect them from lawsuits such as the one by dating apps in Holland and so on. "If you don't like the App Store, develop a web app."

They can also implement iMessage as a web app too - no one could say "I can't use iMessages from an android phone". You will be able, it's just going to be awkward, slow and ugly. It's a perfect situation for Apple - they DO provide a solution, the fact that it's not ergonomical nor beautiful is usually unimportant to courts.
 
They can also implement iMessage as a web app too - no one could say "I can't use iMessages from an android phone". You will be able, it's just going to be awkward, slow and ugly. It's a perfect situation for Apple - they DO provide a solution, the fact that it's not ergonomical nor beautiful is usually unimportant to courts.
1) Apple is almost certainly not going to be forced to port iMessage to Android as part of any antitrust settlement.
2) If they are, a half-assed, deliberately crippled version is not going to fly with the courts. They’re not morons, you know.
 
Safari on macOS has had the ability to do notifications for a long time now. That doesn’t mean you have to say, “yes” when they ask if you want notifications enabled (and they aren’t able to send them unless you enable them). Presumably iOS will be the same way. So you shouldn’t get any more notifications than you do now (and if you’re getting too many now, why haven't you turned some of them off?).

The only concern I see is accounts for children or the technologically inept - folks who just click “yes” on everything.
Yeah, you hit it on the nose - I can (mostly) turn them off. The only concern I see, like you, is for children (25%? of the population) or the technologically inept (99+% of the population).

The way notifications for every possible thing are going, in 20 years it won't be possible to get someone's attention without wearing your flashing LED bonnet, yelling in a Mickey Mouse voice through a megaphone, and injecting dopamine directly into their brain stem the moment they look at you. Thanks for helping to empower these indispensable sources of incredibly time-sensitive information, Apple. Society is doing great
 
  • Like
Reactions: txscott
I'm surprised how everyone thinks this is a good thing.

I have older relatives with Android phones and Chrome supports this. They are fooled to enable notifications to predatory websites that spam their phones with notifications with ads.

This is not a good thing.
Yup. My non tech literate family members are victims of this as well. I literally disabled notifications for Chrome on all of their devices.
 
Another annoyance to be turned off that will probably be turned back on at every update.
 
1) Apple is almost certainly not going to be forced to port iMessage to Android as part of any antitrust settlement.
2) If they are, a half-assed, deliberately crippled version is not going to fly with the courts. They’re not morons, you know.
They are already saying that other companies are free to use Safari for their apps if they don't like the AppStore policies. If they implement web version of iMessage that has full functionality, I don't think anyone can argue "but but but we want a NATIVE iMessage app for every other OS on the market cuz native apps are way nicer you know"
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.