Meh, it doesn't outperform the M4 by much. And the M4 isn't compatible with the connected architecture that creates the Ultra. I'll pass.
It’s possible they were using chipsets from the current mbp models to test for a future 18” machine (the equiv of the old 17” models) with beefier coolingTested...impossible to be a thing in the current 16" chassis but also in the 14"?? i think this is fake or was just tested to see how toasted the 14" goes
On single core it’s slightly worse, on multicore workloads (and on gpu) it absolutely outperforms, which is typical for high core count workstation and server chips across the industryMeh, it doesn't outperform the M4 by much. And the M4 isn't compatible with the connected architecture that creates the Ultra. I'll pass.
Well said. Much like those that cried about the discontinuation of the 17" MacBook. They made a big stink but in truth, sales of the 17" model were less than 1% of Apple laptops sold. No reason to keep around a product that sells so few units.Apple could build a MacBook that uses 240 Watts and has crazy specs and a 16 inch screen. It would power down 3/4 of the CPU and GPU cores when on battery and run the full system only when plugged into power. Lots of people say they want this, but VERY FEW would actually pay for it.
It is always this way. I heard from an HP marketing person that the #1 most requested feature in an ink jet printer was a paper tray that holds a full package of paper. But in their test marketing, HP found that while people say they want this, few actually buy it when the feature is available because it adds cost, weight, and bulk.
So people on forums say they want stuff, but will they buy it? For the most part, the old M1 with 8GB RAM was overkill for what most people do.
As you stated, the cost is typically the thing. My post just above yours was my wish for an 18" MBP, but my reality is no more than $3499 for the base spec. If Apple priced it at $3999 or above, I'd be out. That's when the aspirational dream purchase slams head-on into financial reality.Apple could build a MacBook that uses 240 Watts and has crazy specs and a 16 inch screen. It would power down 3/4 of the CPU and GPU cores when on battery and run the full system only when plugged into power. Lots of people say they want this, but VERY FEW would actually pay for it.
It is always this way. I heard from an HP marketing person that the #1 most requested feature in an ink jet printer was a paper tray that holds a full package of paper. But in their test marketing, HP found that while people say they want this, few actually buy it when the feature is available because it adds cost, weight, and bulk.
So people on forums say they want stuff, but will they buy it? For the most part, the old M1 with 8GB RAM was overkill for what most people do.
But 512GB of unified memory does a lot for people working in Gen AI.Meh, it doesn't outperform the M4 by much. And the M4 isn't compatible with the connected architecture that creates the Ultra. I'll pass.
Oddly an M3 Ultra would still use WAY less power than even the best engineered G5.The New PowerBook G5!
Literally they wouldn't have any competition in this space. But, the price.......But 512GB of unified memory does a lot for people working in Gen AI.
Yeah, but companies (many venture backed) will buy it for their key engineers.Literally they wouldn't have any competition in this space. But, the price.......![]()
In a post today on the Chinese social media platform BiliBili, a user who we are not familiar with said that they found code references to unreleased 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with the M3 Ultra chip, in an internal build of iOS 18 running on an iPhone 16 engineering prototype. Specifically, they said that they found J514d and J516d codenames in a file located in the /AppleInternal/Diags/Tests/ folder.
J514 and J516 are the codenames for the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with M3 Pro and M3 Max chips, which were introduced by Apple in October 2023. However, these particular codenames have a "d" suffix, which likely refers to an Ultra chip. For example, the Mac Studio with the M3 Ultra is codenamed J575d.
But the ‘d’ could also mean literally anything else. Is there any other evidence of Apple using letters to denote specific SOCs in their code names? J514 and J516 seem specific to the Max chip which means the Laptops with the Pro chips had something different… it’s pretty big assumption to see something used on only one other product and assert it must mean the same thing on another.However, these particular codenames have a "d" suffix, which likely refers to an Ultra chip. For example, the Mac Studio with the M3 Ultra is codenamed J575d.
The New PowerBook G5!
I KNEW this image would show up the moment I read the title 😂View attachment 2513243
People might finally stop complaining about Apple's 'obsession with thinness'.
I KNEW this image would show up the moment I read the title 😂
My word it’s been a long long time since I’ve seen that picture!View attachment 2513243
People might finally stop complaining about Apple's 'obsession with thinness'.
technically no, because it doesn't natively run on macOSBut can it play Crysis?
I'm still happy they didn't make it.Yeah, but companies (many venture backed) will buy it for their key engineers.
No one who has seen the size and weight of the Ultra's heatsink in the Studio believes this. Might as well call it the ThrottleBook Pro.
Apple's highest-end M3 Ultra chip is currently limited to the Mac Studio, but a new leak has revealed that Apple tested the chip in the MacBook Pro as well.
![]()
In a post today on the Chinese social media platform BiliBili, a user who we are not familiar with said that they found code references to unreleased 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with the M3 Ultra chip, in an internal build of iOS 18 running on an iPhone 16 engineering prototype. Specifically, they said that they found J514d and J516d codenames in a file located in the /AppleInternal/Diags/Tests/ folder.
J514 and J516 are the codenames for the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with M3 Pro and M3 Max chips, which were introduced by Apple in October 2023. However, these particular codenames have a "d" suffix, which likely refers to an Ultra chip. For example, the Mac Studio with the M3 Ultra is codenamed J575d.
Apple has never released a MacBook Pro with an Ultra chip, so this is a noteworthy discovery.
Currently, the M3 Ultra is the fastest Mac chip that Apple has ever released. It features up to a 32-core CPU, up to an 80-core GPU, and support for up to 512GB of unified memory, so those could have been MacBook Pro specs in an alternate universe.
Instead, Apple updated the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with M4, M4 Pro, and M4 Max chip options in October last year. Apple most likely decided not to make the M3 Ultra chip available in the MacBook Pro, potentially due to greater thermal and battery life impacts for laptops compared to desktop computers.
With the M4 Max, the MacBook Pro can be configured with up to a 16-core CPU, up to a 40-core GPU, and up to 128GB of unified memory.
All in all, it appears that Apple at least considered MacBook Pro models with the M3 Ultra chip, but it is unlikely that they will ever be released.
Article Link: iOS 18 Leak Reveals Apple Tested MacBook Pros With M3 Ultra Chip