Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As much as I hate Siri, it's should be up to Apple to let people replace Siri, not pressured by laws.
It should be up to the owner of the phone to replace Siri. It's a shame that Apple will only listen to consumers when compelled to by law, but unfortunately we have to speak to Apple in the only language it understands.
 
Last edited:
Siri is SUPER usable as an assistant. For a limited number of tasks. Sometimes those tasks are all that's needed, therefore Siri meets the bill.

Have you tried assistants on other devices and had greater success, or just had a poor experience with Siri?

A year from now, we'll be living in a whole new world where Siri is the gold standard. Patience will be rewarded.
I’ve been on android for the last 2/3 years and just switched back to iPhone. The quality of the answers I get and if I ask Gemini to do something 9/10 it gets done. With Siri “switch on front door light” “you need to install the app for that” which means I then have to go to the apple home app and manually toggle the switch. Siri does manage to set timers I guess
 
  • Love
Reactions: rjp1
You are already able to launch a third part smart assistant app via the action button(by mapping it to Shortcuts). The issue is that you are simply launching the app, and it won't be as deeply integrated with your device as Siri, so you can't use it to create calendar events or play music, for instance).

I suspect this will be something similar. Apple is not going to let iOS house multiple versions of smart assistants; it's probably just letting you map the power button to the respective app, the same way you can link the camera control button to third party camera apps like Halide.
Yes, I’m quite aware of being able to launch an app.

You may notice I was referring to a deep link. Apps can use these (if implemented) to launch to a specific screen or functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjp1
In case some of you missed it, late last month it was widely reported that Apple have finally realised how awful Siri is, and they have agreed to pay Google over $1billion a year to use Gemini as the underlying structure and it should be available in the spring 2026
At the moment Siri uses 150Bn parameters as its language model. Gemini has 1.2Tn.
Apple say they are going to continue developing their AI but so is everyone. If Google are already using a training base that's 1000 times bigger it's going to be extremely difficult for them to catch up

The worst thing about Siri is car play. You can turn it off or live without it elsewhere because you've no alternative in your car if you want to play some music.
So you ask it to play 'Comfortably numb' and it plays 'Christmas hits'.
 
With Siri not being up to the mark, don't mind using a third party assistant. Think such functionality will never be available globally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
This only benefits you if you want a voice assistant to just do general information searches right? Otherwise I doubt any of these can do any of the more core features that Siri would do in relation to reading messages, setting reminds or alarms, connecting to smart home services, etc.
 
I wouldn't trust other AI assistants, but I feel they would be way better than Siri.

Siri has been pretty dumb for the longest time, even before AI. Apple had years to fix her but chose not to for some reason. Not only that, but Siri I swear has become dumber over time, and inconsistently fails given the same requests as if she's developed dementia. Maybe she doesn't hear all the words all the time?

I remember the first iteration of voice commands around the iPhone3 era. It was integrated with iTunes (Apple Music). She worked really well back then, but was very limited in scope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.