Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
70,361
41,966


iOS 26.3 adds a new "Notification Forwarding" setting that allows incoming notifications on an iPhone to be forwarded to a third-party device.

ios-26-3-notification-forwarding.jpg

The setting is located in the Notification section of the Settings app under a new "Notification Forwarding" option. Apple says that notifications can only be forwarded to a single device at a time, so if Notification Forwarding is enabled with a third-party wearable, the Apple Watch won't able to receive and display notifications.

Users can choose to have a device receive notifications only from selected apps rather than all apps, and notifications will include the name of the app and all content contained in the notification. This is a feature that is only available to those living in Europe.

Apple is adding this feature to relieve regulatory pressure that it is facing. The Digital Markets Act in the European Union requires Apple to provide third-party smartwatches and other devices with access to notifications and features that are normally reserved for the Apple Watch.

Update: This article was updated to clarify that Notification Forwarding is only an option in the EU, even though it shows up on iPhones worldwide in iOS 26.3.


Article Link: iOS 26.3 Adds Notification Forwarding Option for Third-Party Wearables
 
Last edited:
Sounds good!
The more of this sort of stuff, the better.

I'd also not that we have EU and US opposition to where Apple is at here.
(bold emphasis below is mine)

The Digital Markets Act in the European Union requires Apple to provide third-party smartwatches and other devices with access to notifications and features that are normally reserved for the Apple Watch.

Apple's limited support of third-party devices has also been targeted by the U.S. Department of Justice in the antitrust case that Apple is fighting. The DoJ has accused Apple of preventing third-party smartwatches from offering Apple Watch-like functionality by restricting them from acting on incoming notifications.
 
Apple is adding this feature to relieve worldwide regulatory pressure that it is facing.

Juli – is there a statement or quote from Apple staff confirming this, or is it speculation?
 
Wild that when Apple introduced Watch people said notifications weren't a big deal, and now they argue that they're such a big deal they deserve anti-competitive scrutiny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
So does it do anything yet or does it need Google, Samsung, etc. to do something on their end? If it is as simple as just bluetooth pair a WearOS watch to an iPhone and you are done, that's great.
 
My Garmin already receives notifications from my iPhone, including the content of the notification - I can't see what this feature actually adds apart from making app-specific notification choices?
 
My Garmin already receives notifications from my iPhone, including the content of the notification - I can't see what this feature actually adds apart from making app-specific notification choices?
Apple has supported ANCS for more than a decade(not sure how much more... but a LONG while). ANCS doesn't require any app on the phone and will just forward notifications after getting approval when pairing with the Bluetooth device.

Apple is being required by the EU to open up ALL information about notifications, this is part of that. ANCS doesn't send images and longer text to bluetooth devices. It seems the EU also wants apps to be able to directly read notifications from other apps... which is ****ing dumb and really really creepy.
 
Apple has supported ANCS for more than a decade(not sure how much more... but a LONG while). ANCS doesn't require any app on the phone and will just forward notifications after getting approval when pairing with the Bluetooth device.

Apple is being required by the EU to open up ALL information about notifications, this is part of that. ANCS doesn't send images and longer text to bluetooth devices. It seems the EU also wants apps to be able to directly read notifications from other apps... which is ****ing dumb and really really creepy.
Come on now... the EU doesn't require any such thing. They require Apple to provide APIs to allow their competition to, well, compete. Apple is completely free in implementing safe ways to do that, and no, not every apps must have direct access to notifications from other apps, that's just bs.

And I'll just assume you are already well aware that you are greatly misrepresenting what ANCS can do.
 
Come on now... the EU doesn't require any such thing. They require Apple to provide APIs to allow their competition to, well, compete. Apple is completely free in implementing safe ways to do that, and no, not every apps must have direct access to notifications from other apps, that's just bs.

And I'll just assume you are already well aware that you are greatly misrepresenting what ANCS can do.

What does ANCS do that the EU is wanting Apple to add besides images?

What I'd like added to ANCS is a better way to respond to notifications than just an "OK" or "Cancel" like ANCS already does, but the EU/DMA actually isn't requiring that you can respond to notifications...just make them look prettier...
 
Notification forwarding barely works on Apple Watch itself. Without a companion app, which fewer developers are making, your options are basically "dismiss."

Same with third party voip apps, calls can't be handled or even notified unless they come from Phone.

Maybe this will encourage Apple to make notifications better on their own device?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.