Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,745
41,121


In July, Apple sued well-known YouTuber Jon Prosser and his acquaintance Michael Ramacciotti over alleged theft of the company's trade secrets, after Prosser leaked some iOS 26 details in videos uploaded to his YouTube channel Front Page Tech. If you are not caught up on the lawsuit, read our initial coverage to learn more.

iOS-26-Feature.jpg

Earlier this week, Prosser told The Verge he has "been in active communications with Apple since the beginning stages of this case," despite Apple's attorneys indicating he missed his deadline to formally respond to the complaint. The court entered a default judgment against Prosser last week, citing his failure to respond.

"The notion that I'm ignoring the case is incorrect," said Prosser. "That's all I am able to say."

In a court document filed on Thursday, Apple's attorneys said they are aware that Prosser has "publicly acknowledged" the complaint. However, they said he "has not indicated whether he will file a response to it or, if so, by when."

As for Ramacciotti, Apple said he has agreed to respond to the complaint by October 29.

In a statement filed with the court, Ramacciotti's attorneys said he is "not a professional leaker," but rather "a lifelong Apple fanboy who failed to fully appreciate the value and proprietary nature of the information that he learned about iOS 26."

Ramacciotti had "no intent to monetize this information" when he contacted Prosser, they said.

Apple is concerned that Ramacciotti "intentionally deleted relevant evidence," including "several hundreds of thousands of text messages," after the company advised him of the need to preserve evidence on July 23. His attorneys disputed this assertion.

Apple and Ramacciotti have informally discussed a potential settlement, and these talks were "ongoing," according to the court filing on Thursday.

Article Link: iOS 26 Leaker Being Sued by Apple is Actually a 'Lifelong Apple Fanboy'
 
And what kind or level of compensation is Apple expecting from individuals obviously lacking the obscene wealth of resources at Apple’s beck and call and disposal? Can Apple be actually so cold and cruel as to send these individuals into fiscal ruin over something (leaks) that happens ahead of each and every hard/software release of theirs? Besides, it is not as if iOS 26 is widely beloved. Apple may have another albatross to handle (26) on top of the iPhone Air.
 
Having the info for himself was enough, he published it for profit.

No true fanboy would want to break the mysticism of a surprise, unless they themselves wanted the fame.

Leaking is a way to sink a ship, and many want to sink Apple.
 
'Fanboy' who makes a living on Apple info executed a careful plan to steal trade secrets from roommate who worked at Apple, published the stolen trade secrets for profit, got his roommate fired, and ignored the court deadline to file response to lawsuit, then says, "I've been responding to Apple!" as if that has ANYTHING at all to do with official court proceedings.

This dirtbag is cooked.
 
And what kind or level of compensation is Apple expecting from individuals obviously lacking the obscene wealth of resources at Apple’s beck and call and disposal? Can Apple be actually so cold and cruel as to send these individuals into fiscal ruin over something (leaks) that happens ahead of each and every hard/software release of theirs? Besides, it is not as if iOS 26 is widely beloved. Apple may have another albatross to handle (26) on top of the iPhone Air.

The harshest punishment would be forcing them to use Android for the rest of their lives.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.