But the Cupertino Kids in California are android. Steve Jobs has to hate that...
I can't help but laugh whenever I read someone saying "Heh, this graph is wrong. I never see anyone with an iPhone/Android/BB."
Dude, you're one person. You probably see .0001% of the population of the state in a week. Let alone how many of those .0001% you actually see with their cell phones out.
I live in Colorado and the funny thing is that I see Android phones predominantly.
Lol, blackberry dominated states are sad, boring places I bet.
Until this year you had to be ATT to use an iPhone, and ATT sucks in some locations (AZ for instance). Android is good on Verizon (good in AZ). I bet iPhone is big where ATT is big, and Android is big where Verizon's big. Blackberry is business, not for touchscreen people like android.
brayhite said:I can't help but laugh whenever I read someone saying "Heh, this graph is wrong. I never see anyone with an iPhone/Android/BB."
Dude, you're one person. You probably see .0001% of the population of the state in a week. Let alone how many of those .0001% you actually see with their cell phones out.
And to comment on the graph, I would love to see a 3G/Cellular strength map from the big 3 (Sprint/AT&T/VZ) over this, to see if phone choice is possibly correlated to carrier service, as some have suggested.
DrNeroCF said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
brayhite said:I can't help but laugh whenever I read someone saying "Heh, this graph is wrong. I never see anyone with an iPhone/Android/BB."
Dude, you're one person. You probably see .0001% of the population of the state in a week. Let alone how many of those .0001% you actually see with their cell phones out.
And to comment on the graph, I would love to see a 3G/Cellular strength map from the big 3 (Sprint/AT&T/VZ) over this, to see if phone choice is possibly correlated to carrier service, as some have suggested.
And as long as that .0001 is randomly sampled, like just seeing people in restaurants and such, it should still be representative of the population. Or, at least, their city.
I can definitely vouch for Louisiana, at least New Orleans and around there, pretty rare to see an Android around here.
I don't really understand Oregon being Blackberry dominated.
Until this year you had to be ATT to use an iPhone, and ATT sucks in some locations (AZ for instance). Android is good on Verizon (good in AZ). I bet iPhone is big where ATT is big, and Android is big where Verizon's big. Blackberry is business, not for touchscreen people like android.
Minnesota is a blue state no matter how you cut it.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
And as long as that .0001 is randomly sampled, like just seeing people in restaurants and such, it should still be representative of the population. Or, at least, their city.
I can definitely vouch for Louisiana, at least New Orleans and around there, pretty rare to see an Android around here.
I'm surprised Florida is an Android dominated state. Most people I see have an Iphone, others have Blackberry's, a few have Android phones but these seem to be growing; att also seems to be the largest carrier at least in Miami.
I can't help but laugh whenever I read someone saying "Heh, this graph is wrong. I never see anyone with an iPhone/Android/BB."
I don't really understand Oregon being Blackberry dominated.