Im not sure how it stacks up against iPad 1 but this baby is quick. A lot faster than iPhone 4.
Multitasking is smooth and damn quick couldn't be happier.
Well "multitasking". It'd be interesting to see how it actually did real multitasking.
As for multitasking, considering it's not really multitasking, I see no reason for it to be slow.
Just yesterday with iOS I was streaming a podcast, downloading a file, had audio navigation cues in the background, logging my route to a GPX file and hosting a wifi access point while switching between IM, my browser and a game.
Not bad for a device that "isn't really multitasking"![]()
Was it a jailbreak multitasking? Because apple's version of multitasking is just saving app state and launching it when needed.
Was it a jailbreak multitasking? Because apple's version of multitasking is just saving app state and launching it when needed.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)
Yeah iPad 1 to 2 is like going from 3gs to iPhone 4.
Really? Really?. That old saying.
Human beings cannot multitask. Can't do it. Period. You can divide your attention but you cannot multitask. Not up for debate.
iOS multitasks. It has several apps available at a moments notice. The same as exposé.
btw, that's a common misconception.
Human's cannot multitask as in: you can't efficiently cook a meal, solve mathematic calculations and watch TV at the same time.
a 'task', however, can involve browsing through a PDF in iBooks 'AND' reading up on wikipedia while writing onto a notepad at the same time.
Really? Really?. That old saying.
Human beings cannot multitask. Can't do it. Period. You can divide your attention but you cannot multitask. Not up for debate.
iOS multitasks. It has several apps available at a moments notice. The same as exposé.
only on macrumors would a thread turn to some worthless babble about what "multitasking" is![]()