Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jamesrick80

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Sep 12, 2014
2,659
2,216
By looking at just the resolution and not the ppi, aren't iPad Airs considered quad HD. For those wanting retina hd on iPad Air 2, the air is already retina HD without the gimmicky terminology. I prefer that the screen remains the same with improved battery life. Extra ppi would only reduce battery life. ;)
 

saltd

macrumors 6502a
Aug 1, 2010
760
371
Technically, they are 1536p with a 4:3 aspect ratio.

4k is 2160p along the shortest side or a horizontal resolution of 4000 pixels, so a quad hd iPad would have a LOT more pixels.

I agree with you-the resolution is high enough. Lets get 3GB of ram in there plus a huge battery and leave the display alone.
 

Infinite Jest

macrumors 6502
Nov 2, 2011
282
14
Harrisonburg, Va
Technically, they are 1536p with a 4:3 aspect ratio.



4k is 2160p along the shortest side or a horizontal resolution of 4000 pixels, so a quad hd iPad would have a LOT more pixels.



I agree with you-the resolution is high enough. Lets get 3GB of ram in there plus a huge battery and leave the display alone.


Preach
 

Angriff

macrumors member
Dec 28, 2013
95
0
Technically, they are 1536p with a 4:3 aspect ratio.

4k is 2160p along the shortest side or a horizontal resolution of 4000 pixels, so a quad hd iPad would have a LOT more pixels.

I agree with you-the resolution is high enough. Lets get 3GB of ram in there plus a huge battery and leave the display alone.

QHD is quad 720p, not 4K. What a lot of people call "4K" is actually UHD (2160p), which is quadrupled FHD (Full HD or 1080p). It's the same resolution as 27" iMacs: 2560 x 1440. iPads slightly exceed the vertical resolution, but at 4:3 they're ~500 pixels short in horizontal resolution.
 

Ledgem

macrumors 68020
Jan 18, 2008
2,034
924
Hawaii, USA
What do you think about an ipad with 16x9 aspect ratio?
The 16:9 ratio is what's used in the Google Nexus tablets, isn't it? I think it looks pretty bad. No doubt the people who have devices with it are used to it and probably happy with it, but I prefer the aspect ratio used in the iPads far more.
 

ZZ Bottom

macrumors 6502a
Apr 14, 2010
829
258
By looking at just the resolution and not the ppi, aren't iPad Airs considered quad HD. For those wanting retina hd on iPad Air 2, the air is already retina HD without the gimmicky terminology. I prefer that the screen remains the same with improved battery life. Extra ppi would only reduce battery life. ;)

Agree. Plenty of pixels to work with.
 

Anti-Lucifer

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2012
776
2
What do you think about an ipad with 16x9 aspect ratio?

It would be wise to go 16:9 next iPad air redesign or even iPad pro.

You will enjoy movies much better, hell, even youtube videos suck on the current iPad 4:3 screens.

On a large device such as the iPad air, being 16:9 won't be that bad for web. On smaller screen sizes, 4:3 would be more sensible. 16:9 on smaller devices for web page viewing just sucks.
 

ZZ Bottom

macrumors 6502a
Apr 14, 2010
829
258
It would be wise to go 16:9 next iPad air redesign or even iPad pro.

You will enjoy movies much better, hell, even youtube videos suck on the current iPad 4:3 screens.

On a large device such as the iPad air, being 16:9 won't be that bad for web. On smaller screen sizes, 4:3 would be more sensible. 16:9 on smaller devices for web page viewing just sucks.

...not going to happen. Even Microsoft realized the 16x9 tablet is awkward to most people, which is why they switched to 3:2.
 

Angriff

macrumors member
Dec 28, 2013
95
0
It would be wise to go 16:9 next iPad air redesign or even iPad pro.

You will enjoy movies much better, hell, even youtube videos suck on the current iPad 4:3 screens.

On a large device such as the iPad air, being 16:9 won't be that bad for web. On smaller screen sizes, 4:3 would be more sensible. 16:9 on smaller devices for web page viewing just sucks.

I think iPad Air 2 will remain 4:3, but the iPad Pro will go with 3:2 as it gives you 2 4:3 screens for split screen multitasking.
 

Ulisescm

macrumors regular
Sep 17, 2014
110
37
Mexico
Interesting debate about aspect ratios, 16x9 or 16x10 is the way to go for vídeos and movies, but maybe not for web surfing and other apps.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.