JOHNGAETANO macrumors 6502 Original poster Jan 3, 2002 346 166 Akron, Ohio May 30, 2021 #1 My Remote Desktop for work seems much quicker vs my 2018 12.9. Is this a result of the M1 or 16 GB? Can’t just be my imagination. Reactions: 007p and leperry
My Remote Desktop for work seems much quicker vs my 2018 12.9. Is this a result of the M1 or 16 GB? Can’t just be my imagination.
hovscorpion12 macrumors 68040 Sep 12, 2011 3,068 3,165 USA May 30, 2021 #2 Remote Desktop did receive an update that stated that start-up would be quicker.
AutomaticApple Suspended Nov 28, 2018 7,401 3,378 Massachusetts May 31, 2021 #3 hovscorpion12 said: Remote Desktop did receive an update that stated that start-up would be quicker. Click to expand... Unrelated to RAM?
hovscorpion12 said: Remote Desktop did receive an update that stated that start-up would be quicker. Click to expand... Unrelated to RAM?
hovscorpion12 macrumors 68040 Sep 12, 2011 3,068 3,165 USA May 31, 2021 #4 AutomaticApple said: Unrelated to RAM? Click to expand... Could be? Not too sure. their last update 10.3 (which launched 4 days ago) did make my remote desktop a bit faster at access. My iPad is the 2018 iPad Pro. Could be something behind the scenes.
AutomaticApple said: Unrelated to RAM? Click to expand... Could be? Not too sure. their last update 10.3 (which launched 4 days ago) did make my remote desktop a bit faster at access. My iPad is the 2018 iPad Pro. Could be something behind the scenes.
D Digitalguy macrumors 601 Apr 15, 2019 4,678 4,513 May 31, 2021 #5 AutomaticApple said: Unrelated to RAM? Click to expand... Clearly, RD apps are not RAM intensive...
B Boni3990@ macrumors newbie Jun 14, 2021 16 3 Jun 14, 2021 #6 same remote Desktop did receive an update that stated that start-up would be quicker.