Cellular iPad is the only way for me. I don’t want to depend on WiFi when I am outside. Also, the cellular model has assisted GPS.
Agreed I’ve always done this. As far back as 2012 and never had any issues.My vote is for the non cellular
I have been using iPhone as a hotspot when no wifi availble - works well for me
I think it depends on usage and carrier and price, for example I was ok taking a deal from Verizon for 100 off of their cellular model size I usually go with cellular for my iPad and wifi for my son. The price isn't too steep for monthly use on my plan at $10 as opposed to the $20 line access for an iPhone.You need to look at how and when you will use it to make your choice.I'm wondering if it's worth getting a model with cellular?
Doesn't seem necessary to pay the extra cost to have it.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks.
I'm wondering if it's worth getting a model with cellular?
Doesn't seem necessary to pay the extra cost to have it.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks.
Tethering from my phone is free on my plan and I have 100GB of data every month so there really is no point in getting a cellular iPad.I never buy the cellular version. I have access to wifi nearly everywhere I go. For those rare occasions that I need wifi and don't have it, I use my phone as a hotspot... $5 for the month that I need it. Between the additional cost for the cellular version and the monthly charge, I've saved a ton going this route.
But for those who often find themselves in places without wifi, I can see where it make sense.
Not to argue against your point but I paid $50 more for the cellular iPad than the wifi equivalent and I pay $10 a month for the line access. if you pay $5 most months you're saving $5 most months plus the 50 overall iPad cost. That hardly is a "ton" you're saving. I rather pay that little extra to save draining the battery on my iPhone. But every person may have different needs depending on wifi access. I don't mind paying that extra because where I work the wifi is spotty and often slow.I never buy the cellular version. I have access to wifi nearly everywhere I go. For those rare occasions that I need wifi and don't have it, I use my phone as a hotspot... $5 for the month that I need it. Between the additional cost for the cellular version and the monthly charge, I've saved a ton going this route.
But for those who often find themselves in places without wifi, I can see where it make sense.
I really don't understand why you are arguing against my point when I clearly stated that rarely do I need wifi and not have it. And I took the time to explain that for people who often find themselves without wifi, then the cellular model is worth it. That would be you. 😕Not to argue against your point but I paid $50 more for the cellular iPad than the wifi equivalent and I pay $10 a month for the line access. if you pay $5 most months you're saving $5 most months plus the 50 overall iPad cost. That hardly is a "ton" you're saving. I rather pay that little extra to save draining the battery on my iPhone. But every person may have different needs depending on wifi access. I don't mind paying that extra because where I work the wifi is spotty and often slow.
I really don't understand why you are arguing against my point when I clearly stated that rarely do I need wifi and not have it. And I took the time to explain that for people who often find themselves without wifi, then the cellular model is worth it. That would be you. 😕
The cellular version of the iPad is $150 more than wifi only. Some carriers offer the rare discount, but that is not usually applicable. I'll define "rarely without wifi".... like 5 times a year within a 1 month window.
That's $5 for the year, for the hotspot. Compare that to $10 a month for a data plan: $120... a year. I keep my iPads about 2 years. That's $240+$150 = $390. THAT is a ton of money. edit: I forgot to subtract the 2 months of hotspot, $10 = net savings $380.