Best bang for your buck by a mile, still. Even with the gripes about iPadOS 26.A16.
Best bang for your buck by a mile, still. Even with the gripes about iPadOS 26.A16.
I’m aware. People tend to have opinions on things they’ve invested in.90% of the people on here spent money on it.
On my M4 iPad Pro, Public Beta 2 was very slow and janky, but PB3 is buttery smooth. So I’d give it a try if you have time to spare.I reverted back to iPad OS18. Not only is it shocking how much smoother and faster SplitView and SlideOver are than the new multitasking - it's actually amazing how much smoother the OS feels overall on my M1 iPad Pro. Maybe it's showing it's age - but on iPad OS18 everything is super fast and butter smooth. On the iPad OS26 PB2 everything felt very slow, janky and buggy. Hopefully that at least will be sorted out by the final release. But I'm actually a little hesitant about that. I wonder if a September release window is actually a bit too soon for the state that it's currently in.
I'll stick on iPad OS18 until - hopefully - public outcry forces Apple te restore the older features, once this thing starts rolling out to the general public.
Yep and some of them look for things to get upset about. Glad we agreeI’m aware. People tend to have opinions on things they’ve invested in.
Nope. Voicing opinions at what is clearly a controversial change on a forum dedicated to that discourse ≠ looking for things to get upset aboutYep and some of them look for things to get upset about. Glad we agree
Nah not upset at all. I enjoy reading it. It’s people’s own time and money and theirs to decide how to spend it.Nope. Voicing opinions at what is clearly a controversial change on a forum dedicated to that discourse ≠ looking for things to get upset about
I could say the same to you then, you seem to be looking for people to be upset with.
Yes, yes and yes. That one line can summarize what I expect from any Apple device, not just iPad. And ease of use focused UI is almost non-existent in modern Apple operating systems. I gotta jump thru the hoops to have something working like I want it to.ease-of-use focused UX.
Hey, please. Stop. You wrote what most of us think about that! I hope mods decide not to delete this one because in my opinion everything is on-point. Steve Jobs indeed would have never approved this trash that is now produced by billion lines of code by Apple’s dev team.I’ve asked the mods for the post to be deleted. I don’t know if they will, but I’m done.
Check my replies below if you like. This was a simple vent/rant that’s turned way too ugly for my liking.
Absolutely. And you inspired me to make a post but more global one: about the ease of use in iOS, iPad OS and macOS. How Apple complicates everything year by year.A rant here is not intended to change things on Apple’s end, it to engage in conversation (and relieve a little frustration, lol). That’s literally the point of forums.
No you aren't. I have 2 iPads (11" and 13" iPad Pro). I use my 11" in full screen mode as a media consumption device and my 13" mainly with a MKB and at times hooked up to a 32" monitor. iPadOS 26 is a giant step forward for my uses. I never used Split View so the complaints about it don't apply to my use case.Am I the only one enjoying iPadOS26? I think it's really cool, and a definite step in teh right direction.
words matter. there is a difference between use case, workflow, purpose and reason. If you think otherwise, well…You seem very stuck on your interpretation of the phrase “use case” and want to nitpick as to what that’s supposed to mean.
Use case, workflow, purpose, reason to buy an iPad, whatever you want to call it.
There are plenty of use cases (or however you wish to describe it) for someone to own an iPad Pro over an iPad. Are you trying to argue there isn’t? If you edit video, you may need the higher refresh rate, or the more accurate colors. You might need the Thunderbolt 4 for faster data transfer. You might need the extra storage that you can only get on a Pro. The faster chip to export video. The bigger screen. The LiDAR Scanner. Etc.
It’s no different than a professional video editor opting to buy a Mac Studio over a Mac mini, or a Mac Pro over an iMac. They have different use cases for it and therefore need the more powerful device.
Now circle all the way back to the original argument you replied to. Someone who goes to the Apple Store and sees their whole lineup, from a base iPad, to the Air, to the 2 different Pro Versions. The person who says: I really only need the iPad for $329 I don’t need the $1,099 iPad Pro, or I want the smallest form factor iPad mini. That person is more often than not, not a power user and is never going to hook up a mouse, keyboard, and external monitor, thus a different use case.
This isn’t great. However the flicking does make it slightly less jarring. I’ve heard people talking about that flicking but that never worked for me. Is that supposed to work with touch, trackpad, or both?
This is an excellent point. After my wife got the new iPad Air, I looked into one for myself with the magic keyboard figuring with iPadOS that I could have a "good enough" Macbook-like device. That option was going to cost me essentially the same as a base Macbook Air.but the combination of a decent iPad with a folio enters, or exceeds, MacBook pricing territory.