Interesting, the Geekbench scores for iPhone12,3 suggest otherwise. Hmmm...
I will submit this thread to MacRumors.
The benchmark you mention was an old one, and for iPhone12,1, which should be iPhone 11 anyway. Newer benchmarks for iPhone12,3 have since been posted. This should be iPhone 11 Pro.The geekbench scores also showed non-performance increases from an XS which doesn’t tally up with what Apple said.
No proof that benchmark was legit.
Very normallyThe benchmark you mention was an old one, and for iPhone12,1, which should be iPhone 11 anyway. Newer benchmarks for iPhone12,3 have since been posted. This should be iPhone 11 Pro.
They show significantly higher Geekbench multicore scores, but similar single core scores. However, both sets of scores for the two devices show 4 GB.
How reliable is Steve H.McFly?
I have submitted this thread to MacRumors. Perhaps they can sort this all out.
He’s pretty much leaked most new devices including the iPhone 11 Pro way in advanced, he’s reliable.
Ok. Good to know.Very normally
That screengrab is 6 GB with 64 GB.McFly has just double led down on his 6GB prediction, although he does say "we'll see". Some are suggesting 6GB will be with the 512GB storage.
I don’t understand what you are trying to say here.One theory I find credible is like other devices, Apple increases memory when they add CPUs on the SoC, which could point to more ram this year.
View attachment 857585
Hoping this is true.McFly has just double led down on his 6GB prediction, although he does say "we'll see". Some are suggesting 6GB will be with the 512GB storage. One theory I find credible is like other devices, Apple increases memory when they add CPUs on the SoC, which could point to more ram this year.
View attachment 857585
How reliable is Steve H.McFly?
He’s Marty’s brother, he borrowed the DeLorean.... (/H)