That's exactly what happened many continued to over pay for their phones post the minimum term originally as the hidden fee was based on minimum termNot really; you weren't paying the cost of the phone in your bill. If you were, when the phone was "paid off" and out of contract, your bill would drop by a certain amount.
But it did not. This would pressure people into upgrading, because they "might as well" get a new phone if they're eligible for another subsidy.
Frankly I like the new way better. Treat the phone as a separate thing you buy and pay for as a line item on the bill (or credit card) and have the service be on its own.
This $30 fee is bull, though.
Only latterly and more honest ish carriers started to reduce the fee post the minimum term
But many paid $100's over for their phones by not being wise to couriers charges until plans changed and moved on from this false subsidy title many attached to purchase plans
It took a long time for US carriers to change and still their are many pitfalls and lock-ins and stealth charges or catches on accessories etc and even legacy plans some dare not upgrade from
I think US rates the 3rd most expensive country to own a smartphone but fares much better as a % of average income