They're selling high-powered because the marketing benefits outweigh whatever flak they're gonna get, plus concerned customers still have the choice to slow charge. When fast charging was a new thing, it was known to be harder on the battery. I'll bet Apple has done a lot of work to mitigate that kind of damage, but I doubt it's the same as slow charging. And if the batteries last a year less, maybe that's a good thing for Apple.Yeah, that’s a misconception Apple sold to defend low-watt chargers.
Have you not considered why they’ve finally climbed on board the high powered trend now?
Linus did a great experiment to see if low watt chargers were better for you battery in the long run, and yes, while they give off less heat, they require 4 times as long to charge than a higher watt charger would need, meaning you’re heating your battery for way longer than necessary.
Also, isn’t the point of a mobile device supposed to be that it’s wireless? What good is it being plugged in several hours a day?
I’ve been charging my phone using a 35 watt since it could take in that amount of energy, and I’ve noticed my batter hasn’t aged any worse than my older iPhones that were stuck to the 5 watt chargers for way longer.
1-3W doesn't sound right. The slowest possible way I could charge my iPhone was 2.5W = 500mA * 5V. A brick is going to be at least an amp.I find it more remarkable, that apple recommends the Magsafe Duo to people like me, with an iPhone 8 Plus. But it is useless because apple limits the charging to 1-3W with an 30W Brick. A whole night is not enough time to charge the phone. But no one cares.
personally a faster wireless charging would be nice when:
Apple implements a vapour chamber to keep the device and battery cool from over-heating which leads to poor battery life and capacity longevity. Until then 12w is fine by me.
looking at my 8mths old iPhone 12 mini that I mostly charged over MagSafe and my battery health drop, I’ll be much smarter using Lightning on the 13 mini going forward.
It is pretty slow. Even apple support document state, that Magsafe charges QI Devices slower1-3W doesn't sound right. The slowest possible way I could charge my iPhone was 2.5W = 500mA * 5V. A brick is going to be at least an amp.
Damn... my launch day Mini is down to 90%. I never had an iPhone drop that low so fast.
Also the first iPhone i'm charging wirelessly.. hmm...
Yes but imagine the degradation to the battery with all that heat.While Android phones are charging at 120w
Damn YouTube creators do anything for subsAh, now comes the stream of people complaining about 3W.
It’s actually pretty remarkable how many care about a watt here and there, actually.
If you are in a hurry to charge it then wired charging is what you want. MagSafe is perfect for charging while doing work or sleeping. If you are going out and need your phone charged pretty full and fast, go with fast charging and one of the Mac chargers. I have an Anker USB C car charger and that thing is insanely fast.
personally a faster wireless charging would be nice when:
Apple implements a vapour chamber to keep the device and battery cool from over-heating which leads to poor battery life and capacity longevity. Until then 12w is fine by me.
looking at my 8mths old iPhone 12 mini that I mostly charged over MagSafe and my battery health drop, I’ll be much smarter using Lightning on the 13 mini going forward.
But look at the junk they’re putting it on. But it's quick charging junk, so that’s a positive I guess.While Android phones are charging at 120w
I forgo wireless entirely and charging only with wired now. 6 months on and my battery is still at 100%.In prior years, my battery health has been 98% or such when I make use of the iPhone upgrade program. This year, it’s at 90%. The only difference is I’ve been using fast chargers this year.
I may go back to the good ol’ 5 watt wall wart with my 13 Pro…
I've been using MagSafe 99% of the time with my 12 Pro that I've had since April and my battery health is still at 100%
thats great and just to check that health is checked with charger disconnected right and a reboot just to triple check?
Lucking you. I’ve been using my Belkin 3-in-1 MagSafe.
Mac chargers are much more than 20w. Try 85 or 100w and it’ll be much faster.As I mentioned, I've tried both (MagSafe AND wired through 20W USB C adapter) and didn't see much difference.
Mac chargers are much more than 20w. Try 85 or 100w and it’ll be much faster.
You’re right, it requires a minimum of a 18w adapter but higher wattage adapters don’t go any faster. I can say it is definitely faster than MagSafe, at least for the fast charging part.From what I've read, iPhone can't charger faster than around 22W, so if you think your 85 or 100W charger is charging your phone faster, then it's likely the placebo effect.
Lol read this again after a few days and I’m gonna steal that: donut care!Donut care. It’s little and the 12 charges plenty fast to suit me.
lol no I typed that on purpose! It felt somehow less snide than saying I don’t care because I didn’t want to actually disrespect people who feel differently. At least that’s how it works according to GrumpyMom logic. 😆Lol read this again after a few days and I’m gonna steal that: donut care!
I know it’s a typo but it just works lol.
While Apple's standard MagSafe Charger can typically support up to 15 watts of peak power delivery to iPhone models when used with an appropriate power adapter, last year's iPhone 12 mini was limited to a lower 12-watt peak, perhaps due to thermal constraints with the smaller device.
![]()
As highlighted in an update to Apple's support document on the MagSafe Charger today, that restriction remains in place for this year's iPhone 13 mini, similarly subjecting it to the lower 12-watt limit. Given the nearly identical body size between the iPhone 12 mini and iPhone 13 mini, it's not particularly surprising that the limit applies to both devices, but to our knowledge this is the first time Apple has confirmed it.
An iPhone connected to MagSafe intelligently manages its power draw to prevent overheating, and thus even a fully supported model capable of charging at 15 watts may see much of its charging time spent below that threshold in an effort to protect battery health.
The smaller battery of the mini-sized iPhone models also means that they require less energy to recharge than larger models, so an iPhone 12 mini or iPhone 13 mini capped at a peak of 12 watts may not take any longer to charge to full via MagSafe than an iPhone 13 with a 15-watt limit. Still, users should be aware that this restriction persists with this year's mini iPhone.
This isn't the only MagSafe-related topic making the rounds today, as it's been discovered that the iPhone 13 Pro with Apple's standard case on it doesn't sit quite properly on the MagSafe Duo Charger due to the size and height of the lip that protects the rear cameras. Despite the fit issue, the phone seems to make a proper connection and charge normally.
Article Link: iPhone 13 Mini Still Limited to Maximum 12W of Peak Power via MagSafe Charger