Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 16 Lineup Will Feature A18 and A18 Pro Chips, Analyst Says
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Very well could be. I debated on the base iPad — almost changed it before sending. We don’t get breakdowns of volume by model, but I suspect the volume on the base iPad is much higher than the other models. It might take that model to offer volumes to make a Pro version worthwhile over having the non-Pro iPhones just use last year’s processor model. I suspect they have other features planned for future Pro A-series processors, which might help us understand further why they chose to distinguish the A17 Pro in this way.
Yeah, the titanium seems to be a double-edged sword, lighter, but not as good as the stainless steel when it comes to heat dissipation.
And aluminum is better than stainless steel. Interestingly, some carbon fiber composite are real good thermal conductors along directions of the fiber layer closest to the thermal source.
I wouldn’t have any issue with Apple if they used aluminum with the Pro models instead of titanium. Aluminum feels premium enough for me. Their laptops use it.
Why would the EU do that? Most people within the EU and continental Europe use Android devices, Apple have a large share, but not a majority. Apple have far more to lose pulling out of Europe than the other way around. You think Apple could cope with losing $51B a year from that market alone? Do me a favour.
Some of these posts really get stupid sometimes and really don't need to be made.
THIS JUST IN! THE NEXT IPHONE WILL HAVE IOS INSTALLED!
THIS JUST IN! THE NEXT IPHONE WILL HAVE IOS INSTALLED!
You must have missed where I said Apple, Google, and Microsoft should go together on it. No Windows. My macOS, No Android. No iOS. Yes, they would 100% come crawling back asking them to come back.
So effectively harm business across an entire continent which will have a huge effect on the rest of the World that bank and buy products and services from here? Why on earth would you think that is in anyway logical and to what benefit?
So because you are pro monopoly, you want to harm dozens of economies, including America’s? I don’t think you have a single clue or grasp on what you are proposing at all. Laughable.
On the contrary, water is inherently wet. The mistake you're making is conflating "object" with "solid". Obviously when you say "object" you mean a physical object (as opposed to, say, the object of a sentence). And something doesn't have to be a solid to be a physical object.
A raindrop, for instance, has mass, and is thus a physical object, even though it's a liquid. Likewise all the water molecules in a raindrop are themselves objects. And every bit of water in that raindrop—and, indeed, in any object that is made of water—is fully in contact with water, and thus, by definition, wet.
The reason we would refer to "wet ice" but not "wet water" (where by "water" we mean the liquid state) isn't because the latter isn't possible; it's because all liquid water is wet, and thus "wet water" is silly. It's like saying "blue blue paint".
Last edited:
