Rumor has it that the 17 Pro Max has a Super Utra Wide Camera+:
There are even some leaked selfie shots:
There are even some leaked selfie shots:
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 16 Pro's Ultra Wide Camera Rumored to Receive Major Upgrade
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
no amount of 48 MP sensors can change the fact that their CCD and lenses are tiny comparing to a proper DLSR. Need great lighting to take good photos. Anything dimmer? It just got much worse.
The one time I saw a blurry mess of a photo taken by iPhone 12 Pro Max, I knew what iPhone camera was truly capable of. Another 48 MP sensor won't dramatically improve mid-to-low-light performance anyhow.
The one time I saw a blurry mess of a photo taken by iPhone 12 Pro Max, I knew what iPhone camera was truly capable of. Another 48 MP sensor won't dramatically improve mid-to-low-light performance anyhow.
Yep, this is the real reason for this upgrade: better spatial videos for the Vision Pro. I'm surprised the article didn't mention this. It's so obvious.
The ultra wide lens gets cropped in to match the view of the main lens, so it is working with a lot less resolution, being cropped down from 12MP currently. That's why spatial videos can't be shot in 4K now. This will unlock that capability.
so 1 of 4 cameras updated for the Pro models every year ... kinda lame
true for still photography cameras, with interchangeable lenses. But smartphones redefine that space as the lenses cannot reach the quality of dedicated cameras, so they are going another way to appeal all those who don't want dedicated cameras (for whatever reason) ... keep in mind, the best camera is the one that you have with you ...
Increasing the size of the sensor improves low light performance. Dividing a sensor into more pixels increases the noise in each pixel, resulting worse low light performance. Pixel binning improves low light performance by reducing the number of effective pixels, but not as much as actually reducing the number of of pixels by making each pixel larger.
A sensor with one huge pixel would have the best low light performance, but resolution would be horrible.
A sensor with one huge pixel would have the best low light performance, but resolution would be horrible.
Company uses marketing and want to earn money. Furthermore you are forced to buy a new one every single year.
How dare they?
This is one area where my Pixel 8 Pro beats the iPhone 15 Pro. It has a larger sensor for the ultra-wide. In lower light photos, the corners of the ultra-wide Pixel image are much clearer than on the iPhone, which smears away much of the fine details (the corners of ultra-wide lenses/sensors receive quite a bit less light than the center. The corners are significantly boosted in brightness in software). But even with the worse ultra-wide hardware, the iPhone does better at video captured with its ultra-wide.
The Pixel has 48 or 50 mp sensors for all three lenses, but while it can capture significantly more detail in 50 mp mode on the 1x/wide camera than the 12 mp mode, I find that the higher 48 mp mode on the ultra-wide and telephoto lenses isn't really much of an improvement over the 12 MP mode. I'm not sure that a 4k mode for the iPhone 16 Pro Spatial Video mode would capture significantly more detail.
For those of you calling for the same sensor to be used for all three lenses, I doubt it's as easily done as said. It's very possible that they can't physically fit a lens that can provide an image that would cover the size of a larger sensor.
The Pixel has 48 or 50 mp sensors for all three lenses, but while it can capture significantly more detail in 50 mp mode on the 1x/wide camera than the 12 mp mode, I find that the higher 48 mp mode on the ultra-wide and telephoto lenses isn't really much of an improvement over the 12 MP mode. I'm not sure that a 4k mode for the iPhone 16 Pro Spatial Video mode would capture significantly more detail.
For those of you calling for the same sensor to be used for all three lenses, I doubt it's as easily done as said. It's very possible that they can't physically fit a lens that can provide an image that would cover the size of a larger sensor.
Last edited:
It’s possible the image quality there is already limited by the optics. Among the (now nearly extinct) point-and-shoot cameras, periscope lens arrangements were often found to be inferior to telescoping ones.
Come on! Everyone knows Apple does this on purpose.
They purposely gave the 15 USB 2 speeds, they introduced the 24MP shooting option for the 15/15P/15P/15PM and they can't do it in the 14 Pro and Pro Max because... ??
I love the iPhone and Apple products, but no one can deny that since Tim Cook took over, they have been innovating at a really slow pace, plus, they have stupid software limitations that no one understands. Maybe Androids don't have the RAW performance of Apple Bionic and Silicon but at least they use the hardware at its full potential and are delivering more innovation and No I am not talking about Samsung.
Yes all sensors on the back should be 48MP but honestly it makes so much more sense to cram 48MP into the telephoto first because it would significantly help with digital zoom beyond the optical limit. The 5x photos from the 15PM look good but you can tell it's a low res sensor because of all the Apple oil painting processing. I've seen some native 5x 15PM shots that look like digital crops.
The sensor size (or pixel count) is rather unimportant. The quantum efficiency (probability of a photon creating a charge carrier pair) does not vary significantly between sensors. The important thing is the number of photons striking the sensor.
That number depends on the physical aperture of the lens. A bigger lens gives better performance. A bigger lens is, unfortunately, bigger. Larger diameter requires more space and due to practical engineering reasons makes the objective lens longer, i.e., thicker.
So, replacing the sensor with one with more pixels, larger area, or just with a someone better one does not help.
Being smart Alec are you? Apple was about innovation, then marketing, then money… where is innovation now? You call annual upgrade of each sensor (4 in total) innovation?
Absolutely not. But where do we see substantial annual upgrades, in which sector in terms of consumer electronics?
The phones under Steve weren’t such crazy upgrades year for year as well.
Smartphones are nearly „finished“ the way they are.
We can talk about new ideas from Apple, do foldables etc.
Nevertheless don’t see the point of these forced yearly upgrades. Buy a new phone bi-yearly and it’s all fine. When there is something that attracts you so much, you’re free to upgrade earlier.
Last edited:
Not necessarrily. A 48MP image downsampled to 12MP has less noise and more detail than a native 12MP image.
Honestly, if that is the case, then Apple should just release an actual compact digital camera line running iOS. Samsung did it years ago and people weren't really ready for it - we were still on 2G wifi and 3G cellular, and people wanted small phones back then, but there are definitely people that would buy it if the photos were good since we're all much more used to larger phones now.
Attachments
Can't wait!
I'd love using the ultrawide more, but the photos and videos are so much worse than the main camera.
I'd love using the ultrawide more, but the photos and videos are so much worse than the main camera.