Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My MIL is the only person I know/seen that has the 16e. Similarly, I haven’t seen any 17 Air’s out in the wild (but it’s still fairly new).

I feel Apple should have priced the 16e a little more competitively. But what do I know?
 
256G iPhone 16E with apple care + case + screen protector + tax = $1000
that's not budget friendly and all of those "extras" are reasonable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: delsoul
256G iPhone 16E with apple care + case + screen protector + tax = $1000
that's not budget friendly and all of those "extras" are reasonable.

"Budget friendly" would be the base 16e version with 128GB of storage and without all those extras you added…
 
The 16e was never a budget friendly iPhone to begin with. The SE was a budget iPhone and priced accordingly. The 16e is merely an iPhone 13 with a newer chip and a lot of drawbacks like the single camera and lack of Magsafe magnets. Same recipe as the SE but not priced accordingly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I was at the Apple Store yesterday and forgot to look at the 16e! Grrr..

Got the 35 seconds I needed of "hands on" time with the Air to realize it's WAY too big for me.

I have less than zero interest in a device the length and width of an Air.
Thinness was nice I guess. I don't personally care about a device being as thin as the Air is.

There are diminishing returns on that metric for me.
 
As a proud owner of the iPhone 16e I have to disagree with the fact that it failed. It’s a great device and does all that I need in a iPhone with out being overly costly and gimmicky. That’s all that matters.
It's a good device for sure. But I found no magsafe to be a REALLY greedy omission for the price of that phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dave559
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.